Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:59:10.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

My Body, Your Body, Her-His Body: Is/Does Some-Body (Live) There?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Abstract

Taking up the arguments set out by Anna Cutler in the preceding article, Susan Melrose here cautions against what she sees as the dangers Cutler fails to take into account of nominalization as an inherently conservative process. She suggests that the reification of the term ‘the body’ carries its own dangers, unless its complexities – as suggested by the title of this article – are recognized and assimilated. Arguing that many of the problems identified by Cutler are as applicable to the male as to the female performer, Susan Melrose concludes that the primacy of the word in documentation processes, though contested by Anna Cutler, has none the less caused her to overlook existing, effective forms of performance documentation, perhaps because they originate from and primarily serve the interests of performers rather than academics. Susan Melrose is Senior Lecturer at the Central School of Speech and Drama, where she leads the MA course in Performance Studies. She is author of A Semiotics of the Dramatic Text (Macmillan, 1994), and a contributor to numerous journals and symposia in her field. Further contributions to the debate initiated in these articles are planned and invited.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, J., Bodies That Matter (Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
de Certeau, M., The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Clifford, J. and Marcus, , Writing Culture (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., A Thousand Plateaus (University of Minnesota Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Dolan, J., ‘In Defence of the Discourse’, The Drama Review, No. 123 (Fall 1989).Google Scholar
Etchells, T. and Lowdon, R., ‘Forced Entertainment: Emanuelle Enchanted …’, Contemporary Theatre Review, II, No. 2 (1994).Google Scholar
Foster, S., Corporealities (Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Halliday, M., ‘Language and the Order of Nature’, in MacCabe, et al. , eds., The Linguistics of Writing (Manchester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Irigaray, L., This Sex Which Is Not One (Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Lacan, J., Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (Penguin, 1994).Google Scholar
Melrose, S., A Semiotics of the Dramatic Text (Macmillan, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melrose, S., ‘The Strange Arts of Ambivalence’, in Heathfield, A.., ed., Shattered Anatomies: Traces of the Body in Performance (Arnolfini Live, 1997).Google Scholar
Mulvey, L., ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’, Screen Reader in Sexuality (Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Schneider, R., The Explicit Body in Performance (Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Sellers, S.., ed., The Hélène Cixous Reader (Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar