Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:54:41.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ordering and aging properties of systems with dependent components governed by the Archimedean copula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2021

Tanmay Sahoo
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Karwar, Rajasthan 342037, India. E-mail: nilkamal@iitj.ac.in
Nil Kamal Hazra
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Karwar, Rajasthan 342037, India. E-mail: nilkamal@iitj.ac.in

Abstract

Copula is one of the widely used techniques to describe the dependency structure between components of a system. Among all existing copulas, the family of Archimedean copulas is the popular one due to its wide range of capturing the dependency structures. In this paper, we consider the systems that are formed by dependent and identically distributed components, where the dependency structures are described by Archimedean copulas. We study some stochastic comparisons results for series, parallel, and general $r$-out-of-$n$ systems. Furthermore, we investigate whether a system of used components performs better than a used system with respect to different stochastic orders. Furthermore, some aging properties of these systems have been studied. Finally, some numerical examples are given to illustrate the proposed results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amini-Seresht, E., Zhang, Y., & Balakrishnan, N. (2018). Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems under different random environments. Journal of Applied Probability 55: 459472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, N. & Zhao, P. (2013). Hazard rate comparison of parallel systems with heterogeneous gamma components. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 113: 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, N. & Zhao, P. (2013). Ordering properties of order statistics from heterogeneous populations: A review with an emphasis on some recent developments. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 27: 403443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, N., Barmalzan, G., & Haidari, A. (2014). Stochastic orderings and ageing properties of residual life lengths of live components in $(n-k+ 1)$-out-of-$n$ systems. Journal of Applied Probability 51: 5868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Barmalzan, G., Haidari, A., & Balakrishnan, N. (2018). Univariate and multivariate stochastic orderings of residual lifetimes of live components in sequential $(n - r + 1)$-out-of-$n$ systems. Journal of Applied Probability 55: 834844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barmalzan, G., Ayat, S.M., Balakrishnan, N., & Roozegar, R. (2020). Stochastic comparisons of series and parallel systems with dependent heterogeneous extended exponential components under Archimedean copula. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 380: 112965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belzunce, F., Franco, M., Ruiz, J.M., & Ruiz, M.C. (2001). On partial orderings between coherent systems with different structures. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 15: 273293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P.J., El-Neweihi, E., & Proschan, F. (1994). Applications of the hazard rate ordering in reliability and order statistics. Journal of Applied Probability 31: 180192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bon, J.L. & Păltănea, E. (2006). Comparisons of order statistics in a random sequence to the same statistics with i.i.d. variables. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 10: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, H.A. & Nagaraja, H.N. (2003). Order statistics. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykstra, R., Kochar, S., & Rojo, J. (1997). Stochastic comparisons of parallel systems of heterogeneous exponential components. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 65: 203211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esary, J.D. & Proschan, F. (1963). Reliability between system failure rate and component failure rates. Technometrics 5: 183189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, R., Li, C., & Li, X. (2016). Stochastic comparisons on sample extremes of dependent and heterogeneous observations. Statistics 50: 930955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, M., Ruiz, M.C., & Ruiz, J.M. (2003). A note on closure of the ILR and DLR classes under formation of coherent systems. Statistical Papers 44: 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, N. (2013). Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems. Journal of Applied Probability 50: 848860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, N., Misra, N., & Kumar, S. (2015). Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components. European Journal of Operational Research 240: 425430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K. & Finkelstein, M. (2019). Comparing lifetimes of coherent systems with dependent components operating in random environments. Journal of Applied Probability 56: 937957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K. & Misra, N. (2020). On relative ageing of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components. Advances in Applied Probability 52: 348376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K. & Misra, N. (2021). On relative ageing comparisons of coherent systems with identically distributed components. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 35: 481495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K. & Nanda, A.K. (2016). Stochastic comparisons between used systems and systems made by used components. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 65: 751762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K., Kuiti, M.R., Finkelstein, M., & Nanda, A.K. (2017). On stochastic comparisons of maximum order statistics from the location-scale family of distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 160: 3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, N.K., Kuiti, M.R., Finkelstein, M., & Nanda, A.K. (2018). On stochastic comparisons of minimum order statistics from the location-scale family of distributions. Metrika 81: 105123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelkinnama, M. & Asadi, M. (2019). Stochastic and ageing properties of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components. Statistical Papers 60: 805821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaledi, B.E. & Kochar, S. (2000). Some new results on stochastic comparisons of parallel systems. Journal of Applied Probability 37: 11231128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaledi, B.E. & Kochar, S. (2006). Weibull distribution: some stochastic comparisons results. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136: 31213129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S. & Xu, M. (2007). Stochastic comparisons of parallel systems when components have proportional hazard rates. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 21: 597609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, A., Chowdhury, S., Nanda, A.K., & Hazra, N.K. (2016). Some results on majorization and their applications. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 301: 161177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C.D. & Xie, M. (2006). Stochastic ageing and dependence for reliability. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Li, X. & Fang, R. (2015). Ordering properties of order statistics from random variables of Archimedean copulas with applications. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 133: 304320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & Li, X. (2019). Hazard rate and reversed hazard rate orders on extremes of heterogeneous and dependent random variables. Statistics and Probability Letters 146: 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. & Lu, X. (2003). Stochastic comparison on residual life and inactivity time of series and parallel systems. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 17: 267275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, A.J. & Nĕslehová, J. (2009). Multivariate Archimedeaen copulas, $D$-monotone functions and $\ell _1$-norm symmetric distributions. The Annals of Statistics 37: 30593097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, A.K., Jain, K., & Singh, H. (1998). Preservation of some partial orderings under the formation of coherent systems. Statistics and Probability Letters 39: 123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. (2018). Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems. Metrika 81: 465482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Mulero, J. (2020). Comparisons of coherent systems under the time-transformed exponential model. TEST 29: 255281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Rubio, R. (2010). Comparisons of coherent systems using stochastic precedence. TEST 19: 469486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Águila, Y.D., Sordo, M.A., & Suárez-Liorens, A. (2013). Stochastic ordering properties for systems with dependent identically distributed components. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 29: 264278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Águila, Y.D., Sordo, M.A., & Suárez-Liorens, A. (2014). Preservation of reliability classes under the formation of coherent systems. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 30: 444454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Pellerey, F., & Di Crescenzo, A. (2015). Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components. European Journal of Operational Research 240: 127139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Águila, Y.D., Sordo, M.A., & Suárez-Liorens, A. (2016). Preservation of stochastic orders under the formation of generalized distorted distributions: Applications to coherent systems. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 18: 529545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, R.B. (2006). An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Pledger, G. & Proschan, F. (1971). Comparisons of order statistics and of spacings from heterogeneous distributions. In Optimizing methods in statistics, Rustagi, J. S. (ed.). Ohio: Academic Press, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
Razaei, M., Gholizadeh, B., & Izadkhah, S. (2015). On relative reversed hazard rate order. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 44: 300308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. (2007). System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. & Navarro, J. (2016). On comparing coherent systems with heterogeneous components. Advances in Applied Probability 48: 88111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, D. & Deshpande, J.V. (1994). Some results on the relative ageing of two life distributions. Journal of Applied Probability 31: 9911003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, D. & Nanda, A.K. (1999). Log-concave and concave distributions in reliability. Naval Research Logistics 46: 419433.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, P., Li, X., & Balakrishnan, N. (2009). Likelihood ratio order of the second order statistic from independent heterogeneous exponential random variables. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100: 952962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, P., Li, X., & Da, G. (2011). Right spread order of the second order statistic from heterogeneous exponential random variables. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 40: 30703081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar