Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:47:35.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymmetric Communication in Bilingual Exchanges1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Christine Heredia de
Christine Heredia de
Affiliation:
Université de Paris V
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the characteristics of exolinguistic communication, a type of asymmetric communication. The data base contains five dialogues between French speakers and Latin American Spanish speakers. The subjects did not have any knowledge of French before their arrival in France. The recording situations were as authentic and varied as possible.

In exolinguistic communication two speakers actively work together with varying degrees of cooperation and complementary strategies to achieve mutual understanding. In this study we examine the role of repetition, simplification, and facilitation (breaking up information, paraphrases, types of questions which warn of difficulties, etc.) and analyze the characteristics of asymmetric exchanges made up of three- or four-turn sequences which allow speakers to check understanding and avoid misunderstanding.

This leads to several hypotheses on natural second language acquisition and, more specifically, on the “guidance” offered by the native speaker and on the role of metalinguistic activities.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1986 , pp. 369 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. (ed.). 1983. Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. et al. 1981. La nouvelle communication. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1978. The role of dialogues in language acquisition. In Sinclair, H., Jarbella, R., & Levelt, W. (eds.). The child conception of language, pp. 242–56. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1983. Le développement de l'enfant: Savoir dire, savoir faire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Deulofeu, J. & Taranger, M. C.. 1984. Relation entre la linguistique et le culturel: Microscopie de quelques malentendus et incompréhensions. In Noyau, C. & Porquier, R. (eds.). Communiquer dans la langue de l'autre, pp. 99–129. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (eds.). 1983. Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of language, pp. 141–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
François, F. 1982. Ebauches d'une dialogique. Connexions 38; 63–87.Google Scholar
François, F., Hudelot, C., & Sabeau-Jouannet, E.. 1984. Conduites linguistiques chez le jeune enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires Françaises.Google Scholar
Giacomi, A. 1983. Une analyse de l'interaction en langue seconde: Le jeu des questions & réponses. G.R.A.L. Papiers de Travail 1: 81–94.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. 1978. Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In Hatch, E. (ed.). Second language acquisition: A book of readings, pp. 401–35. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. 1983. Simplified input. In R. Andersen (ed.), pp. 64–86.Google Scholar
Heredia, C. de. & Noyau, C.. 1986. Communication exolingue extrême: Stratégies de communication entre autochtones et immigrés débutants dans la langue. In Giacalone-Ramat, A. (ed.), L'apprendimiento spontaneo di una seconda lingua. Bologne: II Molino.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.). 1980. Discourse analysis in second language research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. 1983. Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5;177–93.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 1983. Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one kind of simplification. In R. Andersen (ed.), pp. 120–57.Google Scholar
Mittner, M. 1984. Stratégies discursives, variabilité et situations de communication. In Extra, G. & Mittner, M. (eds.). Studies in second language acquisition by adult immigrants, pp. 83–112. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Noyau, C. 1984. Communiquer quand on ignore la langue de l'autre. In Noyau, C. & Porquier, R. (eds.), Communiquer dans la langue de l'autre, pp. 8–36. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. 1986. Understanding and misunderstanding in adult language acquisition: Recent work on the E.S.F. Project. In Lüdi, G. (ed.), Devenir bilingue, parler bilingue. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
Porquier, R. 1984. Communication exolingue et apprentissage des langues. In Py, B. (ed.). Acquisition d'une langue étrangère III, pp. 17–47. Paris, Neuchâtel: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes et C.L.A. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Py, B. & Alber, J. L.. 1984. Interlangue et communication exolingue. Bulletin de la Section Linguistique de la Faculté des Lettres de Lausanne 6;217–34.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1984. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. 1978. The pidginization process: A model for second language acquistion. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1982. Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language acquisition: The stale of the art, pp. 128–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slutzki, C. & Beavin, J.. 1981. Symétrie et complémentarité: Une définition opérationnelle et typologique des dyades. In Watzlawick, P. & Weakland, J. (eds.), Sur l'interaction, pp. 98–117. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Trévise, A. & de Heredia, C.. 1984. Les malentendus: Effets de loupe sur certains phénomènes d'acquisition d'une langue étrangère. In Noyau, C. & Porquier, R. (eds.), Communiquer dans la langue de l'autre, pp. 130–52. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Vion, R.. 1984. L'activité de reformulation dans les échanges entre linguistes et apprenants non-guidés. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference: Acquisition d'une Langue Étrangère, Aix en Provence.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, P. & Weakland, J. (eds.). 1981. Sur l'interaction. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar