Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:46:11.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis and Control in the Development of Second Language Proficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Ellen Bialystok
Ellen Bialystok
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a cognitive framework for explaining the acquisition and use of a second language. The framework is based on the identification of two cognitive processing components, called analysis of knowledge and control of processing, that jointly function to develop proficiency in the language. The framework is explained briefly and then applied to five issues in second language acquisition: the similarity of first and second language learning, the starting point for second language acquisition, consciousness, variability, and instruction.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 157 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connnectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing networks. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beretta, A. (1991). Theory construction in SLA: Complementarity and opposition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1988a). Aspects of linguistic awareness in reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 123–139.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1988b). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1991). Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. In Bialystok, E. (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 113–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1992). Attentional control in children's metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence. Developmental Psychology, 28, 654–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (in press-a). Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In Ellis, N. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (in press-b). Towards an explanation of second language acquisition. In Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., Pollitt, A., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Language and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Mitterer, J. (1987). Metalinguistic differences among three kinds of readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Sharwood, Smith M. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6, 101–117.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1988). Introduction. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., & Braine, M. D. S. (Eds.), Categories and processes in language acquisition (pp. 1–10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Case, R. (1991). The mind's staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children's thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1989). Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1978). Language-learner language. In Richards, J. C. (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning (pp. 71–93). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). A new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 253–278.Google Scholar
Enns, J. T. (1990). The development of attention: Research and theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. R. (1990). The variable competence model of second language acquisition, and why it isn't. Applied Linguistics, 11, 364–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. L. (1986). Society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli, L. A. (1993). Two components of metalinguistic awareness: Control of linguistic processing and analysis of linguistic knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 349–367.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 127–158.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar