Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T14:35:35.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China's Minority Nationalities in the Cultural Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

June Dreyer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Initialy, the Chinese Communist Government held high hopes for a speedy solution to “the nationalities question.” Recent events, however, show that this question is still much in evidence and has been causing considerable anxiety in Peking. Since the beginning of the Cultural Revolution, Red Guard exposures of “black bandits in power who are following a capitalist path” have revealed the existence of minorities problems which cast doubt on the régime's previous claims of progress. The Cultural Revolution has also revealed a split between those in the top leadership who favour concessions to the customs and traditions of the minorities and those who favour immediate and total assimilation. Since the former are generally experienced administrators while the latter are ideological zealots, this split may also be seen as yet another manifestation of the continuing “Red” versus “Expert” controversy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 35 , September 1968 , pp. 96 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brandt, , Schwartz, and Fairbank, , A Documentary History of Chinese Communism, New York, Atheneum, 1966, p. 217Google Scholar.

2 Now officially known as Yi. According to present propaganda “Lolo” was a derogatory term employed by the KMT and other repressive régimes purposely to demean the Yi and therefore much resented by them. Its use by Hsü here does little to substantiate the Communists' claim that immediately on entering an area they first learned the local people's customs, then became fast friends with them.

3 Wales, Nym, Red Dust, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1952, p. 71Google Scholar.

4 Author's italics. See Schram, Stuart, Mao Tse-tung, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1966, p. 248Google Scholar.

5 Different minority nationalities exhibited widely differing degrees of civilisation. The remote south-west contained slave-owning tribes who practised “slash and burn” cultivation. There were also other nationalities, such as the Chuang and the Manchus, who lived dispersed in Han areas and whose skills were virtually equal to those of the Han themselves. In general though, it is safe to say that the minorities were less advanced than the Han.

6 Min-tsu T'uan-chieh (hereafter cited as MTTC), No. 10, 1958, p. 25Google Scholar.

7 At this time, the minorities, in accord with the Party's policy of respect for their “special characteristics,” were at widely different stages of socialist development, ranging all the way from Tibetans, who had not yet begun democratic reforms, through Mongolian herdsmen's lower-level co-operatives, to the Chuang, whose higher-level co-ops, were the equivalent of any formed by Han.

8 MTTC, No. 7, 1958, p. 22Google Scholar.

9 MTTC, No. 8, 1958, p. 15Google Scholar.

10 MTTC, No. 3, 1959, p. 2Google Scholar.

11 e.g., the T'ai, MTTC, No. 7, 1959, pp. 37–38Google Scholar.

12 MTTC, No. 8, 1959, p. 1Google Scholar and passim.

13 It officially became an autonomous region in September 1965.

14 MTTC, No. 10, 1959, p. 29Google Scholar.

15 MTTC, No. 6, 1959, p. 15Google Scholar.

16 Radio Hunan, 13 April 1968.

17 Standard (Hong Kong), 27 01 1967Google Scholar.

18 Survey of the China Mainland Press (hereafter cited as SCMP), 4057, 4 November 1967.

19 Radio Huhehot, 12 January 1968.

20 See Ch'ün, Tsung, “Cradle of Minority Cadres: Recalling the Yenan Nationalities Academy,” MTTC, No. 7, 1961, pp. 15–19Google Scholar.

21 Radio Huhehot, 12 January 1961.

22 SCMP, 4057, 4 November 1967.

23 Radio Huhehot, 1 November 1967.

24 Ibid. 8 November 1967.

25 Ibid. 20 November 1967.

26 See ibid. 12 April 1968, and South China Morning Post (Hong Kong), 25 06 1968, p. 1Google Scholar.

27 SCMP, S–219, 27 January 1967; SCMP, S–204, 12 February 1967.

28 New York Times (New York), 10 05 1967Google Scholar.

29 SCMP, 4181, 20 May 1968.

30 sCMP, 4086, 22 December 1967.

31 New York Times (New York), 10 09 1967Google Scholar.

32 Peking Informers, 16 April 1968, pp. 9–10.

32a Since this article was written a Revolutionary Committee has been set up in Tibet; on 5 September.

33 SCMP, 4057, 7 November 1967.

34 Radio Kansu, 25 January 1968.

35 See, e.g., Wang's, editorial in Min-tsu T'uan-chieh, Nos. 10–11, 1961, pp. 2–8Google Scholar, in which he argues against those who would abolish autonomous regions and special consideration for minority characteristics.

36 Most probably the Tulung Valley area of south-western Yunnan. An NCNA release of 5 May 1968 mentions the visit of “a certain person from higher levels” to this area after “the bad years of 1959–61” and his capitalist conclusion that private ownership here would have to last a long time.

37 Radio Kunming, 30 November 1967.

38 Klochko, Mikhail, Soviet Scientist in Red China, New York, Praeger, 1964, p. 145Google Scholar.

39 “Tribesmen Bored by Mao's Quotations,” Bangkok (Reuters), in South China Morning Post (Hong Kong), 30 10 1967Google Scholar.

40 See, e.g., “400,000 Anti-Reds,” Free China Weekly, 7 May 1967, and “Maoist Rebels Flee to Burma,” Standard (Hong Kong), 18 04 1968Google Scholar.

41 See, e.g., Jones, P. M. H., “Autonomous Wang,” FEER, 28 12 1967, pp. 569–570Google Scholar.

42 Radio Tashkent, 19 October 1967.

43 Dymkov, A., “Peking Chauvinists,” Izvestiya, 04 1967, p. 3Google Scholar, in Current Digest of the Soviet Press, Vol. 19, No. 13, p. 21.

44 Radio Urumchi, II February 1967.

45 Ceteka, 1 March 1967.

46 SCMP, 4081, 15 December 1967

47 SCMP, 4151, 2 April 1968.