Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:36:32.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Regulation in the People's Republic of China: The Face of Domestic Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Michael Palmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the post-Mao era, one highly significant dimension of China's official programme of reform and integration into the international economy has been a commitment to legal construction. This commitment has included a sustained effort to fashion a basic corpus of environmental protection law alongside supportive institutions, administrative norms and policies, in order to create a “basic legal system of environmental protection” (huanjing baohu de jiben falii zhidu).' In the eyes of the authorities in the People's Republic of China, such efforts reflect a degree of environmental concern that is unusually strong for a developing society.2 China's achievements, we are often told, must be placed in the context of the considerable difficulties the PRC faces in terms of the pressing need to raise living standards, a serious problem of over-population, a shortage of natural resources, an outdated industrial infrastructure and poor industrial management.3 Of course, viewed comparatively, the PRC's embrace of environmental protection law was somewhat belated,4 only properly commencing after its participation in the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm. The subsequent expansion of environmental legislation and enforcement has been some-what erratic. Nevertheless, there appears to be a continuing intent to fashion a substantial body of environmental law, and concern with the construction and revision of this was further enhanced by China's participation in the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro. Following this, Premier Li Peng “made a commitment to conscientiously implement resolutions adopted at the Conference”5 and, given the PRC's very substantial size and population, a positive embrace of internationally acceptable standards of environmental welfare is highly significant for future global environmental protection. This article examines the principal features and significance of the PRC's domestic environmental protection law, and considers briefly the implications of the Chinese approach to environmental law for understanding the development of law more generally in post-Mao China.

Type
China's Environment
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 156 , December 1998 , pp. 788 - 808
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jin, Wang, “Zhongguo huanjing baohu de jiben falu zhidu” (“The basic legal system of environmental protection in China”), paper presented at the China-Europe Legal Seminar, Beijing, 13–14 11 1997, p. 1Google Scholar.

2. In particular, the PRC's commitment is reflected in the fact that the Environmental Protection Law 1979 (for trial use) was one of the seven major law codes promulgated by the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee after the decision by the Chinese leadership to revert to more orthodox modes of legal development and to govern through a “rule of law.” This raft of legislation was thus regarded as a symbol of the beginning of a new era of legal construction, and it is particularly significant that environmental protection was one of the areas of social life to be given priority in the legislative programme. In addition, at the second national working conference on environmental protection held in 1983, environmental protection was made a basic national policy (jiben guoce) – see Chaofci, Yang, Huanjing baohu yu huanjing wenhua (Environmental Protection and Environmental Culture) (Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe, 1994), p. 6Google Scholar.

3. Jin, Wang, “The basic legal system of environmental protection in China”, p. 1Google Scholar.

4. That is, it only effectively commenced in the mid-1970s, significantly later than many Western societies that were already beginning to address environmental issues in a sustained manner in the 1960s.

5. China's Agenda 21 – While Paper on China's Population, Environment, and Development in the 21st Century (Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1994), p. 2Google Scholar.

6. Suilin, Jin, Huanjing faxue (Environmental Law) (Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1990), p. 51Google Scholar

7. Sec Zitai, Zhang, Huanjing baohufa (Environmental Protection Law) (Nanjing: Hehai daxuc chubanshe, 1994), pp. 20–21Google Scholar, and Huihan, Luo, Huanjing faxue (Environmental Law) (Guangdong: Zhongshan daxue chubanshe, 1986), pp. 23–24Google Scholar.

8. See, for example, Goldblatt, David, Social Theory and the Environment (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 5–6, 9–11Google Scholar, and Harvey, David, Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Oxford: Blackwcll, 1986), pp. 197–204Google Scholar.

9. See, for example, MacFarquhar, Roderick, Check, Timothy and Wu, Eugene, The Secret Speeches of Chairman Mao (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 379, 384Google Scholar.

10. Sec, for example, Zedong, Mao, “Introducing a co-operative,” in Selected Readings from the Works of Mao Tsetung (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1971), pp. 499–501, especially editorial note 1 at pp. 500–501Google Scholar.

11. As Schwartz has pointed out, this had been preceded by the enthusiastic campaign against the Four Pests in which a “war” was waged against rats, (lies, mosquitoes and sparrows - see Schwartz, Benjamin I., “Thoughts on the late Mao – between total redemption and utter frustration,” in MacFarquhar, , Cheek, and Wu, , The Secret Speeches of Chairman Mao, p. 33Google Scholar. The mass extermination of the latter, however, permitted other insect pests to burgeon and in 1960 sparrows were replaced by bedbugs as a target – see ibid. p. 379. The official view of the environmental impact of the Maoist approach may be illustrated as follows: “such stupidities as draining lakes and ponds, building dykes in the sea, cutting down forests and destroying pastureland in order to reclaim land for planting grain ended up causing inestimable damage to forestry, animal husbandry and fishery. Grave imbalances appeared in the rural economy and the natural ecology” (Hanxian, Luo, Economic Changes in Rural China (Beijing: New World Press, 1985, lr. Wang Huimin), p. 92)Google Scholar.

12. Suilin, Jin, Environmental Law, pp. 52–53Google Scholar. The renewed concern for protecting the environment was further reflected in the creation in May 1974 of a specific organ for environmental welfare, the Environmental Protection Leading Group (Guowuyuan huanjing baohu lingdao xiaozu) which drew for its membership on a wide range of government departments and commissions and operated under the leadership of the State Council. The latter body introduced a number of environmentally relevant provisions including the above-mentioned 1974 Provisional Regulations on the Prevention of Pollution of Coastal Waters, and a number of environmental standards for such objects as industrial emissions, drinking water and food. Together with its Office (bangongshi), this Group became the Bureau or Agency of Environmental Protection (Huanjing baohu ju) in 1982: see Chaofei, Yang, Environmental Protection and Environmental Culture, p. 32Google Scholar.

13. Brundtland, G. H., Our Common Future – the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 8Google Scholar. Sec also the discussion of “sustainable development” (chixu fazhan) in Suilin, Jin, Environmental Law, pp. 94–97Google Scholar.

14. See, for example, Kunmin, Zhang and Suilin, Jin, Huanjing baohufajianghua (A Guide to Environmental Law) (Beijing: Qinghua daxue chubanshe, 1990), pp. 20–26Google Scholar.

15. See, for example, Peng, Li, “Preface,” in China's Agenda 21 – White Paper on China's Population, Environment, and Development in the 21st Century, p. 2Google Scholar.

16. Chapter 3: “Legislation for sustainable development and its enforcement,” in China's Agenda 21—White Paper on China's Population, Environment, and Development in the 21st Century, pp. 14–21.

17. Chaofci, Yang, Environmental Protection and Environmental Culture, p. 6Google Scholar.

18. Dcpci, Han and Longan, Xiao (eds.), Huanjing baohu fa jiben zhishi (Basic Knowledge of Environmental Law) (Beijing: Zhongguo huanjing kcxuc chubanshe, 1990), pp. 62–63Google Scholar.

19. Except at the township level, where environmental welfare is often the concern of an appointed “environmental protector.”

20. See Clarke, Donald, “The execution of civil judgments in China,” in Lubman, Stanley B. (ed.), China's Legal Reforms (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar for an insightful analysis of the impact of local court funding on judicial work in enforcement.

21. Songqiao, Dong, “Yi fa baohu huanjing, jianshc meihao jiayuan” (“To protect the environment in line with the law and to beautify our homeland”), Zhongguo falu (China Law), No. 3 (1997), pp. 4–6, at p. 5Google Scholar. See also, more generally, Hong, Mei, “Legal gateways for environmental protection in China,” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 22–32Google Scholar.

22. “Shehui tuanti dengji guanli tiaoli” (“Regulations on the registration and administration of social organizations), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falu nianjian, Zhongguo falu nianjian 1990 (Law Yearbook of China 1990) (Beijing: Falu chubanshe, 1991), pp. 253–55Google Scholar. The law is currently undergoing revision, although the redrafting is apparently proving to be a difficult process because of the political sensitivity of such legislation.

23. “Zhonghua renmin gonghcguo zhi'an guanli chufa tiaoli” (“Regulations of the PRC on administrative penalties for public security”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falii nianjian, Zhongguo falii nianjian 1995 (Law Yearbook of China 1995) (Beijing: Falii chubanshc, 1995), pp. 169–174Google Scholar.

24. Songqiao, Dong, “To protect the environment in line with the law and to beautify our homeland,” p. 5Google Scholar.

25. “Zhonghua renmin gongheguo minfa tongze” (“General principles of the civil law”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falü nianjian, Zhongguo falü nianjian 1987 (Law Yearbook of China 1987) (Beijing: Falii chubanshe, 1987), pp. 68–76Google Scholar.

26. “Zhonghua renmin gongheguo xingfa” (“Criminal law”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falü nianjian, Law Yearbook of China 1987, pp. 142–151Google Scholar.

27. For example, the 1988 Supplementary Provisions of the Standing Committee of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Concerning the Punishment of the Crimes of Catching or Killing Precious and Endangered Species of Wildlife Under Special State Protection.

28. “Shanghai shi huanjing baohu tiaoli 1995” (“Regulations of Shanghai municipality for environmental protection”), China Economic News, 10 April 1995 (Supplement No. 2).

29. “1994 Xiamen shi huanjing baohu tiaoli” (“Regulations of Xiamen municipality for environmental protection”), Xiamen shi renda weiyuanhui bangongting, Xiamen shi renda wciyuanhui yanjiushi (compilers), Xiamen shi difangfagui huipian (1994–1995) (Collected Regulations of Xiamen Municipality (1994–1995)).

30. “Enterprises and institutions discharging pollutants in excess of the prescribed national or local discharge standards shall pay a fee for excessive discharge…and shall assume responsibility for eliminating and controlling the pollution.”

31. “An enterprise or institution that has failed to eliminate or control pollution by the deadline as required shall…pay an excessive discharge fee; in addition, a fine may be imposed on it on the basis of the damage incurred, or the enterprise may be ordered to suspend its operations or close down.”

32. “A unit that has caused an environmental pollution hazard has the obligation to eliminate that hazard and to make compensation to the unit or individual that has suffered direct losses.”

33. “Zhonghua renmin gongheguo shui wuran fangzhi fa, 1996” (“Prevention of water pollution law of the PRC, 1996”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falii nianjian, Zhongguofalü nianjian 1997 (Law Yearbook of China 1997) (Beijing: Falii chubanshc, 1997), pp. 272–76Google Scholar.

34. Songqiao, Dong, “To protect the environment in line with the law and to beautify our homeland,” p. 5Google Scholar.

35. Among the most important administrative rules arc the 1986 Provisions on Environmental Protection Management in Capital Construction Projects, the 1990 Administrative Measures for Supervising Pollution by Exhaust Fumes from Automobiles, the 1991 Implementing Provisions on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution, the 1992 Measures on Administrative Penalties for Environmental Protection, and the 1992 Administrative Measures for Marks of Environmental Supervision and Management and Enforcement of Law.

36. For a general account of the process of dispute transformation see Felstincr, William, Abel, Richard and Sarat, Austin, “The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming,” Law and Society Review, Vol. 15 (1980–1981), pp. 631 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar. Sec also Palmer, Michael and Roberts, Simon, Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making (London: Butterworths, 1998), pp. 7–14Google Scholar.

37. “Quanguo renda changweihui guanyu chengzhi busha guojia zhongdian baohu dc zhengui pinwei yesheng dongwu fanzui dc buchong guiding, 1988” (“Supplementary provisions of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on punishment for the crimes of killing precious wild animals and endangered species, 1988”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falii nianjian, Zhongguo falii nianjian 1989 (Law Yearbook of China 1989) (Beijing: Falü chubanshe, 1990), p. 137Google Scholar.

38. “Xingzheng fuyi tiaoli, 1990” (”Administrative review regulations, 1990”), in bianjibu, Zhongguo falü nianjian, Zhongguo falünianjian 1991 (Law Yearbook of China 1991) (Beijing: Falü chubanshe, 1992), pp. 252–56Google Scholar.

39. Arbitration proper is another possible mode of proceeding in civil cases, and there have been some calls in the Chinese legal press for the establishment of special arbitral bodies that would deal with environmental issues. However, at the moment, formal arbitration is only used in the PRC in cases of foreign-related ocean pollution – the arbitral body in such cases is the China Maritime Association Commission, and the governing law is ordinarily the 1982 Marine Environmental Protection Law and the Maritime Arbitration Rules.

40. See, for example, Robinson, David and Dunkley, John (eds.), Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law (London: Wiley Chancery, 1995)Google Scholar.

41. See Note, “Class action litigation in China,” Harvard Law Review, Vol. III (1998), pp. 1523–1541Google Scholar.

42. See Palmer, Michael “The revival of mediation in the People's Republic of China: (2) judicial mediation,” in Butler, W. E. (ed.), Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems 1988 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Books, 1989)Google Scholar.

43. Sec, for example, Palmer, Michael “The revival of mediation in the People's Republic of China: (1) extra-judicial mediation,” in Butler, W. E. (ed.), Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems 1987 (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Books, 1988)Google Scholar.

44. On the concept of “polycentric dispute” sec Fuller, Lon, “Mediation – its forms and functions,” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 44 (1971), pp. 305–339Google Scholar.

45. “Zhonghua renmin gongheguo liishi fa, 1996” (“Lawyers' Law of the PRC, 1997”) in force 1 01 1997, in bianjibu, Zhongguo falü nianjian, Zhongguo falü nianjian 1996 (Law Yearbook of China 1996) (Beijing: Falü chubanshc, 1997), pp. 276–280Google Scholar.

46. Songqiao, Dong, “To protect the environment in line with the law and to beautify our homeland,” pp. 4–6, at p. 6Google Scholar.

47. Sec above, note 2.

47. Songqiao, Dong, “To protect the environment in line with the law and to beautify our homeland,” pp. 4–6, at p. 6Google Scholar.