Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T06:00:35.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information seeking behaviour in image retrieval: VISOR I final report Lynne R. Conniss, A. Julie Ashford and Margaret E. Graham Newcastle upon Tyne: Institute for Image Data Research, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, 2000. (Library and Information Commission Research Report 95) 147 p.: ill. ISBN 1861350511 (pa.) £25.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Henry Pisciotta
Henry Pisciotta*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Libraries, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 2002 , pp. 46 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For information on the Institute see: http://www.unn.ac.uk/iidr/ Google Scholar
2. The most notable examples in the arts being: Stephenson, Christie and McClung, Patricia. Images online: perspectives on the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project and Delivering digital images: cultural heritage resources for education. Both were published by the Getty Information Institute in 1998. Reviewed in Art libraries journal vol. 24 no. 4 1999, p.55–58.Google Scholar
3. See the explanation of framework analysis in: Ritchie, Jane and Spencer, Liz. ‘Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research’ in: Bryman, Alan and Burgess, Robert G., eds. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994, p. 174.Google Scholar