Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T16:44:10.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origin and Diffusion of the Myotonic Dystrophy Gene in the Saguenay Region (Quebec)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Gérard Bouchard*
Affiliation:
SOREP, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi
Raymond Roy
Affiliation:
SOREP, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi
Manon Declos
Affiliation:
Statistics Canada, Ottawa
Jean Mathieu
Affiliation:
Chicoutimi Hospital Muscular Dystrophy Clinic
Kevork Kouladjian
Affiliation:
SOREP, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi
*
SOREP, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Boulevard de l'Université, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada G7H 2B1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A very high prevalence (approximately 1/475 in 1985) of myotonic dystrophy (Steinert disease) is observed in the Saguenay region, which is located in the north-east part of the Province of Quebec. For various reasons, however, the literature on the subject generally associates a high degree of selective disadvantage with this gene, which seems to contradict the Saguenay data. Using a computerized regional population register, we have reconstituted patients' genealogies and family biographies. We have thus been able to study the origin of the gene and to compare the demographic behavior of patients and controls. On the whole, patients seem to be very little disadvantaged compared to controls, in terms of reproduction as well as of geographical and occupational mobility.

Type
SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT Dystrophie myotonique au Québec
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1989

References

1.Bouchard, G, Roy, R, Casgrain, B. Reconstitution automatique des familles. Le système SOREP. Università du Québec é Chicoutimi, Dossier no. 2, 1985; 2 vol.Google Scholar
2.Kouladjian, K. SOREP Document 111-C-40. Méthode d’attestation des ancêtres atteints de la dystrophic de Steinert, à l’aide du registre de la population saguenayenne, 1985.Google Scholar
3.Roy, R, Decios, M, Bouchard, G, et al. La reproduction démo-graphique des familles touchées par la dystrophie de Steinert au Saguenay. Genus 1988; 18851971.Google Scholar
4.Harper, PS. Myotonic dystrophy. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1979.Google Scholar
5.Marcoz, JP. Dépistage des hétérozygotes dans une grande famille atteinte de maladie de Steinert aux manifestations cliniques variées. J Gen Hum 1978; 26: 237274.Google Scholar
6.Tome, FMS, Fardeau, M. Dystrophie myotonique de Steinert, Encyclopédie Méd. Chir., Paris, Neurologie 1976; 1: 7584.Google Scholar
7.Penrose, LS. The problems of anticipation in pedigrees of dys-trophia myotonica. Ann Eugen 1948; 14: 125132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Robert, JM, Pernod, J. Etude généalogique de la maladie de Steinert. A Genealogical Study of Steinert Disease. J Gen Hum 1976; 24: 143151.Google Scholar
9.Veillette, S, Perron, M, Desbiens, F. La dystrophie myotonique: étude épidémiologique et socio-démographique au Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean. Rapport de recherche. Cégep de Jonquière 1986; 241 pages.Google Scholar
10.Crow, JF, Kimura, M. An introduction to population genetics theory. New York, Evanston and London: Harper & Row, Publishers 1970; chapter 5.Google Scholar
11.McCluer, JW. The simulation of human fertility; strategy in demo-graphic modeling, In: Mielke, JH, Crawford, MH, eds. Current Developments in Anthropological Genetics, vol. 1. New York and London: Plenum Press 1980; 111131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar