Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T12:57:08.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Model for Teaching Writing in Large Introductory Political Science Classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Adele S. Pittendrigh
Affiliation:
Department of English, Montana State University
Jerry W. Calvert
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Montana State University

Extract

For the past two years as part of the Writing Center's writing-across-the-curriculum project at Montana State University, we have been experimenting with writing assignments in an introductory American government class with an enrollment of 130-150 students per quarter. We think we have developed a way to assign and teach persuasive writing in large introductory political science classes that helps students argue effectively but does not create a grading nightmare for the professor.

In the Spring 1988 issue of The Political Science Teacher, Richard A. Brumback notes that students are entering graduate school without the ability to write effectively. Brumback calls for instruction in writing, particularly persuasive writing, in public administration curricula. “The science of public administration can only take us as far as systematizing our search for information. Effective evaluation and interpretation of that information rests in the ability to use it persuasively.” Professor Brumback's argument should be extended to undergraduate education in political science. English departments alone cannot do the job of teaching students to write well in all disciplines, especially when they have students for just one or two writing courses. Students need to write often in a variety of disciplines if they are going to write well when they graduate.

There are other reasons, besides helping students develop writing skills, for assigning writing in undergraduate courses. Writing about course content makes students think. It gives them a chance to apply the concepts and methods of the discipline and to interpret and evaluate information. It also helps them see themselves more as active learners, less as passive receptors whose job it is to absorb information, memorize it, and repeat it on tests.

Type
For the Classroom
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. For further discussion of teaching argumentation see Bean, John C. and Ramage, John D., Form and Surprise in Composition: Writing and Thinking Across the Curriculum, MacMillan Publishing Company, 1986 Google Scholar.