Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:45:19.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Delayed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children after cardiac surgery: two-institution experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2013

Punkaj Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States of America
Rahul DasGupta
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States of America
Derek Best
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Craig B. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Residency Program, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States of America
Hassan Elsalloukh
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Arkansas, United States of America
Jeffrey M. Gossett
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States of America
Michiaki Imamura
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiothroacic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States of America
Warwick Butt
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
*
Correspondence to: P. Gupta, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sections of Pediatric Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 1 Children’s Way, Slot 512-3, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America. Tel: (501) 364-1479; Fax: (501) 364-3667; E-mail: pgupta2@uams.edu

Abstract

Objective: There are limited data on the outcomes of children receiving delayed (≥7 days) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery. The primary aim of this project is to identify the aetiology and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children receiving delayed (≥7 days) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all children ≤18 years supported with delayed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery between the period January, 2001 and March, 2012 at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital, United States of America, and Royal Children’s Hospital, Australia. The data collected in our study included patient demographic information, diagnoses, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation indication, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support details, medical and surgical history, laboratory, microbiological, and radiographic data, information on organ dysfunction, complications, and patient outcomes. The outcome variables evaluated in this report included: survival to hospital discharge and current survival with emphasis on neurological, renal, pulmonary, and other end-organ function. Results: During the study period, 423 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at two institutions, with a survival of 232 patients (55%). Of these, 371 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation <7 days after cardiac surgery, with a survival of 205 (55%) patients, and 52 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ≥7 days after cardiac surgery, with a survival of 27 (52%) patients. The median duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run for the study cohort was 5 days (interquartile range: 3, 10). In all, 14 patients (25%) received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation with chest compressions. There were 24 patients (44%) who received dialysis while being on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There were eight patients (15%) who had positive blood cultures and four patients (7%) who had positive urine cultures while being on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There were nine patients (16%) who had bleeding complications associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs. There were 10 patients (18%) who had cerebrovascular thromboembolic events associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs. Of these, 19 patients are still alive with significant comorbidities. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that mortality outcomes are comparable among children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ≥7 days and <7 days after cardiac surgery. The proportion of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ≥7 days is small and the aetiology diverse.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright &#x00A9; Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shen, I, Ungerleider, RM. Routine use of mechanical ventricular assist following the Norwood procedure. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2004; 7: 1621.Google Scholar
2. Carmichael, TB, Walsh, EP, Roth, SJ. Anticipatory use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for a high-risk interventional cardiac procedure. Respir Care 2002; 47: 1002 1006.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Ungerleider, RM, Shen, I, Yeh, T, et al. Routine mechanical ventricular assist following the Norwood procedure – improved neurologic outcome and excellent hospital survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1822.Google Scholar
4. Baffes, TG, Fridman, JL, Bicoff, JP, Whitehill, JL. Extracorporeal circulation for support of palliative cardiac surgery in infants. Ann Thorac Surg 1970; 4: 354363.Google Scholar
5. Duncan, BW, Hraska, V, Jonas, RA, et al. Mechanical circulatory support in children with cardiac disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 529542.Google Scholar
6. Kulik, TJ, Moler, FW, Palmisano, JM, et al. Outcome associated factors in pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenator after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1996; 94: 6368.Google Scholar
7. Alsoufi, B, Al-Radi, OO, Gruenwald, C, et al. Extracorporeal life support following cardiac surgery in children: analysis of risk factors and survival in a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 10041011.Google Scholar
8. Chaturvedi, RR, Macrae, D, Brown, KL, et al. Cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for biventricular hearts after paediatric open heart surgery. Heart 2004; 90: 545551.Google Scholar
9. Black, MD, Coles, JG, Williams, WG, et al. Determinants of success in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 133138.Google Scholar
10. Kolovos, NS, Bratton, SL, Moler, FW, et al. Outcome of pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal life support after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 14351441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Walters, HL, Hakimi, M, Rice, MD, Lyons, JM, Whittlesey, GC, Klein, MD. Pediatric cardiac surgical extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: multivariate analysis of risk factors for hospital death. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 329337.Google Scholar
12. Ravishankar, C, Dominguez, TE, Kreutzer, J, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after stage I reconstruction for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7: 319326.Google Scholar
13. DA, Kane, Thiagarajan, RR, Wypij, D, et al. Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children with cardiac disease. Circulation 2010; 122: S241S248.Google Scholar
14. Gupta, P, McDonald, R, Chipman, CW, et al. 20-year experience of prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill children with cardiac or pulmonary failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 15841590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Ungerleider, RM, Shen, I, Burch, G, et al. Use of routine ventricular assist following the first stage Norwood procedure. Cardiol Young 2004; 14 (Suppl 1): 6164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Booth, KL, Roth, SJ, Laussen, PC, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support of the Fontan and bidirectional Glenn circulations. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 13411348.Google Scholar
17. Laforte, A, Walter, EMD, Hetzer, R, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for intraoperative cardiac support in children with congenital heart disease. Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10: 753758.Google Scholar
18. Wright, GE, Crowley, DC, Charpie, JR, Ohye, RG, Bove, EL, Kulik, TJ. High systemic vascular resistance and sudden cardiovascular collapse in recovering Norwood patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 4852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Agarwal, HS, Hardison, DC, Saville, BR, et al. Residual lesions in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
20. Gupta, P, McDonald, R, Gossett, JM, et al. A single center experience of extubation failure in infants undergoing the Norwood operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 12621268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Wang, J, Han, J, Jia, Y, et al. Early and intermediate results of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 18971903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Hemmila, MR, Rowe, SA, Boules, TN, et al. Extracorporeal life support for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 595605; discussion 605–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Hsu, MS, Chiu, KM, Huang, YT, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infection during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Hosp Infect 2009; 73: 210216.Google Scholar
24. Burket, JS, Bartlett, RH, Vander Hyde, K, et al. Nosocomial infections in adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28: 828833.Google Scholar
25. Hervey-Jumper, SL, Annich, GM, Yancon, AR, Garton, HJ, Muraszko, KM, Maher, CO. Neurological complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7: 338344.Google Scholar