Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T23:18:45.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computerized Perceptual Analysis of Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Abstract

Many factors influence the development of body image, one of which is the perception we have of our body. Perception can refer to actual visual input or the interpretation of vision; in other words, cognitive appraisal. The goal of this preliminary study is to determine if three groups (body dysmorphic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and a non-psychiatric control group) differed in the perception of their faces. Thirty individuals, 10 in each group, were asked to make changes to a computerized image of their face. In addition, affective and perceptual tests were administered. The groups did not differ on affective and perceptual organizational measures, although the obsessive-compulsive disorder group reported a higher level of anxiety than the body dysmorphic disorder group. Imaging software showed that facial features were modified by patients with body dysmorphic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder in about 50% of cases. No modifications were made in the control group. Future studies need to investigate the possible causes of these differences.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cumming, WJ. The neurobiology of the body schema. B J Psychiatry Suppl. 1988;153(suppl 2):711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jackson, JH. Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson. Vol. 2. London, England: Hodderand Stoughton; 1932.Google Scholar
3.Lashley, KS. Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. London, England: Ward, Lock and Co.; 1891.Google Scholar
4.Luria, AR. Las funciones corticales superiores del Hombre. La Habana, Cuba: Orbe; 1977.Google Scholar
5.Mesulam, MM. Principles of behavioral neurology. In: Patterns in Behavioral Neuroanatomy: Association Areas, the Limbic System, and Hemispheric Specialization. Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis Co.; 1985.Google Scholar
6.Trivedi, MH. Functional neuroanatomy of obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57(suppl 8):2635.Google ScholarPubMed
7.First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Clinician Version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
8.Psychological Assessment Resources. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer Version 3 for Windows. Research ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.Google Scholar
9.The Psychological Corporation. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1997.Google Scholar
10.Beck, AT, Steer, RA, Brown, G. The Brown Depression Inventory. 2nd ed. San Antonio, Tex: Harcourt Brace & Company; 1996.Google Scholar
11.Beck, AT, Epstein, N, Brown, G, Steer, RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Goodman, WK, Price, LH, Rasmussen, SA, et al.The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:10061011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Phillips, KA., Hollander, E, Rasmussen, SA, Aronowitz, BR, DeCaria, C, Goodman, WK. A severity rating scale for body dysmorphic disorder: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33:1722.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Veale, D, Gournay, K, Dryden, W, Boocock, A, Shah, F, Wilson, R, Walburn, J. Body dysmorphic disorder: a cognitive-behavioral model and pilot randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:717729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Concar, D. Sex and the symmetrical body. New Sci. 1995;146:4046.Google Scholar