Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T20:46:11.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Decision Making and DDT Production at Montrose Chemical Corporation of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Terence Kehoe  and
Charles Jacobson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we examine the decisions made by corporate executives and government officials that led to the discharge with minimal treatment of hundreds of metric tons of dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) waste into the Pacific Ocean over several decades. After World War II, Montrose Chemical Corporation of California's Los Angeles plant began making the new wonder pesticide, and Montrose executives worked with local officials to develop a waste disposal system that funneled the plant's process wastes into the county sewer system and ultimately into the ocean. Faced with increasing scientific concern about pesticides and a changed political climate in the 1960s, Montrose vigorously defended DDT and relied increasingly on exports to remain profitable. Years after the plant closed, a federal suit forced Montrose and related companies to pay the costs of environmental cleanup.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 640 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2003. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Bosso, Christopher J. Pesticides and Politics: The Life Cycle of a Public Issue. Pittsburgh, Pa., 1987.Google Scholar
Cannon, James S., and Halloran, Jean M.. Environmental Steel: Pollution in the Iron and Steel Industry. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Boston, 1962.Google Scholar
Colten, Craig E., and Skinner, Peter N.. The Road to Love Canal. Austin, Texas, 1996.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Thomas R. DDT: Scientists, Citizens and Public Policy. Princeton, N.J., 1981.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis, and Pratt, Joseph. The Rise of the Corporate Commonwealth: U.S. Business and Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Hadwiger, Don F. The Politics of Agricultural Research. Lincoln, Nebr., 1982.Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel P. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A., and Kenly, John Smith, Jr. Science and Corporate Strategy: Dupont R & D, 1902-1980. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Huffman, Thomas R. Protectors of the Land and Water: Environmentalism in Wisconsin, 1961-1968. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1994.Google Scholar
The Industrial Directory of New Jersey, 1943-44. Union City, N.J., 1944.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Terence. Cleaning Up the Great Lakes: From Cooperation to Confrontation. DeKalb, 1ll., 1997.Google Scholar
Kerlin, Gregg, and Rabovsky, Daniel. Cracking Down: Oil Refining and Pollution Control. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Lawless, Edward W., Rumker, Rosmarie von, and Ferguson, Thomas L..Google Scholar
The Pollution Potential in Pesticide Manufacturing. Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
Lear, Linda. Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature. New York, 1997.Google Scholar
McQuaid, Kim. Uneasy Partners: Big Business in American Politics, 1945-1990. Baltimore, Md., 1994.Google Scholar
Melosi, Martin V. The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present. Baltimore, Md., 2000.Google Scholar
Opie, John. Nature’s Nation: An Environmental History of the United States. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Rice, Richard B., Bullough, William A., and Orsi, Richard J.. The Elusive Eden: A New History of California, 2d ed. 1988; New York, 1996.Google Scholar
Russell, Edmund P. War and Nature: Fighting Humans and Insects with Chemicals from World War I to Silent Spring. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Sicilia, David, and Dyer, Davis. Labors of a Modern Hercules: The Evolution of a Chemical Company. Boston, 1990.Google Scholar
Whorton, James. Before Silent Spring: Pesticides and Public Health in Pre-DDT America. Princeton, N.J., 1974.Google Scholar
Wood, Samuel E., and Heller, Alfred E.. California Going, Going. . . Sacramento, Calif., 1962.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Knipling, E. F. “Insect Control Investigations of the Orlando, Fla., Laboratory during World War II.” In Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for the Year Ended June 30, 1948. Washington, D.C., 1948, pp. 331-48.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Angus A. “Why Pesticides Received Extensive Use in America: A Political Economy of Agricultural Pest Management to 1970.” Natural Resources Journal 27 (Summer 1987): 533–78.Google Scholar
Rosen, Christine M. “Industrial Ecology and the Greening of Business History.” Business and Economic History 26 (Fall 1997): 123–37.Google Scholar
Russell, Edmund P. “The Strange Career of DDT: Experts, Federal Capacity, and ‘Environmentalism’ in World War II.” Technology and Culture 40 (Oct. 1999): 770–96.Google Scholar
Sicilia, David. “Distant Proximity: Writing the History of American Business since 1945.” Business and Economic History 26 (Fall 1997): 266–81.Google Scholar
Tarr, Joel A. “The Search for the Ultimate Sink: Urban Air, Land, and Water Pollution in Historical Perspective.” In The Search for the Ultimate Sink: Urban Pollution in Historical Perspective, ed. Tarr, Joel A.. Akron, Ohio, 1996, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar

Government Documents

Congressional Record.Google Scholar
Eichers, Theodore, Robert Jenkins, and Austin Fox. “DDT Used in Farm Production.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 158.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. “Consolidated DDT Hearings: Hearing Examiner’s Recommended Findings, Conclusion, and Orders.” 25 April 1972.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides Regulation Division. PR Notice 71-1. 15 Jan. 1971.Google Scholar
Report of the Secretary’s Commission on Pesticides and Their Relationship to Environmental Health. Washington, D.C., 1969.Google Scholar
U.S.Congress, Senate, S.. Water Pollution Control—1966: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Air and Water Pollution of the Committee on Public Works. 89th Cong., 2d sess., April-May 1966.Google Scholar
Use of Pesticides: A Report of the President’s Science Advisory Committee. Washington, D.C., 1963.Google Scholar

Newspapers, Magazines, and Trade Journals

Agricultural Chemicals. 1964.Google Scholar
Business Week. 1949, 1972.Google Scholar
Chemical and Engineering News. 1967, 1971.Google Scholar
Chemistry and Industry. 1955.Google Scholar
Chemical Week. 1964.Google Scholar
Consumer Reports. 1949. Federal Register. 1972.Google Scholar
Harper’s Magazine. 1945.Google Scholar
Journal of the American Water Works Association. 1945, 1965.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times. Oct. 1970, Oct. 2000.Google Scholar
Manufacturing Chemist. 1960.Google Scholar
Nature Magazine. 1945.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Journal. 1962.Google Scholar
Newsweek. 1972.Google Scholar
New York Times. May 1964; June and Oct. 1969; June, Aug., and Oct. 1970.Google Scholar
Popular Science. 1945.Google Scholar
Soap and Sanitary Chemicals. 1944, 1945.Google Scholar
Time. 1945, 1962.Google Scholar
Wastes Engineering. 1959.Google Scholar

Company and Trade Association Publications

Baldwin-Montrose Chemical Company, Annual Reports, 1961, 1963.Google Scholar
Montrose Chemical Company, Annual Reports, 1956, 1957, 1960.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Chemicals Association, Annual Reports, 1968, 1969.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Chemicals Association, Manual on Waste Disposal, June 1965.Google Scholar
NAC News and Pesticide Review, 1964, 1985, 1967.Google Scholar
Stauffer Chemical Company, Annual Reports, 1958, 1961.Google Scholar

Legal Documents

Counterclaims of Defendant, Counterclaimant, and Crossclaimant Montrose Chemical Corporation of California against the State of California, United States of America v. Montrose Chemical Corporation etal., 30 Sept. 1991.Google Scholar
Deposition of Samuel Rotrosen. United States of America etal. v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California etal., No. CV 90-3122. Oct. 1992.Google Scholar
Irell & Manella, LLP, document collection, Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
United States of America et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California etal., No. CV 90-3122-R, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, Trial Transcript, 17-18 Oct. 2000.Google Scholar

Archival Source

National Archives, Records of the War Production Board, RG 179, WPB Policy Documentation File.Google Scholar

Online Sources

“EDF Sues Major DDT Manufacturer in California,” EDF Newsletter, November 1970, URL: http://www.edf.org/pubs/Newsletter/1970/Nov/e_ddt.html, viewed May 2000.Google Scholar
EPA Region 9, “Cleaning up the Palos Verdes Shelf Timeline,” URL: http://www.epa.gov/region09/features/pvshelf/timeline.html, viewed Nov. 2002.Google Scholar
“Lawsuit Stops DDT Discharge into Pacific Ocean,” EDF Newsletter, July 1971, URL: http://www.edf.org/pubs/EDF-Letter/1971/Jul/a_stopddt.html, viewed Nov. 2001.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice News Release, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 19 Dec. 2000, URL: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2000/December/704enrd.htm, viewed Feb. 2002.Google Scholar