Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T04:18:45.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Normal forms for answer sets programming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2005

STEFANIA COSTANTINI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento d'Informatica, Università di L'Aquila, Loc. Coppito, L'Aquila I-67100, Italy (e-mail: stefcost@di.univaq.it
ALESSANDRO PROVETTI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Messina, Sal. Sperone 31, Messina I-98166, Italy (e-mail: ale@unime.it

Abstract

Normal forms for logic programs under stable/answer set semantics are introduced. We argue that these forms can simplify the study of program properties, mainly consistency. The first normal form, called the kernel of the program, is useful for studying existence and number of answer sets. A kernel program is composed of the atoms which are undefined in the Well-founded semantics, which are those that directly affect the existence of answer sets. The body of rules is composed of negative literals only. Thus, the kernel form tends to be significantly more compact than other formulations. Also, it is possible to check consistency of kernel programs in terms of colorings of the Extended Dependency Graph program representation which we previously developed. The second normal form is called 3-kernel. A 3-kernel program is composed of the atoms which are undefined in the Well-founded semantics. Rules in 3-kernel programs have at most two conditions, and each rule either belongs to a cycle, or defines a connection between cycles. 3-kernel programs may have positive conditions. The 3-kernel normal form is very useful for the static analysis of program consistency, i.e. the syntactic characterization of existence of answer sets. This result can be obtained thanks to a novel graph-like representation of programs, called Cycle Graph which presented in the companion article Costantini (2004b).

Type
Technical Note
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)