Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:12:32.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological radiation dose from secondary particles in a Milky Way gamma-ray burst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2013

Dimitra Atri ,
Adrian L. Melott  and
Andrew Karam
Dimitra Atri
Affiliation:
Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA 98145-1561, USA Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India e-mail: dimitra@bmsis.org
Adrian L. Melott
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
Andrew Karam
Affiliation:
Nevada Technical Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 93355, Las Vegas, NV 89193, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are a class of highly energetic explosions emitting radiation in a very short timescale of a few seconds and with a very narrow opening angle. Although, all GRBs observed so far are extragalactic in origin, there is a high probability of a GRB of galactic origin beaming towards the Earth in the past ∼0.5 Gyr. We define the level of catastrophic damage to the biosphere as approximation 100 kJ m−2, based on Thomas et al. (2005a, b). Using results in Melott & Thomas (2011), we estimate the probability of the Earth receiving this fluence from a GRB of any type, as 87% during the last 500 Myr. Such an intense burst of gamma rays would ionize the atmosphere and deplete the ozone (O3) layer. With depleted O3, there will be an increased flux of Solar UVB on the Earth's surface with potentially harmful biological effects. In addition to the atmospheric damage, secondary particles produced by gamma ray-induced showers will reach the surface. Among all secondary particles, muons dominate the ground-level secondary particle flux (99% of the total number of particles) and are potentially of biological significance. Using the Monte Carlo simulation code CORSIKA, we modelled the air showers produced by gamma-ray primaries up to 100 GeV. We found that the number of muons produced by the electromagnetic component of hypothetical galactic GRBs significantly increases the total muon flux. However, since the muon production efficiency is extremely low for photon energies below 100 GeV, and because GRBs radiate strongly for only a very short time, we find that the biological radiation dose from secondary muons is negligible. The main mechanism of biological damage from GRBs is through Solar UVB irradiation from the loss of O3 in the upper atmosphere.

Keywords

radiation dosegamma-ray burstsmuon radiation
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 224 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atri, D. & Melott, A.L. (2011a). Rad. Phys. Chem. 80.6, 701–703.Google Scholar
Atri, D. & Melott, A.L. (2011b). Geophys. Res. Lett. 38(19), L19203.Google Scholar
Atri, D. & Melott, A.L. (2013). Astropart. Phys. in press http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.03.001.Google Scholar
Atri, D., Melott, A.L. & Thomas, B.C. (2010). J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010.05, 008.Google Scholar
Augusto, C.R.A. et al. (2013). Phys. Rev. D 87(10), 103003.Google Scholar
Band, D. et al. (1993). Astrophys. J. 413, 281–292.Google Scholar
Cockell, C.S. (1998). J. Theor. Biol. 193, 717–29.Google Scholar
Dartnell, L.R. (2011). Astrobiology 11(6), 551–582.Google Scholar
Dermer, C.D. & Holmes, J.M. (2005). Astrophys. J. Lett. 621, L28. doi: 10.1086/432663.Google Scholar
Dieter, H. (1998). CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo program to simulate extensive air showers. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Report, FZKA 6019.Google Scholar
Ejzak, L.M. et al. (2007). Astrophys. J. 654(1), 373.Google Scholar
Gaisser, T.K. (1991). Cosmic Rays and Particle Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gao, S., Kashiyama, K. & Meszaros, P. (2013). ApJ. 772 L4. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/772/1/L4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, J.E. & Galante, D. (2012). Int. J. Astrobiol. 11(4), 279–286. doi: 10.1017/S1473550412000304.Google Scholar
Karam, P.A. (2002). Health Phys. 82(4), 491–499.Google Scholar
Melott, A.L. & Thomas, B.C. (2009). Paleobiology 35, 311–320.Google Scholar
Melott, A.L. & Thomas, B.C. (2011). Astrobiology 11(4), 343–361. doi: 10.1089/ast.2010.0603.Google Scholar
Melott, A.L. et al. (2004). Int. J. Astrobiol. 3(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Melott, A.L. et al. (2010). J. Geophys. Res. 115, E8, E08002.Google Scholar
Micke, A., Smith, H.H., Woodley, R.G. & Mashke, A. (1964). P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 52, 219–221.Google Scholar
Nelson, W.R. (1966). Muon Production Calculations for Muon Shielding. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA. (SLAC-TN-66-37).Google Scholar
Overholt, A., Melott, A.L. & Atri, D. (2013). J. Geophys. Res.-Space DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50377.Google Scholar
Scalo, J. & Wheeler, J.C. (2002). Astrophys. J. 566(2), 723.Google Scholar
Serino, M. et al. (2012). GRB 120424A: MAXI/GSC detection of a burst. GRB Coordinates Network, Circular Service, 13261, 1.Google Scholar
Stevenson, G.R. (1983). Dose and Dose Equivalent from Muons, CERN TIS Divisional Report TISRP/Cr99,1983, Center for European Nuclear Research.Google Scholar
Thomas, B.C. et al. (2005a). Astrophys. J. Lett. 622(2), L153.Google Scholar
Thomas, B.C. et al. (2005b). Astrophys. J. 634(1), 509.Google Scholar
UNSCEAR (1996). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. (United Nations Science Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (1996). United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Usoskin, I.G. & Gennady, A.K. (2006). J. Geophys. Res-Atmos. 111, D21, 1984–2012.Google Scholar