Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T18:38:57.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demands of Care and Dilemmas of Freedom: What We Really Ought to Be Worried About

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2010

Tamara Metz
Tamara Metz
Affiliation:
Reed College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So long as the state defines, confers, and uses marital status as a vehicle for protecting and supporting associations of intimate caregivers, also known as families, it must offer the status to same-sex intimate caregiving couples. A commitment to equal treatment before the law demands it. Period.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 120 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cott, Nancy. 2000. Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982. “Feminism, Family, and Community.” Dissent 29: 442–49.Google Scholar
Engster, Daniel. 2007. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M. A. 1995. The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. 2004. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy. 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. 1999. Love's Labor: Essays of Women, Equality and Dependency, Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
Levy, Traci M. 2005. “At the Intersection of Intimacy and Care: Redefining ‘Family’ Through the Lens of a Public Ethic of Care.” Politics and Gender 1 (March): 65–95.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. 2006. The Place of Families. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Metz, Tamara. 2010. Untying the Knot: Marriage, the State, and the Case for their Divorce. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha, and Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1996. “Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law.” Hypatia 11 (1): 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, H. Elizabeth, and Kamp Dush, Claire M.. 2009. Marriage and Families: Perspectives and Complexities. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenfluch, Sarah Jane Executive Producer. 2009. “As We Are: Child Free.” Think Out Loud [radio broadcast]. Portland: Oregon Public Broadcasting, October 14.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. “Toward Equal Regard for Marriages and Other Imperfect Intimate Affiliations.” Hofstra Law Review, 32 (2003): 331–348.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar