Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Social Science with Neuroscience: Potentials and Problems

  • Article
  • Published:
BioSocieties Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New opportunities for systematic collaboration between neuroscience and social science have opened up in recent years, and some of the potentials and the problems that accompany them are explored with reference to Damasio's work. Systematic collaboration and integration might yield benefits for metatheoretical, theoretical and substantive inquiry, but will be impeded by language, conceptual and methodological problems. Strategies to facilitate collaboration are discussed, and it is concluded that methodological problems will be most difficult to resolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baerveldt C., & Voestermans P. (2005). Culture, emotion and the normative structure of reality. Theory and Psychology, 15, 449–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert M., & Altenmueller E. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: A longitudinal DC-EEG study. URL (accessed November 2006): www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC270043/

  • Bennett M.R., & Hacker P.M.S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson C. (2001). The cultural psychology of self: Place, morality and art in human worlds. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley-Macleod W. (2002). Complexity, bounded rationality and heuristic search. URL (accessed December 2006): ssrn.com/abstract=170989

  • Bianchi-Demichelli F., Grafton S., & Ortigue S. (2006). The power of love on the human brain. Social Neuroscience, 1, 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore C. (1990). Understanding images in the brain. In Barlow H. Blakemore C. & Weston-Smith M. (Eds), Images and understanding, 257–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer G. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt I. (1991). Social selves. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt I. (1999). Bodies of thought: Embodiment, identity and modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt I. (2003). Psychology in the field of being: Merleau-Ponty, ontology and social constructionism. Theory and Psychology, 13, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo J., & Berntson G. (Eds) (2005). Social neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig A. (1997). Postmodern pluralism and our selves. Theory and Psychology, 7, 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromby J. (2004). Between constructionism and neuroscience: The societal co-constitution of embodied subjectivity. Theory and Psychology, 14, 797–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromby J. (2005). Theorising embodied subjectivity. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 15, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley N. (2001). The social body: Habit, identity and desire. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A.R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A. (2002) A neurobiology for emotion and feeling. Paper presented at the ‘Emotion, Evolution and Rationality’ conference, 27 April, Kings College London.

  • Damasio A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL: Harvest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A., & Rose D. (2000). Experimental method in psychology. In Breakwell G. Hammond S. & Fife-Schaw C. (Eds), Research methods in psychology, 42–58. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos J. (1996). Shame and guilt in early New England. In Harré R. & Parrott W.G. (Eds), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions, 74–88. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology, 5, 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D., & Potter J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias N. (1978). The history of manners: The civilising process, vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (2004). Emotions and rationality. In Manstead A. Frijda N. & Fischer A. (Eds), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. (1977). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Martin L. Gutman H. & Hutton P. (Eds), Technologies of the self, 16–49. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen K.J. (1991). The saturated self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen K.J. (1997). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham G. (1993). Philosophy of mind: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross P., & Levitt N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall S., & Jacques M. (Eds). (1989). New times: The changing face of politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré R. (1992). The second cognitive revolution. American Behavioural Scientist, 36, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelas P., & Lock A. (Eds). (1981). Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques J., Hollway W., Urwin C., Venn C., & Walkerdine V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller J. (2005). Sex, mind and emotion through the life course: A biopsychosocial perspective. In Hiller J. Wood H. & Bolton W. (Eds), Sex, mind and emotion. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce P. (1995). Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambie J.A., & Marcel, A.J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience. Psychological Review, 109, 219–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont M., & Molnar V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R. (1982). Thoughts on the relationship between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Doux J. (1999). The emotional brain. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan R. (1987). Historical change in prevailing sense of self. In Yardley K. & Honess T. (Eds), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives, 13–26. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire E., Gadian D., Johnsrude I., Good C., Ashburner J., Frackowiak R. et al. (2000). Navigation related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA), 97, 4398–4403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault. In Martin L. Gutman H. & Hutton P. (Eds), Technologies of the self, 9–15. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger N., & Zare R. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science, 283, 642–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriera T., & Palladino P. (2005). Between truth and hope: On Parkinson's disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris B. (1994). Anthropology of the self: The individual in cultural perspective. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale D.J. (1999). Bodies: Reading the body. In I. Parker, & The Bolton Discourse Network (Eds), Critical textworks, 167–177. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J. (1998). Affective neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J. (2004). Emotional consciousness: Animalian sources of affective values and the core self. Paper presented at the Science, Self and Meaning conference (annual conference of the Consciousness and Experiential Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society), Oxford.

  • Parker I. (1996). Against Wittgenstein: Materialist reflections on language in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 6, 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker I., Georgaca E., Harper D., McLaughin T., & Stowell-Smith M. (1995). Deconstructing psychopathology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J., & Edwards D. (1990). Nigel Lawson's tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary career path. Science, 306, 2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson K. (2002). What IQ tests test. Theory and Psychology, 12, 283–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. (1991). Might the self be a substance after all? Theory and Psychology, 1, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls E.T. (1999). The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose H., & Rose S. (2001). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London: Vintage (Jonathan Cape).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N. (2005). Becoming neurochemical selves. URL (accessed December 2006): www.lse.ac.uk/collections/sociology/pdf/Rose-BecomingNeurochemicalSelves.pdf

  • Rose S. (1997). Lifelines: Life beyond the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross A. (1996). Introduction. Social Text, 46/47, 14, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt W.A., Brinkley C.A., & Newman J.P. (1999). Testing Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk-takers or risk-averse? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 538–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilling C. (2003). The body and social theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter J., & Gergen K.J. (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smail D.J. (2005). Power, interest and psychology: Elements of a social materialist understanding of distress. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms M., & Turnbull O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam H. (Ed.) (1998). The body and psychology. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns P., & Knapp M. (1996). Historical perspectives on grief. In Harré R. & Parrott W.G. (Eds), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions, 132–150. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman C. (1994). Psychology, society, subjectivity: An introduction to German Critical Psychology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann S. (1991). Tacit assumptions in the computational study of vision. In Gorea A. Fregnac Y. Kapoula Z. & Findlay J. (Eds), Representations of vision: Trends and tacit assumptions in vision research, 305–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen C. (2005). Damasio's subject: Constructions of self in contemporary neuroscience. Paper presented at the International Society for Theoretical Psychology Conference, Cape Town.

  • Vygotsky L.S. (1962). Thought and language, trans. E. Hanfmann, & G. Vakar . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody E., & Szechtman H. (2000). Hypnotic hallucinations: Towards a biology of epistemology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wykes T., & Brammer M. (2002). Effects on the brain of a psychological treatment: Cognitive remediation therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young I.M. (1990). ‘Throwing like a girl’ and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cromby, J. Integrating Social Science with Neuroscience: Potentials and Problems. BioSocieties 2, 149–169 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005224

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005224

Keywords

Navigation