Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:16:51.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mean force structure and its scaling in rough-wall turbulent boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Faraz Mehdi ,
J. C. Klewicki  and
C. M. White
Faraz Mehdi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
J. C. Klewicki*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
C. M. White
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: joe.klewicki@unh.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The combined roughness/Reynolds number problem is explored. Existing and newly acquired data from zero pressure gradient rough-wall turbulent boundary layers are used to clarify the leading order balances of terms in the mean dynamical equation. For the variety of roughnesses examined, it is revealed that the mean viscous force retains dominant order above (and often well above) the roughness crests. Mean force balance data are shown to be usefully organized relative to the characteristic length scale, which is equal or proportional to the width of the region from the wall to where the leading order mean dynamics become described by a balance between the mean and turbulent inertia. This is equivalently the width of the region from the wall to where the mean viscous force loses leading order. For both smooth-wall and rough-wall flows, the wall-normal extent of this region consistently ends just beyond the zero-crossing of the turbulent inertia term. In smooth-wall flow this characteristic length is a known function of Reynolds number. The present analyses indicate that for rough-wall flows the wall-normal position where the mean dynamics become inertial is an irreducible function of roughness and Reynolds number, as it is an inherent function of the relative scale separations between the inner, roughness, and outer lengths. These findings indicate that, for any given roughness, new dynamical regimes will typically emerge as the Reynolds number increases. For the present range of parameters, there appear to be three identifiable regimes. These correspond to the ratio of the equivalent sand grain roughness to the characteristic length being less than, equal to, or greater than $O(1)$. The relative influences of the inner, outer, and roughness length scales on the characteristic length are explored empirically. A prediction for the decay rate of the mean vorticity is developed via extension of the smooth-wall theory. Existing data are shown to exhibit good agreement with this extension. Overall, the present results appear to expose unifying connections between the structure of smooth- and rough-wall flows. Among other findings, the present analyses show promise toward providing a self-consistent and dynamically meaningful way of identifying the domain where the wall similarity hypothesis, if operative, should hold.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 731 , 25 September 2013 , pp. 682 - 712
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, H., Matsuo, Y. & Kawamura, H. L. 2005 A DNS study of Reynolds-number dependence on pressure fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow. In Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williamsburg, VA USA, pp. 189–194.Google Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D. & Tomkins, C. D. 2000 Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 1–54.Google Scholar
Afzal, N. 1982 Fully developed turbulent flow in a pipe: an intermediate layer. Ing.-Arch. 52, 355–377.Google Scholar
Balint, J. L., Wallace, J. M. & Vukoslavčević, P. 1991 The velocity and vorticity vector fields of a turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Statistical Properties. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 53–86.Google Scholar
Brzek, B., Cal, R. B., Johansson, G. & Castillo, L. 2007 Inner and outer scalings in rough surface zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 19, 065101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzek, B., Cal, R. B., Johansson, G. & Castillo, L. 2008 Transitionally rough zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Exp. Fluids 44 (1), 115–124.Google Scholar
Bucchave, P., George, W. K. & Lumley, J. L. 1979 The measurement of turbulence with the laser-Doppler anemometer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 443–503.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. S., Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2006 Velocity-defect scaling for turbulent boundary layers with a range of relative roughness. Exp. Fluids 40 (2), 188–195.Google Scholar
DeGraaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319–346.Google Scholar
Djenidi, l., Antonia, R. A., Amielh, M. & Anselmet, F. 2008 A turbulent boundary layer over a two-dimensional rough wall. Exp. Fluids 44, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. 1980 The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Tech. Rep. 63, Division of Biostatistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Efros, V. & Krogstad, P.-Å 2011 Development of a turbulent boundary layer after a step from smooth to rough surface. Exp. Fluids 51, 1563–1575.Google Scholar
Fife, P., Klewicki, J. & Wei, T. 2009 Time averaging in turbulence settings may reveal an infinite hierarchy of length scales. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 23 (3), 781–807.Google Scholar
Fife, P., Wei, T., Klewicki, J. C. & McMurtry, P. A. 2005 Stress gradient balance layers and scale hierarchies in wall-bounded turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 532, 165–189.Google Scholar
Flack, K. A., Schultz, M. P. & Connelly, J. S. 2007 Examination of a critical roughness height for outer layer similarity. Phys. Fluids 19, 095104.Google Scholar
Flack, K. A., Schultz, M. P. & Shapiro, T. A. 2005 Experimental support for Townsend’s Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough walls. Phys. Fluids 17, 035102.Google Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamotu, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. & Bandyopadhyay, P. R. 1994 Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (8), 307–365.Google Scholar
George, W. K. & Castillo, L. 1997 Zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer. Appl. Mech. Rev. 50 (12), 689–729.Google Scholar
Hauptman, Z. 2010 Characterization of a low-speed boundary layer wind tunnel. Master’s thesis, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Hong, J., Katz, J. & Schultz, M. P. 2011 Near-wall turbulence statistics and flow structures over three-dimensional roughness in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 1–37.Google Scholar
Hou, Y., Somandepalli, V. S. R. & Mungal, M. G. 2006 A technique to determine the total shear stress and polymer stress profiles in drag reduced boundary layer flows. Exp. Fluids 40, 589–600.Google Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jimenez, J. 2006 Scaling the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to $R{e}_{\tau } = 2003$ . Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N., Nickels, T., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. 2009 Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103–136.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2004 Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173–196.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. 2010 Reynolds number dependence, scaling, and dynamics of turbulent boundary layers. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 132, 094001.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. 2013a Self-similar mean dynamics in turbulent wall-flows. J. Fluid Mech. 718, 596–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewicki, J. 2013b A description of turbulent wall-flow vorticity consistent with mean dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Klewicki, J., Ebner, R. & Wu, X. 2011 Mean dynamics of transitional boundary-layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 682, 617–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewicki, J. C. & Falco, R. E. 1990 On accurately measuring statistics associated with small scales in turbulent boundary layers using hot-wire probes. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 119–142.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C., Fife, P. & Wei, T. 2009 On the logarithmic mean profile. J. Fluid Mech. 638, 73–93.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C., Fife, P., Wei, T. & McMurtry, P. 2007 A physical model of the turbulent boundary layer consonant with mean momentum balance structure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 823–839.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.Google Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å & Antonia, R. A. 1999 Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers. Exp. Fluids 27 (5), 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å, Antonia, R. A. & Browne, L. W. B. 1992 Comparison between rough- and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 599–617.Google Scholar
Lee, J. H., Lee, S-. H., Kim, K. & Sung, H. J. 2009 Structure of the turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 1087–1098.Google Scholar
Ligrani, P. & Moffat, R. 1986 Structure of transitionally rough and fully rough turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 69–98.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., McKeon, B. J., Monkewitz, P. A., Nagib, H., Smits, A. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010 Wall-bounded turbulent flows: recent advances and key issues. Phys. Fluids 22, 065103.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, F., Klewicki, J. C. & White, C. M. 2010 Mean momentum balance analysis of rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Physica D 239, 1329–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, F. & White, C. M. 2011 Integral form of the skin friction coefficient suitable for experimental data. Exp. Fluids 50, 43–51.Google Scholar
Meinhart, C & Adrian, R. J. 1995 On the existence of uniform momentum zones in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 7, 694–696.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M., Adams, P. & Fife, P. 2008 Mean momentum balance in moderately favourable pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 617, 107–140.Google Scholar
Millikan, C. 1938 A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. In Proceedings of 5th International Congress on Applied Mech., Cambridge, MA, pp. 386–392. Wiley.Google Scholar
Monty, J. P., Allen, J. J., Lien, K. & Chong, M. S. 2011 Modification of the large-scale features of high Reynolds number wall turbulence by passive surface obtrusions. Exp. Fluids 51, 1755–1763.Google Scholar
Morrill-Winter, C. & Klewicki, J. 2013 Influences of boundary layer scale separation on the vorticity transport contribution to turbulent inertia. Phys. Fluids 51, 1755–1763.Google Scholar
Nugroho, B., Kulandaivelu, V., Harun, Z., Hutchins, N. & Monty, J. P. 2011 An investigation into the effects of highly directional surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In 17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Auckland, NZ. University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Poggi, D. & Katul, G. G. 2008 The effect of canopy roughness density on the constitutive components of the dispersive stresses. Exp. Fluids. 45, 111–121.Google Scholar
Pokrajac, D., McEwan, I. & Nikora, V. 2008 Spatially averaged turbulent stress and its partitioning. Exp. Fluids. 45, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priyadarshana, P. J. A., Klewicki, J. C., Treat, S. & Foss, J. F. 2007 Statistical structure of turbulent-boundary layer velocity–vorticity products at high and low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 570, 307–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A. & Rajagopalan, S. 1991 Rough-wall boundary layers. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 1–25.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P. & Orlu, R. 2010 Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116–126.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. R. & Shaw, R. H. 1982 Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 22, 79–90.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2007 The rough-wall turbulent boundary layers from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 381–405.Google Scholar
Smith, C. R. & Metzler, S. P. 1983 The characteristics of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 27–54.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. & Sahay, A. 1997 The persistence of viscous effects in the overlap region and the mean velocity in turbulent pipe and channel flows. In Self-Sustaining Mechanisms of Wall Turbulence (ed. Panton, R.), pp. 253–272. Computational Mechanics.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tropea, C., Yarin, A. L. & Foss, J. F. (Eds) 2007 Laser Doppler technique. In Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics, pp. 296–309. Springer.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Y., Lindgren, B. & Johansson, A. 2005 Self-similar profile of probability density functions in zero-pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 37, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volino, R. J., Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2009 Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. M. 2009 Twenty years of experimental and direct numerical simulation access to the velocity gradient tensor: What have we learned about turbulence? Phys. Fluids 20, 021301.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Balint, J. L. & Ong, L. 1992 An experimental study of helicity density in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A 4 (9), 2013–2026.Google Scholar
Wei, T., Fife, P. & Klewicki, J. C. 2007 On scaling the mean momentum balance and its solutions in turbulent Couette–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 573, 371–398.Google Scholar
Wei, T., Fife, P., Klewicki, J. C. & McMurtry, P. 2005 Properties of the mean momentum balance in turbulent boundary layer, pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 522, 303–327.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2008 A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 81–112.Google Scholar
Zagarola, M. V. & Smits, A. J. 1998 FEDSM98-4950: a new mean velocity scaling for turbulent boundary layers. In Proceedings of ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, June 21–25, Washington DC. ASME.Google Scholar