Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:54:46.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low socioeconomic status predicts vitamin D status in a cross-section of Irish children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Helena Scully*
Affiliation:
Mercers Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Eamon Laird
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
Martin Healy
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Vivion Crowley
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
James Bernard Walsh
Affiliation:
Mercers Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Kevin McCarroll
Affiliation:
Mercers Institute for Research on Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Helena Scully, email scullyhe@tcd.ie

Abstract

Vitamin D is essential for bone and muscle health with adequate status in childhood crucial for normal skeletal development. We aimed to investigate vitamin D status in a convenience sample (n = 1226) of Irish children (aged 1–17 years) who had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) tested by request of their GP at a Dublin Hospital between 2014 and 2020. We examined predictors including age, sex, season and socioeconomic status (SES). Vitamin D deficiency (<30 nmol/l) was prevalent affecting 23 % and was more common in disadvantaged areas (34 %) and in those aged >12 v. ≤12 years (24 % v. 16 %, P = 0⋅033). The greatest predictor was SES (disadvantaged v. affluent, OR 2⋅18, CI 1⋅34, 3⋅53, P = 0⋅002), followed by female sex (OR 1⋅57, CI 1⋅15, 2⋅14, P = 0⋅005) and winter season (October to February, OR 1⋅40, CI 1⋅07, 1⋅84, P = 0⋅015). A quarter of our sample of children were deficient, rising to one-third in those in disadvantaged areas. Females and those aged over 12 years had a higher prevalence of deficiency. Public health strategies to improve vitamin D status in Irish children, including systematic food fortification may need to be considered to address this issue.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Vitamin D (cholecalciferol) is a secosteroid produced via the action of Ultraviolet-B (UVB) light on skin. It is essential for the adequate absorption of calcium from the gastrointestinal tract and normal skeletal development(1). Vitamin D deficiency (25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) <30 nmol/l) in children can lead to impaired bone mineralisation causing rickets or osteomalacia(1). Concernedly, a case study of Irish infants in 2006 suggests a rise in rickets incidence(2), as found in the UK, where cases have reached a 50-year peak(Reference Goldacre, Hall and Yeates3). While the overall prevalence of rickets is low, those at increased risk include young children under 5 particularly those of Black and South-east Asian ethnicity(Reference Julies, Lynn and Pall4).

Importantly, peak bone mass in adolescence and early adulthood is influenced by vitamin D status and may account for 60 % of osteoporosis risk in later life(Reference Weaver, Gordon and Janz5). Vitamin D may also have a role developmentally in early life consistent with the Barker fetal origins hypothesis(Reference Ideraabdullah, Belenchia and Rosenfeld6). For example, it may be important in fetal epigenetic programming of respiratory conditions in childhood(Reference Weiss and Litonjua7) and has been associated with language and motor skill development, and risk of autism and ADHD(Reference Janbek, Specht and Heitmann8,Reference García-Serna and Morales9) . Deficiency in childhood has been associated in some studies with extra-skeletal diseases(Reference García-Serna and Morales9) such as hypertension(Reference Abboud, Al Anouti and Papandreou10), diabetes(Reference Wimalawansa11,Reference Zipitis and Akobeng12) , depression(Reference Föcker, Antel and Ring13), dental caries(Reference Hujoel14), atopy and asthma(Reference Huang, Lara-Corrales and Pope15,Reference Jat and Khairwa16) . Additionally, vitamin D might support childhood immune function with evidence suggesting a protective effect against respiratory tract infections. However, randomised control trials are required to further explore these associations(Reference Mailhot and White17).

Due to Irelands’ north latitude (53°N), little or no vitamin D can be synthesised during winter months and adult deficiency is prevalent(Reference Scully, Laird and Healy18,Reference Laird, O'Halloran and Carey19) . However, studies in Irish children and adolescents are limited, with deficiency (<30 nmol/l) ranging between 5 and 22 % and levels <50 nmol/l reported to be between 27 and 89 %(Reference Carroll, Onwuneme and McKenna20Reference Andersen, Mølgaard and Skovgaard23). Factors related to familial socioeconomic status (SES) have been suggested to affect vitamin D including lower diet quality, reduced intake of oily fish and supplement intakes and less access to outdoor amenities(Reference Roberts, Cade and Dawson24Reference Mithal, Wahl and Bonjour26). While some studies in Ireland have looked at the predictors of vitamin D, none have investigated any relationship with SES in children. In the UK, social deprivation and lower household income has been found to be independently associated with childhood vitamin D deficiency(Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27,Reference Basatemur, Horsfall and Marston28) .

Given the limited studies in Ireland, we aimed to assess the association of SES and vitamin D status in children (1–17 years) in the Dublin area and surrounds who had 25(OH)D levels tested at our hospital laboratory by request of their General Practitioner (GP). In addition, we aimed to identify the prevalence of deficiency and its variation by age, sex and season. We also examined the proportion of children who were retested and factors associated with this.

Methods

Data collection

Data were collected at St James's Hospital (SJH), Dublin, Republic of Ireland (53° Northern Latitude). It serves a population of approximately 350 000 and receives referrals primarily from Dublin city and its surrounds. Using the laboratory information system (iSOFT Telepath®) at SJH Biochemistry Department, a search was completed for vitamin D requests from primary care GPs between 2014 and 2020. A convenient sample was identified using the following exclusion criteria: age ≥18 years on initial test, incomplete or missing demographic data, non-community address (e.g. Hospital) or location outside the Republic of Ireland. We also identified any repeat vitamin D tests (i.e. retests) for each participant during the study period.

Socioeconomic status

Participant socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed by mapping postal addresses using the 2016 Pobal HP (Haase-Pratschke) Deprivation Index(Reference Haase and Pratschke29). This is a composite score of demographic profile, social class composition and labour market situation of small areas based on the 2016 Census of the Population. Small areas (100 households mean) are given a Relative Index Score that is then categorised into the following groups: extremely disadvantaged (≤−30), very disadvantaged (−20 to −29⋅99), disadvantaged (−10 to −19⋅99), marginally below average (0 to −9⋅99), marginally above average (0–9⋅99), affluent (10–19⋅99), very affluent (20–29⋅99) and extremely affluent (≥30). In this analysis, categories were combined into four groups: (1) disadvantaged (extremely disadvantaged, very disadvantaged, disadvantaged), (2) below average, (3) above average and (4) affluent (extremely affluent, very affluent, affluent), as previously described(Reference Swan, O'Sullivan and Warters30).

Ethics

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the St James's Hospital/Tallaght University Hospital (SJH/TUH) joint ethics committee (Ref: 5475). This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki 1964 guidelines.

Serum 25(OH)D and biochemical markers

Vitamin D (total 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3) was measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (API 400; AB SCIEX) at the Biochemistry Department of SJH. A validated method (Chromsystems Instruments and Chemicals GmbH; MassChrom 25-OH-Vitamin D3/D2) accredited to ISO 15189:2012 standards was employed for analysis. Assay quality was ensured by participation in the vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) and assay of internal and third-party quality controls and has been accredited by the Irish National Accreditation Board (INAB). Our vitamin D results fall within 3⋅5 % of the target control value, and this was similar for all years during the study. Accuracy was determined using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 972 25(OH)D standard reference material (SRM 972). The respective inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation are 5⋅7 and 4⋅5 %. In this study, we defined deficiency: <30 nmol/l, insufficiency: 30⋅0–49⋅9 nmol/l and sufficiency: ≥50 nmol/l(31). Participants with 25(OH)D level >125 nmol/l were also identified as there may be associated health risks above this concentration(31). Winter was defined as (October–February); and summer (March–September) as used elsewhere(Reference Laird, Shannon and Crowley32).

Statistics

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (Version 26, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The population was dichotomised by age (≤12 or >12 years) as in previous studies(3335). Data were checked for normality by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Geometric mean with standard deviation was reported in tables. Categorical variables were tested using χ 2, with independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables. Statistical significance was accepted when P < 0⋅05. Independent factors associated with vitamin D deficiency were explored in multi-nominal logistic regression models using the following variables: age category, sex, socioeconomic status and season of sampling. In a similar model, we explored for predictors of vitamin D retesting.

Results

Demographics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. Vitamin D results (not including retests) were initially identified for 1294 children aged between 1 and 17 years. After exclusion of participants with no available address (n = 25), and in whom SES could not be mapped (n = 43) the final number was 1226. The majority (69⋅2 %) were female and 89⋅3 % were aged >12 years. A similar proportion was tested in summer (56⋅5 %) and winter (43⋅5 %). The most prevalent SES classification was above average (43⋅6 %), followed by affluent (37⋅5 %), below average (11⋅1 %) and disadvantaged (7⋅8 %). The number tested was lower in 2014/2015 with annual increases thereafter in the period up to 2019. Nearly one-fifth (17⋅6 %, n = 228) of participants had vitamin D retested in the study period.

Table 1. Population demographics

Overall, 23 % were vitamin D deficient, ranging from 20⋅1 % in summer to 25⋅9 % in winter (Table 2). More than half (50⋅6 %) had levels below 50 nmol/l, which was more common in winter compared to summer (55⋅3 % v. 46⋅9 %, P = 0⋅003). Mean 25(OH)D was higher in those aged under v. older 12 years (43⋅3 nmol/l v. 49⋅5 nmol/l, P = 0⋅020). It was also lower in females v. males (42⋅3 nmol/l v. 47⋅6 nmol/l, P = 0⋅008) but the difference was only significant in winter (39⋅4 nmol/l v. 45⋅7 nmol/l, P = 0⋅021). Serum 25(OH)D also varied by year ranging from an average of 39⋅1 nmol/l in 2018 to 50⋅7 nmol/l in 2014 (P < 0⋅001).

Table 2. Serum 25(OH)D status and concentration by age and sex (dichotomised by season)

25(OH)D reported as Geometric mean ± (standard deviation) in nmol/l.

* P-value for winter season (October–February) v. summer season (March–September). P-values are reported for within category differences, using Mann–Whitney U or χ 2 test.

Females had a higher prevalence of deficiency v. males (25 % v. 17 %, P = 0⋅003) but this remained significant only in winter (29 % v. 18 %, P = 0⋅006) (Fig. 1). There was also a lower proportion of females v. males who were vitamin D sufficient (≥50 nmol/l) in both seasons but this was not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of 25(OHD) >125 nmol/l was 0⋅6 % with no difference by season or sex.

Fig. 1. Vitamin D status by sex. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ 2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).

Vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in those aged over v. under 12 years (23 % v. 15 %, P = 0⋅034). In the over 12s, deficiency was also greater in winter v. summer (27 % v. 21 %, P = 0⋅021) (Fig. 2). Those aged over 12 years had more sufficiency in summer v. winter (53 % v. 43 %, P = 0⋅002). We also found more deficiency in those ≤12 years in summer v. winter but this was not statistically significant. The prevalence of serum 25(OH)D >125 nmol/l was 0⋅7 and 0⋅5 % in the under and over 12s. Overall, levels of deficiency were significantly higher (26 % v. 20 %, P = 0⋅015), and sufficiency significantly lower (45 % v. 53 %, P = 0⋅003), in winter v. summer.

Fig. 2. Vitamin D status by age. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ 2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).

Vitamin D status and concentration by socioeconomic category are presented in Table 3. The difference in vitamin D status was greatest between affluent and disadvantaged areas. Children in below or above average areas had intermediate vitamin D levels with little difference between both of these SES categories, though being higher than disadvantaged. There were also significant differences in deficiency by area (P = 0⋅0018) ranging from 34 % in disadvantaged to 20 % in affluent areas. Similarly, the lowest prevalence of levels below 50 nmol/l was identified in affluent compared to disadvantaged areas (46 % v. 61 %, P = 0⋅019) (Fig. 3). When comparing below and above average SES, there was no difference in the prevalence of deficiency (P = 0⋅866) or levels between 30 and 49 nmol/l (P = 0⋅312). There were no significant differences in serum 25(OH)D in females (P = 0⋅051) or males (P = 0⋅127) across SES categories but sample sizes were smaller. In both those over and under 12 years, there was a significant difference in vitamin D status (P < 0⋅05) by SES with higher levels in affluent areas. Summertime vitamin D status was also significantly different across SES categories (P = 0⋅010) and highest in affluent areas.

Fig. 3. Vitamin D status by socioeconomic status.

Table 3. Serum concentration 25(OH)D by socioeconomic status category

25(OH)D reported as Geometric mean ±(standard deviation) in nmol/l. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September). P-values are reported for within category differences, using χ 2 or Kruskal–Wallis test.

* Indicates significance at <0⋅05 level.

Predictors of vitamin D deficiency are shown in Table 4. The greatest predictor was living in a disadvantaged location (OR 2⋅18, CI 1⋅34, 3⋅53, P = 0⋅002), followed by female sex (OR 1⋅57, CI 1⋅15, 2⋅14, P = 0⋅005), and testing in the winter (OR 1⋅40, CI 1⋅07, 1⋅84, P = 0⋅015). Age was not an independent predictor, though the number under 12 years was small (n = 139) and the analysis was likely to be underpowered to detect a significant difference.

Table 4. Predictors of vitamin D deficiency (in multinomial regression)

B, unstandardised beta, OR, odds ratio.

* Indicates significance at <0⋅05 level.

Indicates reference variable. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).

Predictors of vitamin D retesting are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Baseline deficiency was the greatest predictor (OR 1⋅77, CI 1⋅22, 2⋅56, P = 0⋅003), followed by insufficiency (OR 1⋅76, CI 1⋅24, 2⋅49, P = 0⋅002) and female sex (OR 1⋅45, CI 1⋅03, 2⋅03, P = 0⋅032). There was a trend for reduced testing in those living in disadvantaged (OR 0⋅55, CI 0⋅29, 1⋅05, P = 0⋅068) and above average locations (OR 0⋅72, CI 0⋅52, 1⋅00, P = 0⋅052).

Discussion

This is the largest investigation of vitamin D status in a convenience sample of Irish children and adolescents and the only one to explore the association with SES. We identified that 23 % overall were vitamin D deficient (<30 nmol/l), rising to 34 % in children living in disadvantaged areas. In total, half of the cohort had concentrations less than 50 nmol/l, indicating that inadequate vitamin D status is highly prevalent. The greatest predictor for deficiency was living in disadvantaged locations, followed by female sex, and testing in the winter (October–February). Those over 12 also had lower vitamin D status than those under 12 years. We also showed that about one in five children were retested which is similar to that found in Irish adults(Reference Scully, Laird and Healy36), with predictors of retesting including initial deficiency/insufficiency and female sex.

Vitamin D status by socioeconomic status

Children living in disadvantaged areas were more than twice as likely to be vitamin D deficient compared to affluent children. This is the first study in Ireland examining the effect of SES on vitamin D status in children. The only other Irish study investigating vitamin D status and SES was in older adults as part of the TILDA study, which found that those with below average asset wealth had 1⋅5 times increased prevalence of vitamin D deficiency(Reference Laird, O'Halloran and Carey19). In the UK, low socioeconomic status has also been associated with greater deficiency(Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27,Reference Basatemur, Horsfall and Marston28) and similar results have been identified in the Netherlands(Reference Voortman, van den Hooven and Heijboer37), Greece(Reference Nicolaidou, Kakourou and Papadopoulou38) and Canada(Reference Munasinghe, Yuan and Willows39).

Lower SES may impact on vitamin D status as it has been associated with factors (e.g. reduced physical activity outdoors) that may lower UVB exposure(Reference Romild, Fredman and Wolf-Watz40), reduced dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake and greater obesity prevalence(Reference Roberts, Cade and Dawson24Reference Mithal, Wahl and Bonjour26). Supplements are a key contributor of vitamin D intake in Irish children and adolescents(Reference Black, Walton and Flynn41,Reference Hennessy, Browne and Kiely42) . However, low supplement use has previously been found in children in low income or food insecure households(Reference Jun, Cowan and Tooze25) and has also been correlated with parental education(Reference Räsänen, Kronberg-Kippilä and Ahonen43). Total vitamin D intake has been identified as being lower in children in lower income families in the UK and Spain(Reference Cribb, Jones and Rogers44,Reference Navia, Ortega and Requejo45) . This may be due to an increased prevalence of unhealthy eating in low SES children with lower consumption of vitamin D-rich foods including oily fish, meat and fortified food(Reference Roberts, Cade and Dawson24,Reference Fernández-Alvira, Bammann and Pala46,Reference Al-Agha, Alsharief and Ahmed47) . Furthermore, lower serum 25(OH)D has been found in Canadian children (n = 1753) from lower income families(Reference Mark, Gray-Donald and Delvin48). Studies of Irish adults have also found an association with disadvantaged backgrounds and a lower likelihood of meeting dietary vitamin D intake recommendations(Reference McCartney, Younger and Walsh49) with lower consumption of foods that are typical sources of vitamin D including fish, meat and breakfast cereals. In the US, vitamin D intake in children and adults was also correlated with income, with greater levels shown in the highest income group(Reference Moore, Radcliffe and Liu50,Reference Wallace, Reider and Fulgoni51) .

Another factor that may help explain vitamin D status by SES group is differences in rates of obesity. For example, obesity or overweight status in Irish children was more prevalent in those attending disadvantaged schools(Reference Mitchell, Bel-Serrat, Stanley, Hegarty, McCann, Mehegan, Murrin, Heinen and Kelleher52). Obesity is associated with lower vitamin D in children, possibly due to its sequestration in adipose tissue(Reference Plesner, Dahl and Fonvig53). We also identified seasonal differences in vitamin D status across SES categories, with those in affluent areas having higher serum levels in summer. This could be related to increased sun holiday travel, which is a reported determinant of vitamin D status in Irish adults(Reference McCarroll, Beirne and Casey54). Additionally, higher socioeconomic status is associated with reduced screen-time, increased access to outdoor activities and engagement in organised sports in adolescents, resulting in increased sun exposure(Reference Mithal, Wahl and Bonjour26,Reference Toftegaard-Støckel, Nielsen and Ibsen55,Reference Carroll-Scott, Gilstad-Hayden and Rosenthal56) . In deprived areas, there may be reduced access to parks/playgrounds/gyms, which could also lower UVB exposure(Reference Carroll-Scott, Gilstad-Hayden and Rosenthal56,Reference Jones, Hillsdon and Coombes57) .

Vitamin D status by age

We identified that children aged >12 years had a greater prevalence of deficiency consistent with other studies in Europe, the US and Asia(Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27,Reference Cashman, Dowling and Škrabáková58Reference Karalius, Zinn and Wu60) . The only other Irish study comparing vitamin D status by age category was small (n = 252) and found a lower mean 25(OH)D in 12–17 years old v. those aged 1–4 years(Reference Carroll, Onwuneme and McKenna20). A larger Irish study of toddlers (aged 2 years) found a prevalence of deficiency (4⋅6 %) about five times lower than in the over 12s in our study(Reference Ní Chaoimh, McCarthy and Hourihane22). Similarly, in the most recent UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey, deficiency was greater in those aged 11–18 (19 %) v. 4–10 years (2 %)(61). In Europe, higher rates of deficiency (<30 nmol/l) were found in teenagers v. younger children(Reference Cashman, Dowling and Škrabáková58). Likewise, in a large US study (n = 16 180), over 12s had the greatest prevalence of serum 25(OH)D (<50 nmol/l)(Reference Herrick, Storandt and Afful62). Lower vitamin D status in older children may reflect reduced intake of vitamin D fortified foods, more sedentary behaviour or screen-time and higher rates of obesity(33,35,Reference Karalius, Zinn and Wu60) . Indeed, a dietary survey (n = 594) of Irish children and teens found a lower rate of supplement use and fortified foods in adolescents (13–17 years) v. younger children (9–12 years)(Reference Black, Walton and Flynn41). Increased vitamin D requirements in adolescence(Reference Smith and Hart63) due to an intensive period of new bone growth has also been proposed as a factor(31). Finally, greater diagnosis of deficiency in older children might be in part due to more frequent presentation to GP's for chronic pain/medical symptoms or higher thresholds for vitamin D tests in younger children due to the challenges of phlebotomy(Reference Basatemur, Horsfall and Marston28).

Vitamin D status by season and sex

As expected, there was a seasonal variation in 25(OH)D, consistent with most studies(Reference Carroll, Onwuneme and McKenna20,35,Reference Munasinghe, Yuan and Willows39,Reference Romild, Fredman and Wolf-Watz40) , with more deficiency in winter v. summer. Furthermore, 55⋅5 % of children had a 25(OH)D below 50 nmol/l in winter. This figure is identical (55⋅3 %) to the recent finding in children (n = 47, age 7–11) living in Northern Ireland between November and March(Reference Glatt, McSorley and Pourshahidi21). While the prevalence of deficiency/insufficiency varied by season in the under 12s, the difference was not significant, but is likely explained by the small sample size and lack of statistical power. A notable finding was the lower vitamin D status in females who were more likely to be deficient, a finding similar to other studies in Europe and elsewhere. For example, deficiency has been reported to be more common in Northern Irish female adolescents(Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell64), female children in Britain(1,Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27) , Greece(Reference Manios, Moschonis and Hulshof65) and the US(Reference Karalius, Zinn and Wu60). Despite this, another study in Germany identified more deficiency in males(Reference Kunz, Hower and Knoll66).

We did find though that the difference in 25(OH)D status by sex was only significant in winter, albeit with a trend for better vitamin D status in males in summer. Dietary intake may be a contributory factor as female children have been found to have a lower vitamin D intake and consume less vitamin D fortified foods(Reference Lehtonen-Veromaa, Möttönen and Leino6769). Body composition during puberty may play a role, with females acquiring greater fat mass during maturation(Reference Taylor, Grant and Williams70). Additionally, it is possible that adolescent girls may engage more in veganism, as found in female adults(Reference Cramer, Kessler and Sundberg71), which could lower vitamin D intake due to avoidance of meat and milks, that are significant sources of dietary vitamin D(35). Females within ethnic minorities may also have reduced exposure due to religious dress(Reference Mithal, Wahl and Bonjour26). On the other hand, male adolescents are reported to engage in more outdoor activity which affords more opportunity for sun exposure(Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27,Reference Hill, Cotter and Mitchell64) . They are also less likely to use sunscreen or take measures to avoid sunburn(Reference Vierucci, Del Pistoia and Fanos72) and may have more cutaneous exposure to summer UVB due to less clothing cover(Reference Tolppanen, Fraser and Fraser27,Reference McAvoy, Rodriguez and Költő73) . Finally, it has been suggested that higher overall GP consultation rates for girls than boys might account in part for a greater diagnosis of deficiency(Reference Basatemur, Horsfall and Marston28,Reference Wang, Hunt and Nazareth74) .

Guidelines on vitamin D intakes and implications

The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) advise a vitamin D intake of 5 μg/d for children aged 1–5 years(2) though have only a blanket recommendation of 10 μg/d for those aged 5–65 years(75). Guidelines are similar in the UK, with an intake (RNI) of 10 μg/d for those aged >4 years and a ‘Safe intake’ of 10 μg/d between 1 and 4 years(1). However, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommend a higher dietary allowance of 15 μg/d between 1 and 18 years(75,Reference Grossman, Hadjipanayis and Stiris76) . Despite more conservative guidelines in Ireland, 70–84 % of 1–4-year olds(34) and 94 % of 5–18-year olds have inadequate vitamin D intakes(33,35) .

Indeed, it has been suggested that vitamin D intakes for children may need to be substantially higher. For example, an estimated total vitamin D intake (dietary and supplemental) of 33⋅8 μg/d may be required for 97⋅5 % of children living at 40–63°N to be vitamin D sufficient (>50 nmol/l) in the winter(Reference Cashman, Kiely and Andersen77). However, guidelines alone may not improve vitamin D status. In Canada, after dietary guidelines for vitamin D intake increased from 5 to 15 μg daily for those aged 1–70 years, an actual increase in vitamin D insufficiency (<50 nmol/l) was identified in those aged 6–18 years(Reference Munasinghe, Willows and Yuan78). Targeted systematic vitamin D fortification of food is another option, as occurred in Finland in 2003. However, while it led to 91 % of over 30s in the population achieving 25(OH)D >50 nmol/l(Reference Jääskeläinen, Itkonen and Lundqvist79), it produced little improvement in vitamin D intake or serum levels in adolescent females(Reference Lehtonen-Veromaa, Möttönen and Leino67) who had lower fortified food consumption(Reference Smith, Lanham-New and Hart80). The significant prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in our cohort of children suggests that vitamin D intakes are inadequate for a sizeable proportion of those aged 1–17 years, particularly in disadvantaged areas. Guidelines on vitamin D intakes that are specifically tailored to include all Irish children should be developed. However, as studies show these measures alone tend to be inadequate, other strategies including targeted vitamin D fortification of foods that are consumed by children needs to be considered.

Strengths

This is the largest study of vitamin D status in Irish children (1–17 years), and the first to investigate the association with socioeconomic status. We used a specific measure of SES, that is localised to a small area of 100 households, whereas most other studies used proxy measures such as parental education or household income. We used the gold standard of vitamin D measurement, LC-MS and adhere to strict quality monitoring (participation in DEQAS). We also utilised a dataset collected over a 7-year period that included and also explored for predictors of retesting.

Limitations

The present study is based on a convenient sample of GP vitamin D requests which limits the generalisability of the findings to a wider population. In particular, there may be selection bias of study participants who may have conditions predisposing to vitamin D deficiency that underlies the reason for their testing. We were not able to account for factors that influence serum 25(OH)D including biophysical (ethnicity, body mass index, medical conditions) or lifestyle (dietary/supplement intake, sun exposure or sunscreen use) due to the nature of the collected data. Finally, as the study is cross-sectional, we cannot infer any causality with regard to the factors we examined.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified that in a large convenience sample of children attending their GP in Ireland, those in the most disadvantaged area had the highest level of deficiency, affecting 34 %. Furthermore, about one quarter of all children were found to be deficient. Childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for bone and muscle development, and deficiency may have long-term effects on both skeletal and other health outcomes. Targeted and tailored guidelines on vitamin D intake for all Irish children as well as public health promotion of its importance should be a priority. Development of a systematic policy of a vitamin D fortification of foods regularly consumed by children could be a realistic approach to help mitigate this issue.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2022.57.

Acknowledgements

Conceptualisation, E. L., J. B. W. and K. M.; Data curation, M. H. and V. C.; Formal analysis, H. S., E. L., K. M., M. H. and V. C.; Funding acquisition, E. L., J. B. W. and K. M.; Investigation, H. S.; Methodology, H. S.; Project administration, H. S.; Supervision, K. M., E. L.; Writing – original draft, H. S.; Writing – review and editing, H. S., E. L., M. H., J. B. W., V. C. and K. M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research is partially funded by Mercers’ Institute and Glanbia PLC. Glanbia has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

St James's Hospital/Tallaght University Hospital (SJH/TUH) joint ethics committee granted ethical approval for this study (Ref: 5475) which was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki 1964.

References

Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2016) SACN Vitamin D and Health Report. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-committee-on-nutrition (accessed 25 March 2020).Google Scholar
Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) (2020) Scientific Recommendations for Food-Based Dietary Guidelines for 1 to 5 Year-Olds in Ireland (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Goldacre, M, Hall, N & Yeates, DG (2014) Hospitalisation for children with rickets in England: a historical perspective. Lancet 383, 597598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julies, P, Lynn, RM, Pall, K, et al. (2020) Nutritional rickets under 16 years: UK surveillance results. Arch Dis Child 105, 587592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, CM, Gordon, CM, Janz, KF, et al. (2016) The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations. Osteoporos Int 27, 12811386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ideraabdullah, FY, Belenchia, AM, Rosenfeld, CS, et al. (2019) Maternal vitamin D deficiency and developmental origins of health and disease (DOHad). J Endocrinol 241, R65R80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, ST & Litonjua, AA (2011) The in utero effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183, 12861287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janbek, J, Specht, IO & Heitmann, BL (2019) Associations between vitamin D status in pregnancy and offspring neurodevelopment: a systematic literature review. Nutr Rev 77, 330349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Serna, AM & Morales, E (2020) Neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal vitamin D in humans: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 25, 24682481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abboud, M, Al Anouti, F, Papandreou, D, et al. (2021) Vitamin D status and blood pressure in children and adolescents: a systematic review of observational studies. Syst Rev 10, 60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimalawansa, SJ (2018) Associations of vitamin D with insulin resistance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 175, 177189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zipitis, CS & Akobeng, AK (2008) Vitamin D supplementation in early childhood and risk of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 93, 512517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Föcker, M, Antel, J, Ring, S, et al. (2017) Vitamin D and mental health in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26, 10431066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hujoel, PP (2013) Vitamin D and dental caries in controlled clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev 71, 8897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, CM, Lara-Corrales, I & Pope, E (2018) Effects of vitamin D levels and supplementation on atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Dermatol 35, 754760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jat, KR & Khairwa, A (2017) Vitamin D and asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lung India 34, 355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mailhot, G & White, JH (2020) Vitamin D and immunity in infants and children. Nutrients 12, 1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scully, H, Laird, E, Healy, M, et al. (2020) Geomapping vitamin D status in a large city and surrounding population—exploring the impact of location and demographics. Nutrients 12, 2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, E, O'Halloran, AM, Carey, D, et al. (2018) The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and the determinants of 25(OH)D concentration in older Irish adults: data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). J Gerontol A-Biol 73, 519525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A, Onwuneme, C, McKenna, MJ, et al. (2014) Vitamin D status in Irish children and adolescents: value of fortification and supplementation. Clin Pediatr 53, 13451351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glatt, DU, McSorley, E, Pourshahidi, LK, et al. (2022) Vitamin D status and health outcomes in school children in northern Ireland: year one results from the D-VinCHI study. Nutrients 14, 804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ní Chaoimh, C, McCarthy, EK, Hourihane, JOB, et al. (2018) Low vitamin D deficiency in Irish toddlers despite northerly latitude and a high prevalence of inadequate intakes. Eur J Nutr 57, 783794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R, Mølgaard, C, Skovgaard, LT, et al. (2005) Teenage girls and elderly women living in Northern Europe have low winter vitamin D status. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 533541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, K, Cade, J, Dawson, J, et al. (2018) Empirically derived dietary patterns in UK adults are associated with sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, and diet quality. Nutrients 10, 177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, S, Cowan, AE, Tooze, JA, et al. (2018) Dietary supplement use among U.S. children by family income, food security level, and nutrition assistance program participation status in 2011–2014. Nutrients 10, 1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithal, A, Wahl, DA, Bonjour, J-P, et al. (2009) Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D. Osteoporos Int 20, 18071820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolppanen, A-M, Fraser, A, Fraser, WD, et al. (2012) Risk factors for variation in 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2 concentrations and vitamin D deficiency in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, 12021210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basatemur, E, Horsfall, L, Marston, L, et al. (2017) Trends in the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency. Pediatrics 139, e20162748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haase, T & Pratschke, J (2017) The 2016 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas: Introduction and Reference Tables. Available at http://trutzhaase.eu/wp/wp-content/uploads/The-2016-Pobal-HP-Deprivation-Index-Introduction-07.pdf.Google Scholar
Swan, L, O'Sullivan, M, Warters, A, et al. (2019) 236 socioeconomic and social factors among community-dwelling dependent older people with cognitive impairment in Ireland. Age Ageing 48, iii1iii16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Laird, E, Shannon, T, Crowley, V, et al. (2017) The benefits of utilising geo-mapping for visualising the vitamin D status of Dublin city and the surrounding urban districts. Ir J Med Sci 186, 807813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (IUNA) (2019) The National Children's Food Survey II – Summary Report – September 2019 (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (IUNA) (2012) The National Pre-School Nutrition Survey – Summary Report – June 2012 (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (IUNA) (2021) National Teens’ Food Survey II – Summary Report – June 2021 (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Scully, H, Laird, E, Healy, M, et al. (2021) Vitamin D retesting by general practitioners: a factor and cost analysis. Clin Chem Lab 59, 17901799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voortman, T, van den Hooven, EH, Heijboer, AC, et al. (2015) Vitamin D deficiency in school-age children is associated with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. J Nutr 145, 791798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaidou, P, Kakourou, T, Papadopoulou, A, et al. (2006) Low vitamin D status in preschool children in Greece. Nutr Res 26, 620625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munasinghe, LL, Yuan, Y, Willows, ND, et al. (2017) Vitamin D deficiency and sufficiency among Canadian children residing at high latitude following the revision of the RDA of vitamin D intake in 2010. Br J Nutr 117, 457465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romild, U, Fredman, P & Wolf-Watz, D (2011) Socio-economic Determinants, Demand and Constraints to Outdoor Recreation Participation in Sweden. Ostersund, Sweden: Friluftsliv i förändring.Google Scholar
Black, LJ, Walton, J, Flynn, A, et al. (2014) Adequacy of vitamin D intakes in children and teenagers from the base diet, fortified foods and supplements. Public Health Nutr 17, 721731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennessy, Á, Browne, F, Kiely, M, et al. (2017) The role of fortified foods and nutritional supplements in increasing vitamin D intake in Irish preschool children. Eur J Nutr 56, 12191231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Räsänen, M, Kronberg-Kippilä, C, Ahonen, S, et al. (2006) Intake of vitamin D by Finnish children aged 3 months to 3 years in relation to sociodemographic factors. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 13171322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cribb, VL, Jones, LR, Rogers, IS, et al. (2011) Is maternal education level associated with diet in 10-year-old children? Public Health Nutr 14, 20372048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navia, B, Ortega, RM, Requejo, AM, et al. (2003) Influence of maternal education on food consumption and energy and nutrient intake in a group of pre-school children from Madrid. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 73, 439445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Alvira, JM, Bammann, K, Pala, V, et al. (2014) Country-specific dietary patterns and associations with socioeconomic status in European children: the IDEFICS study. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 811821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Agha, A, Alsharief, A, Ahmed, M, et al. (2016) The effect of socioeconomic status on vitamin D level in children's and adolescents living at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Evid Based Med Pract 2, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, S, Gray-Donald, K, Delvin, EE, et al. (2008) Low vitamin D status in a representative sample of youth from Québec, Canada. Clin Chem 54, 12831289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, DMA, Younger, KM, Walsh, J, et al. (2013) Socio-economic differences in food group and nutrient intakes among young women in Ireland. Br J Nutr 110, 20842097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, CE, Radcliffe, JD & Liu, Y (2014) Vitamin D intakes of children differ by race/ethnicity, sex, age, and income in the United States, 2007 to 2010. Nutr Res 34, 499506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, TC, Reider, C & Fulgoni, VL (2013) Calcium and vitamin D disparities are related to gender, age, race, household income level, and weight classification but not vegetarian status in the United States: analysis of the NHANES 2001–2008 data set. J Am Coll Nutr 32, 321330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, L, Bel-Serrat, S, Stanley, I, Hegarty, T, McCann, L, Mehegan, J, Murrin, C, Heinen, M, Kelleher, C (2020) The Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) in the Republic of Ireland – Findings from 2018 and 2019. Health Service Executive (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Plesner, JL, Dahl, M, Fonvig, CE, et al. (2018) Obesity is associated with vitamin D deficiency in Danish children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 31, 5361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarroll, K, Beirne, A, Casey, M, et al. (2015) Determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older Irish adults. Age Ageing 44, 847853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toftegaard-Støckel, J, Nielsen, G, Ibsen, B, et al. (2011) Parental, socio and cultural factors associated with adolescents’ sports participation in four Danish municipalities. Scand J Med Sci Sports 21, 606611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll-Scott, A, Gilstad-Hayden, K, Rosenthal, L, et al. (2013) Disentangling neighborhood contextual associations with child body mass index, diet, and physical activity: the role of built, socioeconomic, and social environments. Soc Sci Med 95, 106114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A, Hillsdon, M & Coombes, E (2009) Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prev Med 49, 500505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cashman, KD, Dowling, KG, Škrabáková, Z, et al. (2016) Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Am J Clin Nutr 103, 10331044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, C, Mao, M, Ping, L, et al. (2020) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among 460,537 children in 825 hospitals from 18 provinces in mainland China. Medicine 99, 44.Google ScholarPubMed
Karalius, VP, Zinn, D, Wu, J, et al. (2014) Prevalence of risk of deficiency and inadequacy of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in US children: NHANES 2003–2006. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 27, 461466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Health England and the Food Standards Agency (2020) National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme Years 9 to 11 (2016/2017 to 2018/2019) (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Herrick, KA, Storandt, RJ, Afful, J, et al. (2019) Vitamin D status in the United States, 2011–2014. Am J Clin Nutr 110, 150157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T & Hart, K (2017) Vitamin D During Childhood and Adolescence: Evidence-Based Dietary Requirements for Adequacy and Implications for Bone Health. Nutr Bull 42, 5560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, TR, Cotter, AA, Mitchell, S, et al. (2008) Vitamin D status and its determinants in adolescents from the northern Ireland young hearts 2000 cohort. Br J Nutr 99, 10611067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manios, Y, Moschonis, G, Hulshof, T, et al. (2017) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among schoolchildren in Greece: the role of sex, degree of urbanisation and seasonality. Br J Nutr 118, 550558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunz, C, Hower, J, Knoll, A, et al. (2019) No improvement in vitamin D status in German infants and adolescents between 2009 and 2014 despite public recommendations to increase vitamin D intake in 2012. Eur J Nutr 58, 17111722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehtonen-Veromaa, M, Möttönen, T, Leino, A, et al. (2008) Prospective study on food fortification with vitamin D among adolescent females in Finland: minor effects. Br J Nutr 100, 418423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (IUNA) (2019) National Children's Food Survey II – Main Report. Available at https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/46a7ad27/files/uploaded/NCFS%20II%20Main%20Survey%20Report.pdf (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance (IUNA) (2022) National Teens’ Food Survey II – Main Report. Available at https://irp.cdn-website.com/46a7ad27/files/uploaded/NTFS%20II%20Main%20Survey%20Report.pdf.pdf (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Taylor, RW, Grant, AM, Williams, SM, et al. (2010) Sex differences in regional body fat distribution from pre-to postpuberty. Obesity 18, 14101416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, H, Kessler, CS, Sundberg, T, et al. (2017) Characteristics of Americans choosing vegetarian and vegan diets for health reasons. J Nutr Educ Behav 49, 561567.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vierucci, F, Del Pistoia, M, Fanos, M, et al. (2013) Vitamin D status and predictors of hypovitaminosis D in Italian children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pediatr 172, 16071617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAvoy, H, Rodriguez, L, Költő, A, et al. (2020) Children's Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation – A Risk Profile for Future Skin Cancers in Ireland. Ireland Institute of Public Health in Ireland. Available at https://publichealth.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/20200616-Childrens-exposure-to-UV-report-final.pdf (accessed 7 June 2022).Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Hunt, K, Nazareth, I, et al. (2013) Do men consult less than women? An analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data. BMJ Open 3, e003320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) (2019) Healthy Eating, Food Safety and Food Legislation – A Guide Supporting the Healthy Ireland Food Pyramid. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Grossman, Z, Hadjipanayis, A, Stiris, T, et al. (2017) Vitamin D in European children—statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP). Eur J Pediatr 176, 829831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, KD, Kiely, ME, Andersen, R, et al. (2021) Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with vitamin D-fortified foods to estimate dietary reference values for vitamin D. Eur J Nutr 60, 939959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munasinghe, LL, Willows, ND, Yuan, Y, et al. (2017) Vitamin D sufficiency of Canadian children did not improve following the 2010 revision of the dietary guidelines that recommend higher intake of vitamin D: an analysis of the Canadian health measures survey. Nutrients 9, 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, T, Itkonen, ST, Lundqvist, A, et al. (2017) The positive impact of general vitamin D food fortification policy on vitamin D status in a representative adult Finnish population: evidence from an 11-y follow-up based on standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D data. Am J Clin Nutr 105, 15121520.Google Scholar
Smith, TJ, Lanham-New, SA & Hart, KH (2017) Vitamin D in adolescents: are current recommendations enough? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 173, 265272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Population demographics

Figure 1

Table 2. Serum 25(OH)D status and concentration by age and sex (dichotomised by season)

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Vitamin D status by sex. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Vitamin D status by age. *Indicates significance (P < 0⋅05) analysed by χ2. Winter (October–February); Summer (March–September).

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Vitamin D status by socioeconomic status.

Figure 5

Table 3. Serum concentration 25(OH)D by socioeconomic status category

Figure 6

Table 4. Predictors of vitamin D deficiency (in multinomial regression)

Supplementary material: File

Scully et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Scully et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37 KB