Abstract
The Le Quesne test of character compatibility uses pairwise comparisons of characters to detect homoplasy in phylogenetic character data. If a pair of characters fails this test we can conclude that a minimum of a single extra step is required by the pair of characters. The rationale of the Le Quesne test is extended to comparisons of triplets of characters. The triplet homoplasy test can reveal that that there is a minimum of four extra steps across a triplet of characters and thus that there are at least two extra steps associated with one of the characters. The triplet homoplasy test can thus detect higher orders of homoplasy than can be detected by the pairwise Le Quesne test. The possibility of quartet and other higher-order homoplasy tests is discussed. The utility of higher-order homoplasy tests is discussed. It is suggested higher-order homoplasy tests have potential uses analogous to the uses of the Le Quesne test, particularly with respect to data exploration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alroy, J. (1994). Four permutation tests for the presence of phylogenetic structure. Syst. Biol. 43: 430–437.
Duhem, P. (1914). La Theorie Physique: Son Objet, Sa Structure. Paris, Marcel Riviere & Cie.
Estabrook, G.F., C.S. Johnson Jr., and F.R. McMorris (1975). An idealized concept of the true cladistic character. Math. Biosci. 23: 263–272.
Estabrook, G.F., C.S. Johnson Jr., and F.R. McMorris (1976a). A mathematical foundation for the analysis of character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 23: 181–187.
Estabrook, G.F., C.S. Johnson Jr., and F.R. McMorris (1976b). An algebraic analysis of cladistic characters. Discrete Mathematics 16: 141–147.
Estabrook, G.F., and L. Landrum (1975). A simple test for the simultaneous divergence of two amino acid positions. Taxon 24: 609–613.
Estabrook, G.F., J.G. Strauch, and K.L. Fiala (1977). An application of compatibility analysis to the Blackith's data on orthopteroid insects. Syst. Zool. 26: 269–276.
Farris, J.S. (1969). A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18: 374–385.
Foulds, L.R., M.D. Hendy, and D. Penny (1979). A general approach to proving the minimality of phylogenetic trees illustrated by an example with a set of 23 vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 13: 151–166.
Gauld, I., and G. Underwood (1986). Some applications of the Le Quesne compatibility test. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 29: 191–222.
Goloboff, P.A. (1993). Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 83–91.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, p. 91–196. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Le Quesne, W. J. (1969). A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 18: 201–205.
Le Quesne, W. J. (1989). The normal deviate test of phylogenetic value of a data matrix. Syst. Zool. 38: 51–54.
Lento, G.M., R.E. Hickson, G.K. Chambers, and D. Penny (1995). Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 28–52.
Meacham, C. A. (1994). Phylogenetic relationships at the basal radiation of Angiosperms: further study by probability of character compatibility. Syst. Bot. 19: 506–522.
Meacham, C.A., and G.F. Estabrook (1985). Compatibility methods in systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 431–446.
Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. In: K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday, eds., Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, pp. 21–47. London, Academic Press.
Page, R.D.M. (1989). Comments on component-compatibility in historical biogeography. Cladistics 5: 167–182.
Rodrigo, A. C. (1992). Two optimality criteria for selecting subsets of most parsimonious trees. Syst. Biol. 41: 33–40.
Sharkey, M. J. (1989). A hypothesis-independent method of character weighting for cladistic analysis. Cladistics 5: 63–86.
Sharkey, M. J. (1994). Discriminate compatibility measures and the reduction routine. Syst. Biol. 43: 526–542.
Sneath, P.H.A., M.J. Sackin, and R.P. Ambler (1975). Detecting evolutionary incompatibilities from protein sequences. Syst. Zool. 24: 311–332.
Wilkinson, M. (1991). Homoplasy and parsimony analysis. Syst. Zool. 40: 107–109.
Wilkinson, M. (1992). Consensus, compatibility and missing data in phylogenetic inference. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Bristol, England, Univ. Bristol.
Wilkinson, M. (1994a). Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: Reduced Adams and cladistic consensus trees and profiles. Syst. Biol. 43: 343–368.
Wilkinson, M. (1994b). Three-taxon statements: when is a parsimony analysis also a clique analysis? Cladistics 10: 221–223
Wilkinson, M. (1994c). Weights and ranks in numerical phylogenetics. Cladistics 10: 321–329.
Wilkinson, M. (1997a). On phylogenetic relationships within Dendrotriton (Amphibia. Caudata. Plethodontidae): is there sufficient evidence? Herpetol. Journal 7: 35–65.
Wilkinson, M. (1997b). Characters, congruence and quality: a study of neuroanatomical and traditional data in caecilian phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 72: 423–470.
Wilkinson, M. (1997c). Limitations on the use of compatibility methods for polarizing and ordering characters. Syst. Biol. 46: 230–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkinson, M. Higher-Order Homoplasy Tests. Acta Biotheor 46, 109–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001121718577
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001121718577