Abstract
Based on qualitative data gathered in one Finnishuniversity, the article examines disciplinary culturesof four study fields: computer science, libraryscience and informatics, public administration, andsociology and social psychology. It is suggested thatthe core of each discipline can be conceptualized asa moral order that defines the basic beliefs, valuesand norms of the local culture. Following this frameof reference, the analysis of students' accountsdemonstrates essential differences regarding how thevirtues and vices of studying are understood and whatkinds of social identities are constructed indifferent fields. The implications of the results forthe quality assessment and the development ofuniversity teaching are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aittola, T. (1992). Uuden opiskelijatyypin synty (The birth of new student type) Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research 91.
Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. London: Sage Publications.
Bauer, H.H. (1990). 'Barriers against interdisciplinarity: Implications for studies of science, technology, and society (STS)', Science, Technology, & Human Values 15(1), 105–119.
Becher, T. (1994). 'The significance of disciplinary differences', Studies in Higher Education 19(2), 333–346.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Becher, T. (1987). 'The disciplinary shaping of the profession', in Clark, B.R. (ed.), The Academic Profession. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Bergenhenegouwen, G. (1987). 'Hidden curriculum in the university', Higher Education 16(5), 535–543.
Biglan, A. (1973a). 'The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas', Journal of Applied Psychology 57(2), 195–203.
Biglan, A. (1973b). 'Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments', Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3), 204–213.
Boys, C.J., Brennan, J., Henkel, M., Kirkland, J., Kogan, M. and Youll, P. (1988). Higher Education and the Preparation for Work. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Guildford: IAU Press & Pergamon.
Clark, B.R. (1987). The Academic Life. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Clark, B.R. (1986). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Entwistle, N. and Tait, H. (1990). 'Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments', Higher Education 19, 169–194.
Eskola, A., Kihlström, A., Kivinen, D., Weckroth, K. and Ylijoki, O.-H. (1988). Blind Alleys in Social Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Evans, C. (1988). Language People. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Gellert, C. (1992). 'Faculty research', The Encyclopedia of Higher Education 3, 1634–1641.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage Publications.
Greenwood, J.D. (1994). Realism, Identity and Emotion. London: Sage Publications.
Harré, R. (1983a). 'Identity projects', in Breakwell, G. (ed.), Threatened Identities. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons ltd.
Harré, R. (1983b). Personal Being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Haselgrove, S. (Ed.) (1994). The Student Experience. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Huber, L. (1992). 'Editorial', European Journal of Education 27(3), 193–199.
Huber, L. (1989). 'Teaching and learning-students and university teachers', European Journal of Education 24(3), 271–288.
Kleinman, S. (1983). 'Collective matters as individual concerns. Peer culture among graduate students', Urban Life 12(2), 203–225.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). 'What scientists do', in Ibáñez, T. and Íñiguez, L. (eds.), Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Kolb, D.A. (1985). 'Learning styles and disciplinary differences', in Chickering, A. (ed.), The Modern American College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Macintyre, A (1987). After Virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
Moses, I. (1990). 'Teaching, research and scholarship in different disciplines', Higher Education 19, 351–375.
Sheppard, C. and Gilbert, J. (1991). 'Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers', Higher Education 24, 93–111.
Shotter, J. (1994). Conversational Realities. London: Sage Publications.
Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Squires, G. (1990). First Degree. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and Subject in Higher Education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.
Vahala, M.E. and Winston, R.B. (1994). 'College classroom environments: disciplinary and institutional-type differences and effects on academic achievement in introductory courses', Innovative Higher Education 19(2), 99–121.
Vroeijenstijn, T.I. and Acherman, H. (1990). 'Control oriented versus improvement oriented quality assesment', in Goedegebuure, L., Maassen, P. and Westerheijden, D. (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Utrech: Lemma.
Wittrock, B. (1985). 'Dinosaurs or dolphins? Rise and resurgence of the research-oriented university', in Wittrock, B. and Elzinga, A. (eds.), The University Research System. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Ylijoki, O.-H. (1998). Akateemiset heimokulttuurit ja noviisien sosialisaatio (Academic tribal cultures and the socialization of novices). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Ziman, J. (1996). ' “Postacademic science”: constructing knowledge with networks and norms', Science Studies 9(1), 67–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ylijoki, OH. Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying – A case-study of four Finnish university departments. Higher Education 39, 339–362 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003920230873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003920230873