Skip to main content
Log in

The collapsibility theorem in log-linear analysis of categorical data: an application in program evaluation

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The collapsibility theorem describes both the circumstances in which the effects of hierarchical models change when additional variables are introduced, as the circumstances in which the exclusion of certain variables and the analysis of specific marginal tables may lead to different conclusions.

The partial association model is here considered as a specific example of three-dimensional log-linear analysis.

Collapsibility is examined in an empirical study currently being performed in Catalonia with regard to program evaluation in penitentiary centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birch, M. W. (1963). Maximum likelihood in three-way contingency tables, Journal of RoyaJ Statistical Society, B 25: 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M. (1969). Full contingency tables, logits, and split contingency tables, Biometrics 25: 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M. (1971). Effects of collapsing multidimensional contingency tables, Biometrics 27: 545–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C. & Eliason, S. R. (1988). Some common problems in log-linear analysis. In J. S. Long (ed.), Common Problems/Proper solutions. Avoiding error in quantitative Research (pp. 226–257), Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1970). An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41: 907–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1981). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1969). On partitioning X 2 and detecting partial association in three-way contingency tables, Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, B 31: 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1970). The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications, Journal of American Statistics Association 65: 226–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1987). New methods for analyzing the intrinsic character of qualitative variables using cross-classified data, American Journal of Sociology 93: 529–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical Longitudinal Data, Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R. L. (1969). Multidimensional contingency tables. A survey of models and methods, Bulletin International of Statistical Institute 43(1): 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo, S., Pérez, E., Angulo, F., Roca, M. & Azpiazu, M. (Dirs.) (1990). Programes de rehabilitació a les presons. Barcelona: Direcció General de Serveis Penitenciaris i de Rehabilitació, Department de Justícia de la Generalitat de Catalunya.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Algarra, P., Anguera-Argilaga, M.T. The collapsibility theorem in log-linear analysis of categorical data: an application in program evaluation. Quality & Quantity 31, 199–206 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004284528991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004284528991

Navigation