Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy implications of climate forecasts for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Columbia River Basin management system suffers from conflicts over water use and allocation, and vulnerability to climate variability that disrupt hydropower, fisheries, irrigation, water supply, and other vital activities. Climate forecasts have the potential to improve water resource management in this system supporting management decisions that decrease its vulnerability to droughts, floods, and other crises related to climate variability. This study shows that despite the potential utility, managers do not use climate forecasts except for background information. The barriers to managers' use of climate forecasts include low forecast skill, lack of interpretation and demonstrated applications, low geographic resolution, inadequate links to climate variability related impacts, and institutional aversion to incorporating new tools into decision making. To realize the potential of climate forecasts for water resources management, we recommend strategies that include technical improvements to the forecast products, and joint efforts between forecast producers and the management community to develop and demonstrate climate forecast applications through reciprocal and iterative education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernard, D. P., W. A. Kurz, and D. K. Dawson (1995). Assessment of Objective Seasonal Climate Predictions. Report of aWorkshop held inVictoria, B.C. on June 27–29, 1995. Prepared by ESSA Technologies Ltd.,Vancouver, B.C. for Canadian Institute for Climate Studies, Victoria, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (1991). Columbia River System Operation Review: Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

  • Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (1995). Columbia River System Operation Review: Final Environmental Impact Statement.

  • Bonneville Power Administration (1996). Personal communication.

  • Bureau of Reclamation, Natural Resource Conservation Service (1996). Personal communication.

  • Changnon, S. A. (1992). ‘Contents of climate predictions desired by agricultural decision-makers,’ Journal of AppliedMeteorology 31: 1488–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changnon, S. A., J. M. Changnon and D. Changnon (1995). ‘Uses and applications of climate forecasts for power utilities,’ Bulletin of the AmericanMeteorological Society 76: 711–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changnon, S. A., J. M. Changnon and D. Changnon (1994). ‘Uses and applications of climate forecasts for power utilities,’ Bulletin of the AmericanMeteorological Society 76: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Prediction Center (1997). Web page at http://nic.fb4.noaa.gov:80/products/predictions.

  • Fleagle, R. and A. H. Murphy (1980). ‘The use of climate information in management of the Columbia River,’ in L. Pocinki and R. S. Greeley, eds., Climate and Risk, Vol. II. MITRE Corp. MTR-80W322–02.

  • Glantz, Michael H. (1982). ‘Consequences and responsibilities in drought forecasting: The case of Yakima, 1977,’ Water Resources Research 18: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds. (1995). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. NewYork: Columbia University Press, pp. 214–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kai N. (1989). ‘The Columbia River Basin: Experimenting with sustainability,’ Environment 31: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kai N. (1995). ‘Deliberately seeking sustainability in the Columbia River Basin,’ in L.H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds., Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. NewYork: Columbia University Press, pp. 214–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantua, Nathan (1996). The Relationship between Columbia River Annual Flow and the El Ni·o Southern Oscillation. Unpublished manuscript. Report for the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans. Seattle,W.A.: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Environmental Prediction (1996). Personal communication.

  • National Research Council (1996). Learning to Predict Climate Variations Associated with El Niño and the Southern Oscillation: Accomplishments and Legacies of the TOGA Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 171 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (1996). Personal communication.

  • Northwest Power Planning Council (1982, 1987). Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, OR.

  • NPPC (1996). Personal communication.

  • Northwest River Forecast Center (1996). Personal communication.

  • Oregon Conservation Service (1996). Personal communication.

  • Office of Technology Assessment/U.S. Congress (1993). Preparing for an Uncertain Climate, Vol. I, Chapter 5, ‘Water,’ pp.-209–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Environment Quality (1996). Personal communication.

  • Pacific Northwest Waterways Association (1996). Personal communication.

  • Pulwarty, R. S., K. T. Redmond (1996). ‘An assessment of the role of climate forecasts in the management of salmon, water and hydropower in the Columbia River Basin,’ submitted to the Bulletin of the AmericanMeteorological Society, March, 1996.

  • Schmeling, M. (1997). Personal communication. Puget Sound Power and Light, Bellevue, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seattle City Light (1996). Personal communication.

  • Sonka, S. T., S. A. Changnon, Jr. and S. L. Hoffing (1992). ‘How agribusiness uses climate predictions: Implications for climate research and provision of predictions,’ Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 73 (12): 1999–2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Reclamation (1996). Personal communication.

  • White, Richard (1995). The OrganicMacine. NewYork: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Richard (1996). Personal communication. Seattle,WA: History Department, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Department of Ecology (1996). Personal communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Oceans (JISAO)/School of Marine Affairs (SMA) Climate Impacts, Group, University of Washington, the Hayes Center, U.S.A

    Bridget Callahan, Edward Miles & David Fluharty

Authors
  1. Bridget Callahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward Miles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Fluharty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callahan, B., Miles, E. & Fluharty, D. Policy implications of climate forecasts for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest. Policy Sciences 32, 269–293 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004604805647

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004604805647

Keywords

Search

Navigation