Abstract
Participatory planning and policy analysis has gained increasing attention in recent years because of its potential to improve the knowledge base for policy design (substantive benefits), increase the likelihood of stakeholder compliance and support (instrumental benefits), and strengthen the democratic legitimacy of public policies (normative benefits). Deliberation among stakeholders is considered essential for participatory policy analysis, representing a democratic process for clarifying the particular as well as the collective goals and values as well as the potential impacts of alternative policies. This study examines the effects of democratic deliberation on participants' viewpoints of the policy domain (the local food system), based on two-and-a-half day participatory planning events in each of six rural counties in northern New York. Participant viewpoints were assessed several weeks before and after these events, using Q methodology. The results reveal three major viewpoints, representing concerns for social justice, the viability of conventional agriculture, and the potential environmental and social externalities associated with conventional agriculture. The substance of these viewpoints remain unchanged before and after the deliberative events, but the salience of the conventional agriculture viewpoint increased and the salience of the social justice and alternative agriculture viewpoints decreased significantly, even among those participants who most clearly defined the latter two viewpoints. These findings, together with an analysis of the action agendas emerging from these planning events, suggest that local deliberative processes may produce outcomes that are neither fair nor efficient and that reflect the values and interests of certain stakeholders more than others, even in the absence of overt conflict. Moreover, it appears that such processes may cause some participants to alter their viewpoints in ways that appear contrary to their values and interests as expressed prior to the deliberative event. The implications for participatory policy analysis are explored.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C.W. (1993). ‘Recommending a scheme of reason: Political theory, policy science, and democracy,’ Policy Sciences 26: 215–227.
Barker, A. and B.G. Peters (1993). The Politics of Expert Advise: Creating, Using andManipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bobrow, D. B. and J. S. Dryzek (1987). Policy Analysis and Design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bolland, J. M. (1985). ‘The search for structure: An alternative to the forced Q-sort technique,’ PoliticalMethodology 11: 91–107.
Bovens, M. and P. van 't Hart (1966). Understanding Policy Fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Brown, S.R. (1971). ‘The forced-free distinction in Q technique,’ Journal of Educational Measurement 8: 283–287.
Brown, S. (1980). Political Subjectivity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Cobb, R.W. and M.H. Ross, eds. (1997). Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial: Avoidance, Attack, and Redefinition. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Cottle, C. E. and B. F. McKeown (1980). ‘The forced-free distinction in Q technique: A note on unused categories in the Q sort continuum,’ Operant Subjectivity 3: 58–63.
Dahl, R. (1979). ‘Procedural democracy,’ in Laslett and Fishkin, eds., Politics and Society, vol. 5. New Haven: Yale University Press.
deLeon, P. (1994). ‘Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77–95.
deLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dryzek, J. S. and D. Torgerson (1993). ‘Democracy and the policy sciences: A progress report,’ Policy Sciences 26: 127–137.
Dunn, W.D. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Durning, D. (1993). ‘Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study,’ Journal of Public Policy Analysis andManagement 12: 231–257.
Emery, F. and R. Purser (1996). The Search Conference: A Powerful Method for Planning Organizational Change and Community Action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Expositor (1992). ‘A note on measuring changes in Q factor loadings,’ Operant Subjectivity 15 (2): 56–61.
Feldman, S. and J. Zaller (1992). ‘The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state,’ American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 268–307.
Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fischer, F. (1993). ‘Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases,’ Policy Sciences 26: 165–187.
Fischer, F. and J. Forester, eds. (1987). Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.
Guba, E.G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hamilton, E. (1992). Adult Education for Community Development. New York: Greenwood Press.
Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human Judgement and Social Policy: Incredible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kenny, C. B. (1994). ‘The microenvironment of attitude change,’ The Journal of Politics 56 (3): 715–728.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Kraak, V., D. L. Pelletier, U. Uusitalo and C. McCullum (1998). The Orientations of Food System Stakeholders Concerning Community Food Security: Findings from New York State's North Country. Ithaca, NY: Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University.
Krosnick, J. A. (1991). ‘The stability of political preferences: Comparisons of symbolic and nonsymbolic attitudes,’ American Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 547–576.
Kuklinksy, J. H., R.C. Luskin and J. Bolland (1991). ‘Where is the schema? Going beyond the “S” word in political psychology,’ American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1341–1356.
Kuklinsky, J. H. and N. L. Hurley (1994). ‘On hearing an interpreting of political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking,’ The Journal of Politics 56 (3): 729–751.
Lasswell, H.D. (1951). ‘The policy orientation,’ in D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell, eds., The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope andMethod. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lau, R.R., R.A. Smith and S.T. Fiske (1991). ‘Political beliefs, policy interpretations and political persuasion,’ The Journal of Politics 53 (3): 644–673.
Leighley, J. (1991). ‘Participation as a stimulus of political conceptualization,’ The Journal of Politics 53 (1): 198–211.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Marcus, G. E. and M. B. MacKuen (1993). ‘Anxiety, enthusiasm and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns,’ American Political Science Reviews 87 (3): 672–684.
McCullum, C., D. Pelletier, V. Kraak, J. Wilkins (1998). ‘Understanding issues of participation and power within a community-driven food security initiative in New York's North Country.’ Paper presented at the Joint Annual Meetings of the Association for the Study of Food and Society and Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society, San Francisco, California, June 4th-7th, 1998.
National Research Council (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democartic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pelletier, D. L., V. Kraak, C. McCullum, U. Uusitalo and R. E. Rich (n.d. (a)). ‘Community food security: Salience and participation at community level,’ submitted to Agriculture and HumanValues.
Pelletier, D. L.,V. Kraak, C. McCullum and U. Uusitalo (n.d. (b)). ‘Values, public policy and community food security,’ submitted to Agriculture and Human values.
PQ Method, version 2.0 (1997). http://www.rz.unibw-muenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod.
Renn, O., T. Webler, P. Wiedemann (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rochefort, D.A. and R.W. Cobb, eds. (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Rosenhead, J., ed. (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Savage, G. (1996). The Social Construction of Expertise: The English Civil Service and Its In£uence, 1919–1939. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schill, W. J. (1966). ‘Unforced and group response to a Q-sort,’ Journal of Experimental Education 34 (4): 19–20.
Staples, L. (1997). ‘Selecting and “cutting” the issue,’ in M. Minkler, ed., Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Stern, P.C. and H.V. Fineberg, eds. (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
SUNY Potsdam (1996). Socio-economic Pro¢le of the North Country. William C.Merwin Rural Services Institute, Potsdam, NY: SUNY Potsdam.
USDA. Census of Agriculture, 1964 and 1992. Washington, DC.
Walzer, N., (1996). Community StrategicVisioning Programs. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Zaller, J. R. (1992).The Nature and Origins ofMass Opinion. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C. et al. The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country. Policy Sciences 32, 103–131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004641300366
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004641300366