Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of chemical composition of legume residues and initial soil pH on pH change of a soil after residue incorporation

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reports on the effect of organic matter addition on soil pH have been contradictory. This study examined the effect of applying legume residues differing in concentrations of N (4.3-45.5 mg g-1) and excess cations/organic anions (0.22–1.56 mmol g-1) on pH change of five soils differing in initial pH (3.60–5.58 in 0.01 M CaCl2) under sterile and non-sterile conditions. Addition of the legume residues at a level of 1% soil weight increased the pH of all soils by up to 2 units after incubation for 35 and 100 d under non-sterile conditions. Exceptions were the Lancelin (initial pH 5.06) and Kellerberin (pH 5.58) soils with addition of clover roots (excess cations 22 cmol/kg) for 100 d where soil pH decreased by 0.13–0.15 units as compared to the control. The amounts of alkalinity produced in soil correlated positively with concentrations of excess cations and total nitrogen of the added legume residues, and negatively with the initial pH of the soil. When soil was fumigated with chloroform during incubation, similar trends of soil pH changes and alkalinity production, due to legume residues addition, were displayed but the effects of the residue on alkalinity production in the Wodjil and Lancelin soils were much less than under non-sterile conditions. Direct shaking of soil with the residues under sterile conditions increased the amount of alkalinity in the soils with initial pH of 3.60–4.54, but not in the soils with initial pH of 5.06 and 5.58. The maximal alkalinity production was less than one third of that produced in the soil after 100 d of incubation under non-sterile conditions. The results suggest that the direction and the magnitude of pH change depend largely on the concentration of organic anions in the residues, initial soil pH and the degree of residue decomposition. The incorporation of crop residues, especially those with high concentrations of excess cations, is recommended in minimizing soil acidification in farming systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken R L and Moody P W 1994 The effect of valance and ionic strength on the measurement of pH buffer capacity. Aust. J. Soil Res. 32, 975–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan N S, Hedley M J and White R E 1991 Processes of soil acidi-fication during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures. Plant Soil 134, 53–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn B A and Fish W 1991 Variability in the measurement of humic carboxyl content. Environ. Sci. Tech. 25, 232–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartipa N C and Gilbeaut D M 1993 Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolling P J 1995 Effect of lupins and location on soil acidification rates Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 35, 753–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshleman K N and Hemond H F 1985 The role of organic acids in the acid-base status of surface waters at Bickford Watershed, Massachusetts. Wat. Resource Res. 21, 1503–1510.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helyar K R and Porter W M 1989 Soil acidification, its measurement and the processes involved. In Soil Acidity and Plant Growth. Ed. A D Robson. pp 61–101. Academic Press Australia, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt P B and Turner R C 1975 Effects of organic materials added to very acid soils on pH, aluminum, exchangeable NHC4 + and crop yield. Soil Sci. 119, 227–237.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hue N V and Amien I 1989 Aluminum detoxification with green manures. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 20, 1499–1511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis S C and Robson A D 1983 The effects of nitrogen nutrition of plants on the development of acidity in Western Australian soils. I. Effects with subterranean clover grown under leaching conditions. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 341–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis S C, Stockdale E A, Shepherd M A and Powlson D S 1996 Nitrogen mineralization in temperate agricultural soils: Processes and measurements. Adv. Agron. 57, 187–235.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K 1994 Symbiotic dinitrogen fixation – its dependence on plant nutrition and its ecophysiological impact. Z. Planzenernähr Bodenkd. 157, 233–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K and Steffens D 1982 Beziehung zwischen kationen/anionen-aufnahme von rotklee und protonenabscheidung der wurzeln. Z. Planzenernähr Bodenkd. 145, 229–236.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motavalli P P, Palm C A, Parton W J, Elliott E T and Frey S D 1995 Soil pH and organic C dynamics in tropical forest soils: Evidence from laboratory and simulation studies. Soil Biol Biochem 27, 1589–1599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble A D, Zenneck I and Randall P J 1996 Leaves litter ash alkalinity and neutralisation of soil acidity. Plant Soil 179, 293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre W H and Banwart W L 1973 Excess base and excess base/nitrogen ratios of various crop species and plant parts. Agron. J. 65, 91–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pocknee S and Sumner M E 1997 Cation and nitrogen contents of organic matter determine its soil liming potential. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie G S P and Dolling P J 1985 The role of organic matter in soil acidification. Aust. J. Soil Res. 23, 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson A D and Abbott L K 1989 The effect of soil acidity on microbial activity in soils. In Soil Acidity and Plant Growth. Ed. AD Robson pp 139–165. Academic Press Australia, Sydney.

  • Tang C 1998 Factors affecting soil acidification under legumes I. Effect of potassium supply. Plant Soil 199, 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, McLay C D A and Barton L 1997 A comparison of the potential proton excretion of 12 pasture legumes grown in nutrient solution. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 37, 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Robson A D and Adams H 1995 High Ca is not the primary factor in poor growth of Lupinus angustifolius L. in high pH soil. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46, 1051–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Sparling G P, McLay C D A and Raphael C 1999 Effect of short-term legume residue decomposition on soil acidity. Aust. J. Soil Res. 37, 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian G, Kang B T and Brussaard L 1992 Biological effects of plant residues with contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions – decomposition and nutrient release. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 1051–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A and Black I A 1934 An examination of the Degtjareffe method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C H 1980 Soil acidification under clover pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 561–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong MT F and Swift R S 1995 Amelioration of aluminium phytotoxicity with organic matter. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Eds. RA Date, NJ Grundon, GE Rayment and ME Probert. pp 41–45. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Yan F, Schubert S and Mengel K 1996 Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, C., Yu, Q. Impact of chemical composition of legume residues and initial soil pH on pH change of a soil after residue incorporation. Plant and Soil 215, 29–38 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004704018912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004704018912

Navigation