Skip to main content
Log in

Aristotelian Categories And Cognitive Domains

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper puts together an ancientand a recent approach to classificatory language, thought, and ontology.It includes on the one hand an interpretation of Aristotle's ten categories,with remarks on his first category, called (or translated as) substancein the Categories or What a thing is in the Topics. On the other hand is the ideaof domain-specific cognitive abilities urged in contemporary developmentalpsychology. Each family of ideas can be used to understand the other. Neitherthe metaphysical nor the psychological approach is intrinsically morefundamental; they complement each other. The paper incidentally clarifies distinct uses of the word “category” in different disciplines, and also attempts to make explicit several notions of “domain”. It also examines Aristotle's most exotic and least discussed categories, being-in-a-position (e.g., sitting) and having-(on) (e.g., armour). Finally the paper suggests a tentative connectionbetween Fred Sommers' theory of types and Aristotle's first category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackrill, J. L. (trans. and ed.): 1963, Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. and P.M. S. Hacker: 1980, Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1966, Kant's Analytic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1967, Review of Sommers (1963), Nelson (1964), De Sousa (1966), and a reply by Sommers to Nelson, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 32, 406-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1971, Review of Sommers (1959, 1965), and six papers about Sommers, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 36, 666-670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E.: 1966, Problèmes de Linguistique Générale, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L.: 1990, ‘Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children’, Cognitive Science 14, 107-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. and E. Spelke: 1995, ‘Domain Specific Knowledge and Conceptual Change’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (dy1995), pp. 206-245.

  • Carey, S.: 1985, Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R.: 1966, ‘The Tree of English Bears Bitter Fruit’, The Journal of Philosophy 63, 37-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1983, The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: [1892]/1952, ‘On Sense and Reference’, in M. Black and P. Geach (trans. and eds), Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. and Hirschfeld, L. A.: 1998, ‘How Biological is Essentialism’, in D. Medin and S. Atran (eds), Folk Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernet, J.: 1985, China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, C. M.: 1925/1979, ‘The Aristotelian Categories’, in J. Barnes, M. Schofield and R. Sorabji (eds), Articles on Aristotle: 3. Metaphysics, pp. 1-12.

  • Goodman, N.: 1954, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, University of London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking, Hackett, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. E.: 1997, What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1994, ‘Entrenchment’, in D. Stalker (ed.), GRUE, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 183-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, L. A. and S. A. Gelman (eds): 1994a, Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, L. A. and S. A. Gelman: 1994b, ‘Toward a Topography of Mind: An Introduction to Domain Specificity’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman, 1994a, pp. 3-36.

  • Hirschfeld, L. A.: 1996, Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child's Construction of Human Kinds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T.: 1988, Aristotle's First Principles, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C.: 1979, Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, M.: 1991, ‘Beyond Modularity: Innate Constraints and Developmental Change’, in S. Carey and R. Gelman (eds), The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition, L. Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 171-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C.: 1981, ‘Constraints on Knowledge and Cognitive Development: An Ontological Perspective’, Psychological Review 88, 197-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C.: 1989, Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C.: 1994, ‘The Birth and Nurturance of Concepts by Domains: The Origins of Concepts of Living Things’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman 1994a, pp. 234-254.

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, A.: 1997, ‘Categories’, in T. Honderich (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 125-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Teach about the Human Mind, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W.: [1765]/1981, in P. Remnant and J. Bennett (trans. and eds), New Essays on Human Understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux, M.: 1997, ‘Kinds and Predications: An Examination of Aristotle's Theory of Categories’, Philosophical Papers 26, 3-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J.: 1997, ‘Ontological Categories and Natural Kinds’, Philosophical Papers 26, 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L.: 1989, ‘Concepts and Conceptual Structure’, American Psychologist 44, 1469-1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melland, J. W.: 1987, ‘Category’, in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1843/1970, ‘A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation’, in J. Robson (ed.) Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols 7-8, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, R.: 1998, ‘Grades of Commitment in Cognitive Science’, Synthese 114, 463-495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. O.: 1964, ‘On Sommers' Reinstatement of Russell's Ontological Program’, The Philosophical Review 73, 517-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmerini, M.: 1980, Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers 2, 215-271.

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Natural Kinds’, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1938, ‘Categories’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 38 (1937–1938, paper read on 25 April 1938), pp. 189-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1954, Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, F.: 1959, ‘The Ordinary Language Tree’, Mind 68, 160-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, F.: 1963, ‘Types and Ontology’, The Philosophical Review 72, 327-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, F.: 1965, ‘Predicability’, in Max Black (ed.), Philosophy in America: Essays, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 262-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., D. Premack, and A. Premack (eds): 1995, Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1959, Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1970, ‘Categories’, in O. P. Wood and G. Pitcher (eds.), Ryle, Doubleday, New York, pp. 181-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricot, J. (trans. and ed.): 1997, Aristotle: Organon, Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J.: 1866, The Logic of Chance. An Essay on the Foundations and Province of the Theory of Probability, with Special Reference to its Application in Moral and Social Science, Macmillan, London and Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardy, R.: 1992, ‘Chinese Whispers’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 38, 149-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardy, R.: 2000, Aristotle on China: Language, Categories and Translation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William: 1840, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2 vols, Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. B. and S. E. Piggott: 1999, ‘Neurological Basis of Consciousness’, Neurological Review 56, 153-157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hacking, I. Aristotelian Categories And Cognitive Domains. Synthese 126, 473–515 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005221431872

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005221431872

Keywords

Navigation