Abstract
We investigate the notion of relevance as it pertains to ‘commonsense’, subjunctive conditionals. Relevance is taken here as a relation between a property (such as having a broken wing) and a conditional (such as birds typically fly). Specifically, we explore a notion of ‘causative’ relevance, distinct from ‘evidential’ relevance found, for example, in probabilistic approaches. A series of postulates characterising a minimal, parsimonious concept of relevance is developed. Along the way we argue that no purely logical account of relevance (even at the metalevel) is possible. Finally, and with minimal restrictions, an explicit definition that agrees with the postulates is given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, A. R. and Belnap Jr., N. D.: 1994, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I, Princeton University Press.
Boutilier, C.: 1994, ‘Conditional Logics of Normality: A Modal Approach’, Artificial Intelligence 68(1), 87–154.
Burgess, J. P.: 1981, ‘Quick Completeness Proofs for Some Logics of Conditionals’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22(1), 76–84.
Darwiche, A. and Pearl, J.: 1994, ‘Symbolic Causal Networks’, in Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, pp. 238–244.
Delgrande, J. P.: 1987, ‘A First-Order Conditional Logic for Prototypical Properties’, Artificial Intelligence 33(1), 105–130.
Dubois, D., Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A., and Prade, H.: 1994, ‘An Ordinal View of Independence with Application to Plausible Reasoning’, in Uncertainty in AI'94, Seattle, WA.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1978, ‘On the Logic of Relevance’, Synthese 37(3), 351–367.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Goodman, N.: 1961, ‘About’, Mind 70, 1–24.
Goodman, N.: 1973, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Bobbs Merrill Co., Inc.
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J.: 1968, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen and Co. Ltd.
Lamarre, Philippe: 1991, ‘S4 as the Conditional Logic of Nonmonotonicity’, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA, pp. 357–367.
Levy, A. Y. and Sagiv, Y.: 1993, ‘Exploiting Irrelevance Reasoning to Guide Problem Solving’, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambéry, Fr., pp. 138–144.
Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press.
Loveland, David W.: 1978, Automated Theorem Proving: A Logical Basis, North-Holland Inc., N.Y.
McCarthy, J.: 1986, ‘Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common-Sense Knowledge’, Artificial Intelligence 28, 89–116.
Nilsson, N. J.: 1980, Principles of Artificial Intelligence, Tioga Pub. Co.
Nute, D.: 1980, Topics in Conditional Logic, Volume 20 of Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, D. Reidel Pub. Co.
Pearl, J.: 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.
Pearl, J.: 1990, ‘System Z: A Natural Ordering of Defaults with Tractable Applications to Nonmonotonic Reasoning’, in Proc. of the Third Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Pacific Grove, Ca., pp. 121–135.
Schlesinger, G. N.: 1986, ‘Relevance’, Theoria 52, 57–67.
Stalnaker, R. C.: 1968, ‘A Theory of Conditionals’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 98–112.
Subramanian, D. and Genesereth, M. R.: 1987, ‘The Relevance of Irrelevance’, in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Milan, Italy, pp. 416–422
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delgrande, J., Pelletier, F. A Formal Analysis of Relevance. Erkenntnis 49, 137–173 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005363424168
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005363424168