Skip to main content
Log in

Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rule following is often made an unnecessary mystery in the philosophy of social science. One form of mystification is the issue of 'rule finitism', which raises the puzzle as to how a learner can possibly extend the rule to applications beyond those examples which have been given as instruction in the rule. Despite the claim that this problem originated in the work of Wittgenstein, it is clear that his philosophical method is designed to evaporate, not perpetuate, such problems. The supposed problem of rule finitism is malformed, deriving from misconceptions about the relation between understanding a rule and making an application of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, G. and Hacker, P. (1984). Language, Sense and Nonsense. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., Bloor, D. and Henry, D. (1996). Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J. and Sharrock, W. (1995). Computers, Minds and Conduct. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (1981). Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Social Studies in Science 11 (1): 3-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. (1980). The fate of ordinary language philosophy. Philosophical Investigations 3 (2): 1-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (Ed.) (1991). The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionally and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A. (1990). Can philosophy tell us what is social?, Occassional Papers, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.

  • Pickering, A. (1992). Science as Culture and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W. and Reid, R. (forthcoming). Kripke's conjuring trick. Unpublished paper.

  • Turner, S. (1994). The Social Theory of Practices. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1990). The Idea of a Social Science, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharrock, W., Button, G. Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following. Human Studies 22, 193–210 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005488417568

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005488417568

Keywords

Navigation