Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coping with breast cancer: a cluster analytic approach

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to generate distinct clusters of women with breast cancer, and to evaluate differences between clusters with respect to decisional control, psychological adjustment, and frustration expression. Thirty‐seven Stage I and 33 Stage II newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from two medical oncology clinics participated. A cluster analysis of the coping data produced three distinct patient clusters. The primary finding was that women from the low avoidance coping cluster were significantly better adjusted than women from the remaining clusters. Women from the low avoidance coping cluster also preferred more active involvement in treatment decision‐making. Further research is needed to prospectively detail the mechanisms by which cognitive avoidance hampers psychological adjustment to cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weisman AD, Worden JW: The existential plight in cancer: Significance of the first 100 days. Int J Psychiatry Med 7: 1–15, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Payne DK, Sullivan MD, Massie MJ: Women's psychological reactions to breast cancer. Semin Oncol 23 (1 suppl 2): 89–97, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christ GH: A model for the development of psychosocial interventions. Recent Results Cancer Res 121: 301–312, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moos RH, Schaefer JA: Life transitions and crises: A conceptual overview. In: Moos RH (ed) Coping with Life Crises: An Integrated Approach. Plenum, New York, 1986, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor SE: Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. Am Psychol 38: 1161–1173, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burgess C, Morris T, Pettingale KW: Psychological response to cancer diagnosis: II. Evidence for coping styles (coping styles and cancer diagnosis). J Psychosom Res 32: 263–272, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV: Attributions, beliefs about control and adjustment to breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 46: 489–502, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herth KA: The relationship between level of hope and level of coping response and other variables in patients with cancer. Oncol Nurse Forum 16: 67–72, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  9. Classen C, Koopman C, Angell K, Spiegel D: Coping styles associated with psychological adjustment to advanced breast cancer. Health Psychol 15: 434–437, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carver, CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, Noriega V, Scheier MF, Robinson DS, Ketcham AS, Moffat FL Jr, Clark KC: How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 65: 375–390, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stanton AL, Snider PR: Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: A prospective study. Health Psychol 12: 16–23, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB: Information and decision-making preference of hospitalized cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 27: 1139–1145, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandt B: Informational needs and selected variables in patients receiving brachytherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 18: 1221–1229, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V: Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92: 832–836, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O'Neil J, Bilodeau B, Watson P, Mueller B: Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277: 1485–1492, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  16. Degner LF, Russell CA: Preferences for treatment control adults with cancer. Res Nurs Health 11: 367–374, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  17. Degner LF, Sloan JA: Decision-making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45: 941–950, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG: Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 39: 279–289, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE: Cancer patients: Their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R SocMed 82: 260–263, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cassileth BR, Volckmar D, Goodman RL: The effect of experience on radiation therapy patients' desire for information. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 6: 493–496, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baltrusch HJ, Stangel W, Waltz ME: Cancer from the biobehavioral perspective: The Type C pattern. Act Nerv Super Praha 30: 18–21, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Temoshok L: Personality, coping style, emotion and cancer: Towards an integrative model. Cancer Surv 6: 545–567, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  23. Everitt BS, Dunn G: Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Halsted Press, New York, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson DV, Friedman LC, Baer PE, Lane M, Smith FE: Subtypes of psychosocial adjustment to breast cancer. J Behav Med 17: 127–141, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro DE, Boggs SR, Rodrigue JR, Urry HL, Algina JJ, Hellman R, Ewen F: Stage II breast cancer: Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy. J Psychosom Res 43: 143–157, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro DE, Rodrigue JR, Boggs SR, Robinson ME: Cluster analysis of the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire: Evidence for coping with cancer styles? J Psychosom Res 38: 151–159, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moos RH: Coping Responses Inventory Manual. Stanford University and Veterans Administration Medical Centers, Palo Alto, CA, 1988 (Unpublished manuscript)

  28. Moos RH: Coping Responses Inventory: A measure of approach and avoidance coping skills. In: Zalaquett CP, Wood RJ (eds) Evaluating Stress: a Book of Resources. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD, 1997, pp 51–65

    Google Scholar 

  29. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF: Manual for the Profile of Mood States. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, CA, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andrykowski MA, Curran SL, Studts JL, Cunningham L, Carpenter JS, McGrath PC, Sloan DA, Kenady DE: Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women with breast cancer and benign breast problems: A controlled comparison. J Clin Epidemiol 49: 827–834, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bloom JR, Ross RD, Burnell G: The effect of social support on patient adjustment after breast surgery. Patient Counselling and Health Education 1: 50–59, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L: Breast cancer survivors: Psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38: 183–199, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koopman C, Hermanson K, Diamond S, Angell K, Spiegel D: Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer. Psychooncol 7: 101–111, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  34. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lippman M, D'Angelo T, Lee J: Immunological and psychosocial predictors of disease recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Behav Med 17: 67–75, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  35. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Maluish AM, Schlien B, Lippman M: Prognostic risk assessment in primary breast cancer by behavioral and immunological parameters. Health Psychol 4: 99–113, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  36. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Whiteside T, Sanzo K, Lee J, Kirkwood J: Perceived social support and tumor estrogen/ progesterone receptor status as predictors of natural killer cell activity in breast cancer patients. Psychosom Med 52: 73–85, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mathieson CM, Stam HJ: Quality of life and psychological state: Relationships and limitations of measures. 1991 (Unpublished manuscript)

  38. Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Yalom I: Group support for patients with metastatic cancer: A randomized outcome study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 527–533, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  39. Spielberger CD: Self-Rating Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment Resources, 1988

  40. Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an object function. J Statist Assoc 58: 236–244, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  41. Blashfield RK:Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychol Bull 83: 377–388, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  42. Edelbrock C: Comparing the accuracy of hierarchical clustering algorithms: The problem of classifying everybody. Multivariate Behav Res 14: 367–384, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  43. Edelbrock C, McLaughlin B: Hierarchical cluster analysis using intraclass correlations: A mixture model study. Multivariate Behav Res 15: 299–318, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kuiper FK, Fisher LA: A Monte Carlo comparison of six clustering procedures. Biometrics 31: 777–783, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  45. Milligan GW: An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrica 45: 325–342, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  46. Milligan GW, Isaac PD: The validation of four ultrametric clustering algorithms. Pattern Recog 12: 41–50, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mojena R: Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An evaluation. Comput J 20: 359–363, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  48. Overall JE, Gibson JM, Novy DM: Population recovery capabilities of 35 cluster analysis methods. J Clin Psychol 49: 459–470, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hair JH, Rolph EA, Taitham RL: Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings (2nd ed.). MacMillan, New York, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  50. Blashfield RK: Propositions regarding the use of cluster analysis in clinical research. J Consult Clin Psychol 48: 456–459, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guadagnoli E, Mor V: Measuring cancer patients' affect: Revision and psychometric properties of the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Psychological Assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1: 150–154, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reynolds P, Kaplan GA: Social connections and risk for cancer: Prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. Behav Med 16: 101–110, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  53. Margarey CJ, Todd PB, Blizzard PJ: Psychosocial factors in-fluencing delay and breast self-examination in women with symptoms of breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 11: 229–232, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  54. Manuel GM, Roth S, Keefe FJ, Brantley BA: Coping with cancer. J Human Stress 13: 149–158, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  55. Watson M, Greer S, Blake S, Shrapnell K: Reaction to a diagnosis of breast cancer: Relationship between denial, delay and rates of psychological morbidity. Cancer 53: 2008–2012, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dean C, Surtees PG: Do psychological factors predict survival in breast cancer? J Psychosom Res 33: 561–569, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Coping and adaptation. In: Gentry WD (ed) Handbook of Behavioral Medicine. Guilford, New York, 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    Thomas F. Hack

  2. Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    Lesley F. Degner

Authors
  1. Thomas F. Hack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lesley F. Degner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hack, T.F., Degner, L.F. Coping with breast cancer: a cluster analytic approach. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54, 185–194 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006145504850

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006145504850

Search

Navigation