Skip to main content
Log in

Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in cotton

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient in vitro plant regeneration system characterized by rapid and continuous production of somatic embryos using leaf and stem explants of abnormal seedling as an explant have been developed in Gossypium hirsutum L. Embryogenic callus and somatic embryos have been obtained directly from the explants of cotton abnormal seedlings. Plant growth regulators influenced the induction of cotton somatic embryogenesis. The optimal medium for direct somatic embryogenesis was modified MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg l-1 ZT and 2 g l-1 activated carbon. On this medium, an average of 28.0 and 28.1 matured somatic embryos formed from per leaf and stem explants respectively. The highest frequency of somatic embryogenesis was 100%. The somatic embryos were converted into normal plantlets when cultured on modified MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg l-1 ZT. Upon transfer to soil, plants grew well and appeared normal. Plants could be regenerated within 60–80 days. The system of cotton somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration described here will facilitate the application of plant tissue culture and genetic engineering on cotton genetic improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidonis GH& Hamilton (1983) Plant regeneration from callus tissue of Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Science Letter 32: 89–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng R, Zhang BH, Zhang WS& Wang QL (1998) Genotype analysis in cotton tissue culture and plant regeneration. In: Larkin PJ (ed.) Agricultural Biotechnology: Laboratory, Field and Market. Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Ag ricultural Biotechnology, Darwin 13–16 July l998 (pp. 161–163). Canberra, UTC Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ (1988) Plant regeneration from somatic embryogenic suspension cultures of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Cell Reports 7: 399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ& McMullen MD (1990) Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 8: 586–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ& Smith RH (1984) Initiation of callus and somatic embryos from explants of mature cotton (Gossypium klotzschianum Anderess). Plant Cell Reports 3: 41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firoozabady E& DeBoer DL (1993) Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in many cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biology 29P: 166–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel NJ& Robacker CD (1990) Somatic embryogenesis in two Gossypium hirsutum genotypes on semi-solid versus liquid proliferation media. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 23: 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S& Pental D (1998) Regeneration of Indian cotton variety MCU-5 through somatic embryogenesis. Current Science 74: 538–540

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DE& Martinell BJ (1993) Transformation of elite cotton cultivars via particle bombardment of meristems. Biotechnology 11: 596–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters M, Willems K& Swennen R (1994) Protoplasm to plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 312) using feeder layers. Plant Cell Reports 13: 208–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekraran K, Grula JW, Hudspeth RL, Pofelis S& Anderson DM (1996) Herbicide-resistant Acala and Coker cotton transformed with a native gene encoding mutant forms of acetohydroxy acid syntheses. Molecular Breeding 2: 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemker RL, Couche LJ& Galbraith DW (1986) Characterization of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Reports 3: 178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trolinder NL& Chen ZX (1989) Genotype specificity of the somatic embryogenesis reponse in cotton. Plant Cell Reports 8: 133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trolinder NL& Goodin JR (1987) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Cell Reports 6: 231–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck P, Tohnson G, Barton K& Swain W (1987) Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plant. Biotechnology 5: 263–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voo KS, Rugh CL& Kamalay JC (1991) Indirect somatic embryogenesis and plant recovery from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biology 27P: 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BH, Feng R, Li XL& Li FL (1996) Anther culture and plant regeneration of cotton (Gossypium klotzschianum Anderss). Chinese Science Bulletin 41: 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BH, Feng R, Liu F& Yao CB (1999) Direct induction of cotton somatic embryogenesis. Chinese Science Bulletin 44: 766–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BH, Li XL, Li FL& Li FG (1993) Plant recovery from cotton somatic embryos. Acta Agricultural Boreali-occidentalis Sinica 2(4): 24–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BH, Li XL, Li FL& Li FG (1996) Development of abnormal plantlets and their normalization during cotton tissue culture. Acta Botanica Sinica 38: 845–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BH& Zhao BS (1997) Cotton Biotechnology and Its Application. China Agricultural Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Q, Dessai AP& Prakash CS (1996) Rapid and repetitive plant regeneration in sweet potato via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 15: 381–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bao-Hong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, BH., Liu, F. & Yao, CB. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in cotton. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 60, 89–94 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006488119200

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006488119200

Navigation