Abstract
The conditions necessary for evolution are amplification, mutagenesis and selection. Here we describe the evolutionary response of an in vitro replicating system to the selection pressure for fast growth and show what happens to the amplified molecules within this replication system. Our emphasis is on methodology, on the monitoring and the automation of experiments in molecular evolution. In order to perform in vitro studies on the evolution of RNA molecules, a modified self-sustained sequence replication (3SR) method was used. In the first step of the 3SR reaction, the RNA template is reversely transcribed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, followed by a second strand synthesis and the transcription of the resulting dsDNA by T7 RNA polymerase. The selection pressure (fast growth) was achieved by applying the principle of serial transfer pioneered in the laboratories of Sol Spiegelman and Leslie Orgel. At the end of the exponential growth phase of the 3SR reaction, an aliquot of the reaction mixture is transfered into a new sample containing only buffer, nucleotides and enzymes while RNA template molecules are provided by the transfer. The conditions in the exponential growth phase allow the RNA molecules to be amplified in a constant environment; all enzymes (HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase) and nucleotides are present in large excess. Therefore, transfering reproducibly within the exponential growth phase is equivalent to selecting for fast growth; those molecules which can replicate faster will displace others after several transfers. The experiments were performed using a serial transfer apparatus (STA) which allows the nucleic acid concentration to be monitored on-line by measuring the laser-induced fluorescence caused by intercalation of thiazole orange monomers into the RNA/DNA amplification products. The serial transfer experiments were carried out with an RNA template (220b RNA) that represents a 220-base segment of the HIV-1 genome and comprises the in vivo primer binding site (PBS) for the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. It could be shown that after only two serial transfers two RNA species (EP1 and EP2) emerged that were much shorter. EP1 (48b) and EP2 (54b) were formed by deletion mutations within the original 220b RNA template in the very beginning of the serial transfer experiment; due to their higher replication rate (calculated from the growth curves derived on-line) these two deletion mutants displaced the original 220b RNA template in the course of the following thirty transfers. We assume that these two RNA species evolved independently of each other. Their formation was probably induced by a strand-transfer reaction of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Sequence analyses of these two evolution products seem to confirm such a presented pathway. 30 years after Spiegelman's experiment, the study described here is another answer to the question he posed: ‘How do molecules evolve if the only demand is the biblical injunction: multiply?’. The answer, derived from a modified 3SR amplification system (mimicking a part of the HIV-1 replication cycle in vitro), is the same as thirty years ago: The RNA molecules adapt to the new conditions by throwing away any ballast not needed for fast replication. Clearly, this is only one aspect of molecular evolution; however, it shows that we should be careful in designating unidentified genetic material as ‘junk DNA’.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gilbert, W.: 1985, ‘Genes-in-pieces revisited’, Science 228, 823–824.
Cochet, M., Gannon, F., Hen, R., Maroteaux, L., Perrin, F. and Chambon, P.: 1976, ‘Organisation and sequence studies of the 17-piece chicken conalbumin gene’, Nature 282, 567–574.
Craik, C. S., Rutter, W. J. and Fletterick, R.: 1983, ‘Splice junctions: association with variation in protein structure’, Science 220, 1125–1129.
Padgett, R. A., Grabowski, P. J., Konarska, M. M. Seiler, S. and Sharp, P. A.: 1986, ‘Splicing of messenger RNA precursors’, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55, 1119.
Lazzarini, R. A., Keene, J. D. and Schubert, M.: 1981, ‘The origin of defective interfering particles of the negative-strand RNA viruses’, Cell 26, 145–154.
Huang, A. S. and Baltimore, D.: 1970, ‘Defective viral particles and viral disease processes’, Nature 226, 325.
Sharp, P. A.: 1985, ‘On the origin of RNA splicing and introns’, Cell 42, 397–400.
Nayak, D. P.: 1980, ‘Defective interfering influenza viruses’, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 619–644.
Kirkwood, T. B. and Bangham, C. R. M.: 1994, ‘Cycles, chaos and evolution in virus cultures: A model of defective interfering particles’, Proc. Nac. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8685–8689.
Mills, D. R., Peterson, R. L. and Spiegelman, S.: 1967, ‘An extracellular darwinian experiment with a self-duplicating nucleic acid molecule’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 54, 919–927.
Walter, N. G. and Strunk, G.: 1994, ‘Strand displacement amplification as an in vitro model for rolling-circle replication: Deletion formation and evolution during serial transfer’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7937–7941.
Breaker, R. R. and Joyce, G.: 1994, ‘Emergence of a replicating species from an in vitro RNA evolution reaction’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6093–6097.
Gebinoga, M. and Oehlenschläger, F.: 1995, ‘Comparison of self-sustained sequence replication reaction systems’, Eur. J. Biochem. 235, 256–261.
Fahy, E., Kwoh, D. Y. and Gingeras, T. R.: 1991, ‘Self-sustained sequence replication (3SR): An isothermal transcription-based amplification system alternative to PCR’, PCRMethods Appl. 1, 25–33.
Eigen, M.: 1986, ‘The physics of evolution’, Chem. Scr. 26, 13–26.
Strunk, G.: 1993, ‘Automatisierte Evolutionsexperimente in vitro und natürliche Evolution unter kontrollierten Bedingungen mit Hilfe der Serial-Transfer-Technik’, Verlag Shaker, Aachen, Germany.
Otten, H.: 1988, ‘Ein Beitrag zur Durchf¨uhrung von kontrollierten Evolutionsexperimenten mit biologischen Makromolekülen’, Dissertation, Techn. Univ. Braunschweig, Germany.
Barnett, R. W. and Erfle, H.: 1990, ‘Rapid generation of DNA fragment by PCR amplification of crude, synthetic oligonucleotides’, Nucl. Acid Res. 18, 3094.
Sandhu, G. S., Aleff, R. A. and Kline, B. C.: 1992, ‘Dual asymetric PCR: One-step construction of synthetic genes’, Biothechniques 12, 14–16.
Bauer, J.: 1990, RNA sequencing using fluorescent-labelled dideoxynucleotides and automated fluorescence detection, Nucl. Acid Res. 18, 879–884.
Hofacker, I. L., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., Bonhoeffer, L. S., Tacker, L. and Schuster, P.: 1994,’ Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures’, Chem. Mon. 125, 167–188.
Wu, W., Blumberg, B. M., Fay, P. J. and Bambara, R. A.: 1995, ‘Strand transfer mediated by human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase in vitro is promoted by pausing and results in misincorporation’, J. Biol. Chem. 270, 325–332.
Peliska, J. A. and Benkovic, S. J.: 1992, ‘Mechanism of DNA strand-transfer reactions catalysed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase’, Science 258, 1112–1118.
Kohlstaedt, L. A. and Steitz, T. A.: 1992, ‘Reverse transcriptase of human immunodefficiency virus can use either human tRNALys or E. coli tRNAGln as a primer in an in vitro primer-utilization assay’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9652–9656.
Nelson, G. W. and Perelson, A. S.: 1995, ‘Modeling defective interfering virus therapy for AIDS: conditions for DIV survival’, Math. Biosci. 125, 127–53.
Saffhill, R., Schneider-Bernloehr, H., Orgel, L.E. and Spiegelman, S.: 1970 ‘In vitro selection of Qß ribonucleic acid variants resistant to ethidium bromide’, J. Mol. Biol. 51, 531–539.
Orgel, L.E.: 1979, ‘Selection in vitro’, Proc. Royal Society, London 205, 435–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oehlenschläger, F., Eigen, M. 30 Years Later – a New Approach to Sol Spiegelman's and Leslie Orgel's in vitro EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES Dedicated to Leslie Orgel on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Orig Life Evol Biosph 27, 437–457 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006501326129
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006501326129