Abstract
The importance of consumption in modern societies is constantly growing. To guide consumer oriented policy, a model of consumption is needed which reflects consumers increased significance. The model of consumption prevailing in the theory of market economies as well as in consumer policy was traditionally based upon the notion of consumers sovereignty. This model served both as a description and as the ethical foundation of the market economy. In the first part of this paper, the authors show the need for a new model of consumption by making clear the descriptive and normative shortcomings of consumer sovereignty. In view of the reality of modern societies, it is neither possible nor ethically justifiable to make purchase decisions according to the individual maximization of utility only. The second part presents the idea, the ethical foundation, and the contents of the new model of "sustainable consumption." This model is proposed to serve as a guideline for both responsible consumers and consumer policymakers and for all institutions concerned with the creation of a sustainable development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arndt, J. (1978). How broad should the marketing concept be? Journal of Marketing, 42(1), 101–103.
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. English edition (1992): Risk society – Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1993). Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Bennigsen-Foerder, R. v. (1988). Politisierung des Konsums. Markenartikel, 50,334–339.
Biervert, B. (1993). Konsum, Konsumgesellschaft. In: G. Enderle, K. Homann, M. Honecker, W. Kerber, & H. Steinmann (Eds.), Lexikon der Wirtschaftsethik, pp. 535–545. Freiburg i.B.: Herder.
Bocock, R. (1993). Consumption. London: Routledge.
BUND & Misereor (Eds.) (1996). Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland. Basle: Birkhäuser.
CEP (Council on Economic Priorities) (Eds.) (1994). Shopping for a better world: The quick and easy guide to all your socially responsible shopping. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.
Ekins, P. (1992). A new world order. London: Routledge.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. New York: Crown Publishers.
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom of will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5–20.
Friedman, M. (1996). A positive approach to organized consumer action: The “buycott” as an alternative to the boycott. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 439–451.
Fromm, E. (1976). To have or to be? New York: Harper & Row.
Fullerton, S., Kerch, K. B., & Dodge, H. R. (1996). Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 805–814.
Hansen, U. (1996). Das Informationsrecht des Verbrauchers. In: D. Sadowski, H. Czap, & H. Wächter (Eds.), Regulierung und Unternehmenspolitik, pp. 103–123. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Hansen, U., & Hennig, T. (1995). Der Co-Produzenten-Ansatz im Konsumgüter-marketing. In: U. Hansen (Ed.), Verbraucher-und umweltorientiertes Marketing, pp. 309–331. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
Hansen, U., & Kull, S. (1994). Öko-Label als umweltbezogenes Informationsinstru-ment. Marketing ZFP, 16, 265–274.
Hansen, U., Schoenheit, I., & Devries, J. (1994). Sustainable Consumption und der Bedarf an unternehmensbezogenen Informationen. In: Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten (Eds.), Konsumentenforschung, pp. 227–243. Munich: Vahlen.
Hansen, U., & Stauss, B. (1983). Marketing als marktorientierte Unternehmenspolitik oder als deren integrativer Bestandteil? Marketing ZFP, 5, 77–86.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Homann, K., & Blome-Drees, F. (1992). Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
imug (Ed.) (1997). Unternehmenstest – Neue Herausforderungen für das Management der sozialen und ökologischen Verantwortung. Munich: Vahlen.
imug et al. (Eds.) (1995). Der Unternehmenstester.Die Lebensmittelbranche. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Kant, I. (1964). Groundworks of the metaphysics of morals (originally published in 1785). New York: Harper & Row.
Keat, R., Whiteley, N., & Abercrombie, N. (1994). Introduction. In: R. Keat, N. Whiteley, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The authority of the consumer, pp. 1–19. London: Routledge.
Knobloch, U. (1994). Theorie und Ethik des Konsums. Bern: Haupt.
Kotler, P. (1972). What consumerism means for marketers. Harvard Business Review, 50(3), 48–57.
Kotler, P. (1986). The prosumer movement: A new challenge for marketers. In: R. J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 13), pp. 510–513. Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
Kuby, O. (1983). Qualitatives Wachstum, qualitativer Konsum und die Perspektiven der Verbraucherpolitik. Schriften der Verbraucherverbände, Nr. 16. Bonn: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbraucher e.V.
Machiavelli, N. (1966). Discorsi. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner.
Marcuse, H. (1964). The one-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Meffert, H., & Bruhn, M. (1996). Das Umweltbewußtsein von Konsumenten. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 56, 631–648.
Mises, L. v. (1949). Human action. London: William Hodge.
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.
Nunner-Winkler, G. (1993). Verantwortung. In: G. Enderle, K. Homann, M. Honecker, W. Kerber, & H. Steinmann (Eds.), Lexikon der Wirtschaftsethik, pp. 1185–1192. Freiburg i.B.: Herder.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Preisendörfer, P. (1996). Umweltbewußtsein in Deutschland. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt.
Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1996). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1009–1019.
Scherhorn, G. (1992). Kritik des Zusatznutzens. Thexis, 9(2), 24–28.
Scherhorn, G. (1994). Die Unersättlichkeit der Bedürfnisse und der kalte Stern der Knappheit. In: B. Biervert & M. Held (Eds.), Das Naturverständnis der Ökonomik, pp. 224–240. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
Scherhorn, G., Reisch, L. A., & Raab, G. (1990). Addictive buying in West Germany: An empirical study. Journal of Consumer Policy, 13, 355–387.
Schmidbauer, W. (1996). Der Fortschritt des Konsums und der Rückschritt in die Barbarei. In: Die Verbraucher Initiative (Ed.), Konsumwende – mehr Wohlstand für alle?, pp. 19–31. Bonn: Die Verbraucher Initiative.
Schoenheit, I. (1995). Bedürfnisse und die neue Reflexivität der Konsumkultur. In: D. Steffen (Ed.), Welche Dinge braucht der Mensch?, pp. 206–212. Gießen: Anabas.
Scitovsky, T. (1962). On the principle of consumers' sovereignty. American Economic Review, 52, 262–268.
Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (first edition 1776), edited by R. H. Campbell & A. A. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, N. C. (1990). Morality and the market. London: Routledge.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow.
Ulrich, P. (1993). Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft (3rd ed.). Bern: Haupt.
Verbraucher Initiative (1991). Die Verantwortung der Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher. Bonn: Die Verbraucher Initiative.
Vitell, S.J., & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgements of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 585–597.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wieland, J. (1990): Wirtschaftsethik als Selbstreflexion der Ökonomie. In: P. Ulrich (Ed.), Auf der Suche nach einer modernen Wirtschaftsethik, pp. 147–178. Bern: Haupt.
Winston, G. C. (1982). The timing of economic activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, U., Schrader, U. A Modern Model of Consumption for a Sustainable Society. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 443–468 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006842517219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006842517219