Skip to main content
Log in

On the Perceived Quality of Movies

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address the question of the quality of movies produced between 1950 and 1970. A first outcome of our analysis is that the quality assessments made during the Cannes Festival, and to a lesser degree, by the U.S. Academy are short-lasting. In contrast to this, consumers seem consistent over time. There is, however, one issue on which experts agree as well as consumers: American movies dominate both in terms of commercial success and in terms of quality. There is less agreement, and sometimes there is even dissent concerning other dimensions. This does not come as a surprise and merely indicates that there is hardly a common yardstick along which the quality of a movie can be measured. Therefore, decomposing a work of art into quantifiable characteristics – even in a subjective but possibly unanimous way – would make it possible to explain the divergences between audiences and changes of appreciation over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alion, Y. (1991a) “Le feuilleton du cinéma”. La Revue de Cinéma 471: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alion, Y. (1991b) “—Le feuilleton du cinéma”. La Revue de Cinéma 473: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annual Academy Awards (1998), www.oscar.com/.

  • Budd, M. (1995) Values of Art. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. (1995) “On the Role of Critics in the Culture Industry”. Journal of Cultural Economics 19: 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinémathèque Municipale du Luxembourg (1995) 100 Chefs-d'oeuvre pour un Centenaire. Luxembourg.

  • de Piles, R. (1708) Cours de Peinture par Principes. Paris.

  • de Vany, A. and Walls, W. (1996) “Bose-Einstein Dynamics and Adaptive Contracting in the Motion Picture Industry”. Economic Journal 106: 1493–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vany, A. and Walls, W. (1997) “The Market for Motion Pictures: Rank, Revenue and Survival”. Economic Inquiry 35: 783–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J. and Shugan, S. (1997) “Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors?”. Journal of Marketing 61: 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fédération Internationale des Archives du Film (FIAF) (1995) The Categories Game: A Game for the Cinema Centenary. FIAF' Commission for Programming and Access to Collections, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J.J. and Thisse, J. (1985) “On the Nature of Competition with Differentiated Products”. Economic Journal 96: 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyory, M. and Glas, G. (1992) Statistiques du Cinéma en Europe. Cerica, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, F. (1980) Rediscoveries in Art. Some Aspects of Taste, Fashion and Collecting in England and in France. Phaidon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. and Pieros, A. (1985) “Relationships Among Indicators of Success in Broadway Plays and Motion Pictures”. Journal of Cultural Economics 9: 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, M. (1997) Qu'est-ce que l'Esthétique? Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelsner, Th. (ed.) (1995), Film Klassieker. Vol. 2 and 3, P. Reklam jun., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krider, R. and Weinberg, C. (1998) “Competitive Dynamics and the Introduction of New Products: The Motion Picture Timing Game”. Journal of Marketing Research 35: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1966) “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltin, L. (1997) Movie & Video Guide 1998. Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movie Guide (1997) “Critics Picks: 100 Best Movies of All Time”. www.mr.showbiz.com.

  • Norman, B. (1992) 100 Best Films of the Century. Chapman', London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prag, J. and Cassavant, J. (1994) “An Empirical Study of the Determinants of Revenues and Marketing Expenditures in the Motion Picture Industry”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Ch. (1995) Hollywood Power Stats. Cineview Publ., Valley Village, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1969) On Quality in Art. Phaidon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, M. and Eliashberg, J. (1996) “A Parsimonious Model for Forecasting Gross Box-Office Revenues of Motion Pictures”. Marketing Science 15: 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. and Smith, K. (1986) “Successful Movies: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis”. Applied Economics 18: 501–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swern, P. (1995), The Guiness Book of Box Office Hits. Guiness Publ., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1990) “Perception of Quality in the Demand for Theatre”. Journal of Cultural Economics 14: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscan du Plantier, D. (1997) Cinquante Ans du Festival de Cannes. Editions Ramsey, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulard, J. (1997) Guide des Films. Robert Laffont, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unesco (1970) Film and Cinema Statistics. Unesco, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unesco (1981) Statistics on Film and Cinema 1955–1977. Unesco, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W., Seigerman, A. and Holbrook, M. (1993) “The Role of Actors and Actresses in the Success of Films: How Much is a Movie StarWorth?”. Journal of Cultural Economics 17: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginsburgh, V., Weyers, S. On the Perceived Quality of Movies. Journal of Cultural Economics 23, 269–283 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007596132711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007596132711

Navigation