Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenging the boundaries of local and scientific knowledge in Australia: Opportunities for social learning in managing temperate upland pastures

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence of an emerging focus on the role of farmer knowledge in developed countries is highlighted by the debate on the nature of local and scientific knowledge. Less attention has been paid to the interaction of different ways of knowing for sustainable capital-intensive agriculture. This paper explores the relationship between local and scientific knowledge in managing temperate pasture and grazing systems in Australia. The nature of farmer knowledge is firstly examined by describing the experiences of farm families in managing native and introduced perennial grasses in upland areas of the Murray-Darling Basin. The building of knowledge and skills through social learning was explored in group case studies and interviews with stakeholders involved in pasture research and development. The interchange of local and scientific knowledge in groups was shown to have a synergistic effect, whereby local knowledge was broadened and strengthened, and scientific knowledge adapted and molded to specific situations. The effectiveness of social learning was greatest in collaborative programs based on small, local groups involved in monitoring and evaluation of whole farm pasture and grazing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995). “Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments,” Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 3(3): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. and J. Cary (1992). Greening a Brown Land. Melbourne: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, G. M., W. Dissanayake, and S. Konoshima (eds.) (1986). Knowledge Generation, Exchange and Utilization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1994). Landcare: Communities Shaping the Land and the Future. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1993). “Methods for analysis by farmers: The professional challenge,” Journal for Farming Systems Research-Extension 4(1): 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997), Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp (eds.) (1989). Farmer First: Farmer Participation in Agricultural Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, A. and T. De Lacy (1996). “Landcare in Australia: beyond the expert farmer,” Agriculture and Human Values 13(1): 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T., L. Humphreys, W. Muirhead, M. Plunkett, N. Croker, and M. Nickl (1996). “Changing paradigms for farmer-researcher-extensionist relationships: Exploring methods and theories of farmer participation in research,” European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 3(3): 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1995). “Local knowledge of dryland salinity in the Hunter Valley, Australia,” Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 3(1): 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garden, D., C. Jones, D. Friend, M. Mitchell, and P. Fairbrother (1996). “Regional research on native grass-based pastures,” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39(4): 471–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. (1997). “Networking knowledge in the sustainable agriculture movement: Some implications of the gender dimension,” Society and Natural Resources 10: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. and J. R. Kloppenburg (1995). “Where the grass grows again: Knowledge exchange in the sustainable agriculture movement,” Rural Sociology 60(4): 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, B. (1996). Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 4(1): 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor (1996). Volume 4(1) April issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J. (1993). “From technology transfer to resource development,” in M. J. Baker (ed.), Grasslands for Our World (pp. 184–191). New Zealand: SIR Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1996). “Pastoral value and production from native pastures,” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39(4): 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, S. M. and R. L. Ison (1994). “Diversity in yearly calendars on pastoral properties in western New South Wales: a constructivist perspective,” The Rangeland Journal 16: 206–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1991). “Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture,” Rural Sociology 56: 519–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., N. Long, and M. Villarreal (1990). “Equivocations on knowledge systems theory: an actor-oriented critique,” Knowledge in Society, The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer 3(3): 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and A. Long. (eds.) (1992). Battlefields of Knowledge. The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F. (1996). “How farmers research and learn. The case of arable farmers of East Anglia, UK,” Agriculture and Human Values 13(4): 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. and A. Curtis (1997a). “Perennial grasses: Finding the balance,” Australian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 10(1): 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. and A. Curtis (1997b). “Moving farmer knowledge beyond the farm gate: An Australian study of farmer knowledge in group learning,” European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 4(2): 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J., A. Curtis, and T. De Lacy (1997). “Perennial grasses in Australia: The place for local knowledge,” Rangelands 19(2): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moock, J. L. and R. E. Rhoades (eds.) (1992). Diversity, Farmer Knowledge and Sustainability. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, J. (1994). “Agriculture: Is the Art de la Localite back? The role and function of indigenous knowledge in rural communities,” in J. B. Dent and M. J. McGregor (eds.), Rural Farming Systems Analysis: European Perspectives (pp. 269–279). Oxon, UK: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N. (1997). “Changes in agriculture and rural communities. Emergent challenges for extension,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Australasia-Pacific Extension Conference (pp. 1–24). Albury, NSW: Australasia-Pacific Extension Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N. and R. Chambers (1994). “Towards a learning paradigm: new professionalism and institutions for a sustainable agriculture,” in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds.), Beyond Farmer First. Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice (pp. 182–202). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke, A. H. and J. Sanford Rikoon (1997). “Temporal and spatial dimensions of knowledge: Implications for sustainable agriculture,” Agriculture and Human Values 14: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, C., B. Haverkort, and A. Waters-Bayer (1992). Farming for the Future. An Introduction to Low-external-input and Sustainable Agriculture. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, R. E. (1984). Breaking New Ground. Agricultural Anthropology. Lima, Peru: International Potato Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1994). “Interaction between extension services and farmer decision making: New issues and sustainable farming,” in J. B. Dent and M. J. McGregor (eds.), Rural Farming Systems Analysis: European Perspectives (pp. 280–291). Oxon, UK: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. and J. Thompson (eds.) (1994). Beyond Farmer First. Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. and I. Scoones (1994). “Challenging the populist perspective: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice,” Agriculture and Human Values 11(2/3): 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A. (1989). “Legitimizing local knowledge: from displacement to empowerment for Third World people,” Agriculture and Human Values 6: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. M., L. Jan Slikkerveer, and S. Oguntunji Titilola (eds.) (1989). Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development. Studies in technology and social change series. No. 11. Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millar, J., Curtis, A. Challenging the boundaries of local and scientific knowledge in Australia: Opportunities for social learning in managing temperate upland pastures. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 389–399 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007695516492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007695516492

Navigation