Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plants, small mammals, and the hierarchical landscape classifications of Patagonia

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assemblages of plants were studied at 14 sites in northern Patagonia corresponding to localities at which we (Monjeau et al. 1997) earlier studied the relationship between small mammal assemblages and landscape classifications. This allowed us to test predictions that both plants and small mammals correspond to the more inclusive hierarchical landscape divisions but that plants track better than small mammals the less inclusive divisions. Species presence or absence of plants at each locality was used in a series of multivariate analyses and compared by correlation analysis with those generated from small mammal species data. Assemblages of both plants and small mammals corresponded to the upper divisions, which are based on climatic and geomorphological features, but small mammal assemblages did not correspond to the lower divisions of the landscape classifications. Three factors are considered as explanations for the observed differences between plants and small mammals: a) small mammal habitat is determined more by plant growth form than by plant species; b) trophic level differences between the two groups; and c) species pool size affects the resolution of microhabitat correspondence. Our data indicate that both plant assemblages and small mammal assemblages respond to climatic and geomorphological features, which is in contrast to the paradigm that mammal assemblages simply follow plant assemblages. We also attempted to reconcile classification systems in Patagonia by proposing a nomenclatural system based on a hierarchical classification. In the system proposed, ecoregion is the lowest division small mammal assemblages can recognize in Patagonia. Finally, we conclude that the hierarchical nature of landscapes based on a holistic view of environments reflects real entities that are not just the perceptions of landscape ecologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguiar, M.R., Paruelo, J.M., Golluscio, R.A., León, R.J.C., Burkart, S.E. and Pujol G. 1988. The heterogeneity of the vegetation in arid and semiarid Patagonia: an analysis using AVHRR/NOAA satellite imagery. Annali di Botanica 46: 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R.G. 1987. Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale ecosystem mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeskow, A.M., Beltramonte, C. and del Valle, H.F. 1982. Relevamiento fisiográfico expeditivo de la meseta de Somuncurá. Contribuciones del Centro Nacional Patagónico 66: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertiller, M.B. and Beeskow, A.M. 1981. Las unidades florístico-fisonómicas de la vegetación de la Península Valdés y sus alrededores. pp. 10–11. VII Reunión Argentina de Ecología.

  • Bertiller, M.B., Elissalde, N.O., Rostagno, C.M. and Defosse, G.E. 1995. Environmental patterns and plant distribution along a precipitation gradient in western Patagonia. Journal of Arid Environments 29: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, E.C., Grant, W.E. and Baird, D.D. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of Microtus populations. Ecology 57: 1043–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, E.C., Monjeau, J.A., Phillips, C.J., Sikes, R.S. and Kim, I. 1996. Lestodelphys halli: new information on a poorly known Argentine marsupial. Mastozoología Neotropical 3: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, A., Hay, S., Bergeron, Y. and Leduc, A. 1991. The vascular flora of Gros Morne National Park, Newfoundland: a habitat classification approach based on floristic, biogeographical and life-form data. In Quantitative Approaches to Phytogeography. pp. 123–157. Edited by P.L. Nimis and T.J. Crovello. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, E.O. 1981 Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables. Vegetatio 45: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, E.O., Holben, B.N. and Kalb, V. 1989. Accuracy of the AVHRR Vegetation Index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux. Vegetatio 80: 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bran, D. 1992. Las regiones ecológicas de la Patagonia y sus principales formaciones vegetales. Comunicación Técnica INTA 3: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A.L. 1969. Compuestas nuevas de la Patagonia. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 11: 271.

  • Cabrera, A.L. 1971. Fitogeografía de la RepÚblica Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 14: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, S.A. 1944. Foundations of Plant Geography. Harper, New York.

  • Cei, J.M. 1969. The Patagonian telmatobiid fauna of the volcanic Somuncurá Plateau. Journal of Herpetology 3: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cei, J.M. 1985. Notas sobre especies de Liolaemus de la meseta de Somuncurá, Río Negro y rectificación de los géneros Liolaemus kingi somuncurae. Boletin de la Asociación Herpetológica Argentina 1: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F.E. and Shelford, V.E. 1939. Bio-Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, M.N. 1969. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte II. Monocotyledonae (excepto Graminae). Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Correa, M.N. 1971. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte VII. Compositae. Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Correa, M.N. 1978. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte III. Graminae. Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Correa, M.N. 1984a. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte IVa. Dicotyledoneas dialipétalas (Salicaceas a Crucíferas). Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Correa, M.N. 1984b. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte IVb. Dycotiledoneas dialipétalas (Droseaceae a Leguminosae). Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Correa, M.N. 1988. Flora Patagónica (RepÚblica Argentina). Tomo VIII Parte V. Dycotiledoneas dialipétalas (Oxalidaceae a Cornaceae). Colección Científica Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • Crespo, J.A. 1963. Dispersión del chinchillón, Lagidium viscacia (Molina) en el Noroeste de Patagonia y descripción de una nueva subespecie (Mammalia, Rodentia), Lagidium viscacia somuncurensis. Neotropica 9: 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, K.L. 1962. Reduced interspecific competition among the birds of Bermuda. Ecology 43: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, T.L. 1982. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. The Coleopterologists Bulletin 36: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, T.L. 1983. Beetles and other insects of tropical canopies at Manaus, Brazil. In Tropical Rain Forest. pp. 59–75. Edited by S.C Sutton, T.C. Whitmore and A.C. Chadwick, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, J.M., Rumbol, M., Canevari, M., Canevari, P. and Vasina, W.G. 1983. Animals. In Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. pp. 454–457. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, W.E. 1977. Comparative ecology of small mammal communities in California and Chile. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golluscio, R.A., León, R.J.C. and Perelman, S.B. 1982. Caracterización fitosociológica de la estepa del Oeste de Chubut. Su relación con el gradiente ambiental. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 21: 299–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr, G. and Kojima, S. 1993. Vegetation diversity and classi-fication systems. In Vegetation Dynamics & Global Change. pp. 218–232. Edited by A.M. Solomon and H. Shugart. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W.E. and Birney, E.C. 1979. Small mammal community structure in North American grasslands. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.S. and di Castri, F. (eds.) 1992. Landscape Boundaries: Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flow. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge, L.R. 1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105: 367–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.M. and Risser, P.G. 1991. Introduction: The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. In Ecotones: The Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. pp 1–7. Edited by M.M. Holland, P.G. Risser and R.J. Naiman. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.M., Risser, P.G. and. Naiman, R.J. (eds.) 1991. Ecotones: The Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. Chapman and Hall. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 1972. Computational methods in the study of plant distributions. In Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Evolution. pp. 381–393. Edited by D.H. Valentine. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobággy, E.G., Paruelo, J.M. and León, R.J.C. 1996. Vegetation heterogeneity and diversity in flat and mountain landscapes of Patagonia (Argentina). Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 599–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R.H.G., Ter Braak, C.J.F. and van Tongeren, O.F.R. (eds.) 1987. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelt, D.A., Meserve, P.L. and Lang, B.K. 1994. Quantitative habitat associations of small mammals in a temperate rainforest in southern Chile: empirical patterns and the importance of ecological scale. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 890–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, F. and Udo de Haes, H.A. 1994. A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implications for ecological land classification. Landscape Ecology 9: 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapovickas, A. 1969. Una nueva especie de Lecanophora, Speg. (Malvaceae). Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Universidad Nacional de Cuyo 15: 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lores, M. 1982. Ordenamiento y clasificación de comunidades en la región oriental de la Meseta de Somuncurá (Pcia de Río Negro). Memoria Técnica, INTA EEA Bariloche 5: 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozada, M., Monjeau, J.A., Heinemann, K.M, Guthmann, N. and Birney, E.C. 1996. Abrothrix xanthorhinus. Mammalian Species 540: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H., Recher, H. and Cody, M. 1966. On the relation between habitat selection and species diversity. American Naturalist 100: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, J.A. 1976. Species and guild similarity of North American desert mammal faunas: a functional analysis of communities. In Evolution of Desert Biota. pp. 133–148. Edited by D.W. Goodall. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcolín, A. and Vallerini, J.A. 1983. Soils. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 435–440. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateucci, S. D. and Colma, A. 1982. Metodología para el Estudio de la Vegetación. Organization of American States, No. 22, Washington, D.C.

  • Menni, R.C. and Gomez, S.E. 1995. On the habitat and isolation of Gymnocharacinus bergi (Osteichthyes: Characidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 42: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C.H. 1890. Results of a biological survey of the San Francisco Mountain region and desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona. North American Fauna 3: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C.H. 1894. Laws of temperature control of the geographic distribution of terrestrial animals and plants. National Geographic Magazine 6: 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meserve, P.L. 1981a. Resource partitioning in a Chilean semi-arid small mammal community. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 745–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meserve, P.L. 1981b. Trophic relationships among small mammals in a Chilean semiarid thorn scrub community. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meserve, P.L. and Glanz, W.E. 1978. Geographical ecology of small mammals in the northern Chilean arid zone. Journal of Biogeography 5: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjeau, J.A. 1989. Ecología y distribución geográfica de los pequeños mamíferos del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi y áreas adyacentes. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjeau, J.A., Bonino, N. and Saba, S. 1994. Annotated checklist of the living land mammals in Patagonia, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 1: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjeau, J.A., Sikes R.S., Birney E.C, Guthmann N. and. Phillips C.J. (1997). Small mammal community composition within the major landscape divisions of Patagonia, southern Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 4: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W. and Knight, T.W. 1996. Can consumer-resource dynamics explain patterns of guild assembly?. The American Naturalist 147: 558–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, S.R., Brown, J.H., Kelt, D.A and Reid, J.R. 1994. Comparison of community structure among small mammals of North American and Australian deserts. Australian Journal of Zoology 42: 501–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movia, C.P. 1983. Erosion forms and processes. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 438–440. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, V.I. 1983. Remote sensing application in agriculture. In Manual of Remote Sensing, Vol. II. Interpretations and Applications. Chapter 33. Edited by R.N. Colwell. American Society of Photogrammetry.

  • Naimann, R.J., Décamps, H., Pastor, J., and Johnston, C.A. 1988. The potential importance of boundaries to fluvial ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, R.R. and MacMahon, J.A. 1983. Factors determining the abundance and distribution of rodents in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: the role of shrubs. Oecologia 59: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo, J.M., Aguiar, M.R., León, R.J.C., Golluscio, R.A. and Batista, W.B. 1991. The use of satellite imagery in quantitative phytogeography: a case study of Patagonia (Argentina). In Quantitative Approaches to Phytogeography. pp. 183–204. Edited by P.L. Nimis and T.J. Crovello. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, B.D., Meserve, P.L. and Lang, B.K. 1989. Distribution and abundance of small mammals along an elevational transect in temperate rainforest of Chile. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, B.D., Meserve, P.L. and Lang, B.K. 1990. Quantitative habitat association of small mammals along an elevational transect in temperate rainforest of Chile. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 620–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O.P. and Pearson, A.K. 1982. Ecology and biogeography of the southern rainforest of Argentina. In Mammalian Biology in South America. pp. 129–142. Edited by M.A. Mares and H.H. Genoways. Special Publication Series 6, Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Prohaska, F. 1976. The climate of Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. In World Survey of Climatology, Vol. 12: Climates of Central and South America. pp. 13–112. Edited byW. Schwerdtfeger. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, E.H. 1982. Areography: Geographical Strategies of the Species. Pergamon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J., Kishpaugh, J. and Kirk, D. 1982. NT-SYS. Numerical taxonomy system of multivariate statistical program. State University, New York, Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.S. 1961. The level of integration concept and ecology. Ecology 42: 420–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Leal, A. 1972. Los confines boreal y austral de las Provincias Patagónica y Central respectivamente. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 13: 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6. Cary, North Carolina.

  • Schultz, A.M. 1967. The ecosystem as a conceptual tool in the management of natural resources. In Natural Resources: Quality and Quantity. Edited by S.V. Ciriacy-Wantrup and J.J. Parsons. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A. 1949. El límite entre las provincias botánicas Patagónica y Central en el territorio del Chubut. Lilloa 20: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A. 1956. Los distritos florísticos de la Provincia Patagónica. Revista de Investigaciones Agrícolas 10: 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A. 1983. Deserts and semi-deserts of Patagonia. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 423–459. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A., Movia, C.P. and León, R. 1983. Vegetation of Patagonia. In Temperate deserts and semi-deserts. pp. 440–454. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, A. and Paruelo, J.M. 1992. Biozones: vegetation units defined by functional characters identifiable with the aid of satellite sensor images. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 2: 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Prentice, I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 271–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1982. Resource partitioning and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology. A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. Bioscience 37: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Valle, H.F., Labraga, J.C. and Goergen, J. 1995. Biozonas de la Región Patagónica. In Evaluación del Estado Actual de la Desertificación en Areas Representativas de la Patagonia: Informe Final de la etapa I. pp. 37–55. Edited by INTA-GTZ, Río Gallegos-Trelew-Puerto Madryn-Bariloche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkheimer, W. 1983a. Geology of extra-Andean Patagonia. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 425–429. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkheimer, W. 1983b. Aspects of vegetational history. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 429–430. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkheimer, W. 1983c. Paleoclimates. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 430–432. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. and Box, E.O. 1983. Climate of Patagonia. In Temperate Deserts and Semi-deserts. pp. 432–435. Edited by N.E. West. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Crawford, C.S. and Gosz, J.R. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. W. W. Norton & Co. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I.S. 1989. The land unit – A fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications. Landscape Ecology 3: 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bell Museum of Natural History and Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, St. Paul, MN, 55108

    J. Adrian Monjeau, Elmer C. Birney & Robert S. Sikes

  2. Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CC. 1336, Bariloche, Río, Negro, Argentina

    J. Adrian Monjeau, Luciana Ghermandi & Laura Margutti

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, 61761, USA

    Carleton J. Phillips

Authors
  1. J. Adrian Monjeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elmer C. Birney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luciana Ghermandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert S. Sikes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura Margutti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carleton J. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monjeau, J.A., Birney, E.C., Ghermandi, L. et al. Plants, small mammals, and the hierarchical landscape classifications of Patagonia. Landscape Ecology 13, 285–306 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008012613305

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008012613305

Search

Navigation