Skip to main content
Log in

Applying Diffusion Models with Regional Heterogeneity

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies of innovation diffusion have investigated cross-country heterogeneity, but implicitly assumed within-country homogeneity. As such, these studies potentially overlook within-country variations in diffusion patterns, which may be even more important to marketing managers and researchers alike. The current paper is concerned with such intra-country variations using one of many possible a priori segmentation schemes, namely geographic segmentation. It empirically demonstrates that when substantial regional variations in diffusion patterns occur, taking account of these regional differences improves both short- and long-term forecasting under certain conditions. Regional differences in diffusion patterns also provide some important normative implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

5. References

  • Bass, F.M. (1969). “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,” Management Science 15(5) (January), 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M., T.V. Krishnan and D.C. Jain. (1994). “Why the Bass Model Fits Without Decision Variables,” Marketing Science 13(3) (Summer), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A.P. and U.A. Lavaraj. (1987). “Innovation Diffusion in a Heterogeneous Population,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 32, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsky, D. and L.S. Simon. (1983). “Advertising and the Diffusion of New Products,” Marketing Science 2(1) (Winter), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D.C. and R.C. Rao. (1990). “Effect of Price on the Demand for Durables: Modeling, Estimation and Findings,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 8(2) (April), 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, S. (1983). “Monopolist Pricing with Dynamic Demand and Production Cost,” Marketing Science 2(2) (Spring), 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W.A. and S.K. Balasubramanian. (1988). “Long-Term View of the Diffusion of Durables: A Study of the Role of Price and Adoption Influence Processes Via Tests of Nested Models,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., A.G. Rao, and S. Kalish. (1981). “Bayesian Estimation and Control of Detailing Effort in a Repeat Purchase Diffusion Environment,” Management Science 27(5) (May), 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., E. Muller and F.M. Bass. (1993). “New Product Diffusion Models,” In J. Eliashberg and G.L. Lilien (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 5: Marketing (349–408). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V. and R.A. Peterson. (1979). “Integrating Time and Space in Technological Substitution Models,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 14, 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.A. and F.M. Bass. (1987). “A Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of High-Technology Products,” Management Science 33(9) (September), 1069–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P.M. (1994). “Aggregate Diffusion Forecasting Models in Marketing: A Critical Review,” International Journal of Forecasting 10, 353–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B. and C. Lakhani. (1975). “Dynamic Price Models for New Product Planning,” Management Science 10 (June), 1113–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., and C.H. Mason. (1986). “Nonlinear Least Squares Estimation of New Product Diffusion Models,” Marketing Science 5, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerahandi, S. and S.R. Dalal. (1992). “A Choice-Based Approach to the Diffusion of a Service: Forecasting Fax Penetration by Market Segments,” Marketing Science 11(1) (Winter), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steffens, P. Applying Diffusion Models with Regional Heterogeneity. Marketing Letters 9, 361–369 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008041517592

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008041517592

Navigation