Abstract
The understanding of how people evaluate and respond to natural hazards in an urban area, and how this knowledge can be integrated in the planning and management process, are becoming very important elements of a comprehensive and participatory approach to flood hazard management. Such an approach demands a clear comprehension of the processes of the risks perception, causal attribution, possible solutions for the problem and patterns of behaviour developed during hazard situations. The willingness of the public to participate in flood management, and the attitudes to previous initiatives also need to be addressed. The provision of structural flood defences can have a major impact on the environment and there has been an expression of concern by many members of the public for the degradation of river corridors. In this context, it is becoming a commonly accepted practice by central or local governments to submit flood management plans to public discussion. Appropriate techniques for interfacing with the public are necessary to support this upsurge of public involvement. This paper presents results from research on public perception of floods, flood management and participatory initiatives in Setúbal, Portugal. An extensive interview programme was undertaken with residents and shopkeepers – with and without flood experience, professionals responsible for dealing with flood control problems and local authorities responsible for decision-making on flood management. The paper concludes with a number of recommendations for flood hazard management policy making and processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernardo, F., Ramos, I., Saraiva, M.G. and Correia, F.N.: 1993, Sistemas de Informação Geográfica no Ordenamento de Áreas de Risco de Cheias, Caso de SetÚbal, II ESIG, Estoril.
Burby, R. J. and French, S. P.: 1981, Coping with floods. The land use management paradox. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 47(3), 289-300.
Correia, F. N., Saraiva, M. G., Rocha J., Fordham M., Bernardo F., Ramos I., Marques Z. and Soczka L.: 1994, The Planning of Flood Alleviation Measures: Interface with the Public in: Penning-Rowsell, E., M. Fordham (ed.), 1994, Floods Across Europe: Flood Hazard Assessment, Modelling and Management, Middlesex University Press, London.
Correia, F. N., Saraiva, M. G., Rocha, J., Bernardo, F. and Ramos, I.: 1995, Public Perception on Flood Risk and Flood Defence Policies, in: Gardiner et al. (1995) Defence from Floods and Floodplain Management, NATO ASI Series Vol. 299, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Correia, F. N., Saraiva, M. G., Soczka, L. and Soeiro, C.: 1990, Public Perceptions and Public Participation in Water Projects, Colloque Europeen La Gestion de L’Eau, Paris.
Correia, F. N., Saraiva, M. G. and Ramos, I.: 1997a, GIS-Based Flood Analysis and Floodplain Management. Submited to publication in Water Resour. Manage., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Correia, F. N., Rego, F., Saraiva, M. G. and Ramos, I.: 1997b, Coupling GIS with Hydrologic and Hydraulic Flood Modelling, submitted to publication in Water Resour. Manage., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Correia, F. N., Saraiva, M. G. and Silva, F. N.: 1997c, Floodplain Management in Urban Developing Areas, submitted to publication in Water Resour. Manage., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Fordham, M. H.: 1992, Choice and Constraint in Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Environmental Attitudes of Floodplain Residents and Engineers, PhD Thesis, Middlesex University.
Fordham, M.: 1993, Valuing the Environment: the attitudes of floodplain residents and flood defence engineers. In Values and the Environment: Conference Proceedings, 23-24 September, University of Surrey.
Fordham, M., Tunstall, S. and Penning-Rowsell, E.C.: 1991, Choice and preference in the Thames floodplain: the beginnings of a participatory approach? Landscape and Urban Planning, 20, 183-187.
Gardiner, J. L.: 1988, Environmentally sensitive river engineering: examples from the Thames catchment, in: Petts, G. (ed.). Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, Vol. 2, John Wiley and Sons.
Green, C. H., Tunstell, S.M. and Fordham, M.: 1991, The Risks from Flooding: which Risks and whose Perceptions, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex Polytechnic, Enfield.
Keeney, R. L. and Winterfeld, D.V.: 1986, Improving Risk Communication, Risk Anal. 6.
Kouzmin, A.: 1992, Creeping Crises and Expert Systems: Planning for environmental disaster capabilities, Resource and Environmental Studies Number 6, Centre for Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
Laska, S.B.: 1990, Homeowner Adaptation to Flooding: an Application of the General Hazards Coping Theory, Environ. Behav. 23(3), Sage Publications.
Lave, T. R. and Lave, L.B.: 1991, Public Perception of the Risks of Floods: Implications for Communication, Risk Anal. II(2).
Lima, L. and Faísca, L.: 1992, O Ajustamento às Cheias: estudo exploratório na População Portuguesa,Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa.
Lima, M. L.: 1993, Percepção de Riscos Ambientais: Representações e Identidades Sociais, Comunicação no I Colóquio de ‘Ambiente: Psicologia, Educação e Política Ambientais ,ISPA, Lisboa.
Litton, R. B. et al.: 1974, Water and Landscape. An Aesthetic Overview of the Role of Water in the Landscape, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of California, Water Information Center Inc., New York.
Moore, H. E.: 1964, And the Winds Blew, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.
Penning-Rowsell, E. (ed.): 1996, Improving Flood Hazard Management Across Europe, Middlesex University Press, London.
Penning-Rowsell, E., Fordham, M. (eds): 1994, Floods across Europe. Flood Hazard Assessment, Modelling and Management, Middlesex University Press, London.
Ramos, I.: 1992, As Quintas Envolventes de SetÚbal. Uma Proposta de Ordenamento, Final Report of the Degree of Landscape Architecure, I.S.A., Lisboa.
Rejeski, D.: 1993, GIS and Risk: a Three-Culture Problem, Environmental Modeling with GIS, Oxford University, New York.
Rochford, E. B. and Blocker, T. J.: 1991, Coping with ‘Natural’ Hazards as Stressor. The Predictor of Activism in a Flood Disaster, Environ. Behav. 23(2), Sage Publications.
Saraiva, M. G.: 1995, O Rio como Paisagem. Gestão de Corredores Fluviais no quadro do Ordenamento do Território, (The river as landscape: management of river corridors in the framework of land-use planning), Ph. D. Dissertation, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.
Slovic: 1986, Informing and Educating the Public about Risk, Risk Analysis 6.
Smith, K. and Tobin, G. A.: 1979, Human Adjustment to the Flood Hazard, London: Longman.
Wenger, D. E.: 1978, Community Response to Disaster: Functional and Structural Alterations, in: E. L. Quarantelli (ed.), Disasters, Theory and Research, Sage Publication Inc., Beverly Hills, California, U.S.A.
White, G. F.: 1973, Natural Hazards Research, in: Chorley, R.J. (ed.), Directions in Geography, Methuen, London.
Wood, D., Gooch, T. C., Pronovost, P. M. and Noonan, D. C.: 1985, Development of a flood management plan, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage 111(4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
nunes Correia, F., Fordham, M., da GRAča Saraiva, M. et al. Flood Hazard Assessment and Management: Interface with the Public. Water Resources Management 12, 209–227 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008092302962
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008092302962