Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the Performance of Real-Time Systems

  • Published:
Real-Time Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

So far, performance measures for real time systems did not receive much attention. An assessment of the few existing benchmarking methods for real time systems will reveal that they are highly inappropriate. Taking a closer look into the fundamental issues of real time systems it will become clear, that for hard real time systems qualitative characteristics are much more important than quantitative measures. The major qualitative performance criteria are compiled. Systems fulfiling the qualitative aspects may then be compared on the basis of costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ada performance issues. Ada Letters (1990). SIGAda. ACM Press, 10(3), Winter 1990.

  • atp-Gespräch: Leistungstest für Prozeßrechner nach DIN 19 242. Automatisierungstechnische Praxis atp 31, Heft 6. R., 1990.

  • Behnsen, S. Betriebsystem für Embedded Applikationen: Minimierter Echtzeit-Posix-Kernel. Systeme, June 1996.

  • Brodarac, D. Was leistet ein Low-Cost-Personal-Computer im Vergleich zu einer microVAX II. Automatisierungstechnische Praxis atp 31, Heft 5. R., 1989.

  • DIN 19 242 Teil 1 - Teil 14: Leistungstest von Prozeßrechensystemen: Zeitmessungen, January 1987.

  • DIN 19 243 Teil 1 - Teil 4: Grundfunktionen der prozeßrechnergestüzten Automatisierung, January 1987.

  • DIN 44 300 Informationsverarbeitung No. 9.2.11, 1985.

  • DIN 66 273 Teil 1: Messung und Bewertung der Leistung von DV-Systemen, March 1987.

  • Kar, R. P. Implementing the Rhealstone real time benchmark, where a proposal's rubber meets the real time road. Dr. Dobb's Journal, April 1990.

  • Kar, R. P., and Porter, K. Rhealstone, a real time benchmark proposal; an independently verifiable metric for complex multitaskers. Dr. Dobb's Journal, February 1989.

  • Kasten, G., Howard, D., and Walsh, B. Rhealstone recommendations. Dr. Dobb's Journal, September 1990.

  • Leung, C. H. C. Quantitative analysis of computer systems, 1988.

  • Price, W. J. A benchmark tutorial. IEEE Micro 5:28–43.

  • Southerton, A. The performance measurement contest. UNIX World, March 1990.

  • Stankovic, J. A. Misconceptions about real-time computing. IEEE Computer 10–19, October 1988.

  • Swoyer, T. 1994. Balancing responsiveness, I/O throughput, and computation. Real-Time Magazine 1:73–78, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhle, M. Leistungstest für Prozeßrechner nach DIN 19 242. Automatisierungstechnische Praxis atp 31 Heft 5. R., 1989.

  • VDI/VDE 3552-3553: Leistungskriterien von Prozeßrechensystemen.

  • Vose, G. M., and Weil, D. A benchmark apologia, credible benchmarks are often the exception rather than the rule. Dr. Dobb's Journal, February 1989.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halang, W.A., Gumzej, R., Colnaric, M. et al. Measuring the Performance of Real-Time Systems. Real-Time Systems 18, 59–68 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102611034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102611034

Navigation