Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Market Solutions into Government Flood Control Policies

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potentially useful market solutions to minimize flood damageinclude purchase of space in existing reservoirs, purchase offlooding rights from farmers and other land owners, and privately produced levees to protect housing and commercialdevelopment. These private solutions are often limited by risk considerations, free riders, and the transactions costsassociated with large groups, necessitating public sector provision of flood control measures. Thus, most market participants will be public entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Diringer: 1997, San Francisco Chronicle, March 3.

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency: 1985, Reducing Losses In High Risk Flood Hazard Areas: A Guidebook for Local Officials.

  • Hershleifer, J.: 1983, ‘From Weakest-Link to Best Shot: The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods’, Public Choice 41(3), pp. 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee: 1994, Sharing the Challenge: Floodplain Management into the 21st Century, Washington, D. C., U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, R.: 1989, Battling the Inland Sea: American Popular Culture, Public Policy, and the Sacramento Valley, 1850- 1986, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V. and Eckstein, O.: 1969, Multiple Purpose River Basin Development, Resources for the Future, Inc., Johns-Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1995, Flood Risk Management and the American River Basin, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. bibitem Sandler, T.: 1992, Collective Action: Theory and Applications, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth, K. E.: 1998, The Cycling of Moisture and Implications for Global Climate Change, Presentation to the Institute for the Study of the Planet Earth, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 23 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: 1978, Physical and Economic Feasibility of Nonstructural Flood Damage Control Measures, Institute for Flood Control, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office: 1995, Midwest Flood Information on the Performance, Effects, and Control of Levees: Report to Congressional Requesters, (The Office) Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agthe, D.E., Billings, R.B. & Ince, S. Integrating Market Solutions into Government Flood Control Policies. Water Resources Management 14, 247–256 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133825980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133825980

Navigation