Skip to main content
Log in

A Polyhedral Approach for Nonconvex Quadratic Programming Problems with Box Constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply a linearization technique for nonconvex quadratic problems with box constraints. We show that cutting plane algorithms can be designed to solve the equivalent problems which minimize a linear function over a convex region. We propose several classes of valid inequalities of the convex region which are closely related to the Boolean quadric polytope. We also describe heuristic procedures for generating cutting planes. Results of preliminary computational experiments show that our inequalities generate a polytope which is a fairly tight approximation of the convex region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alizadeh, W.F. (1995), Interior point methods in semidefinite programming with application to combinatorial optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization 5: 13–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barahona, F., Jünger, M. and Reinelt, G. (1989), Experiments in quadratic 0–1 programming, Mathematical Programming 44: 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barahona, F. and Mahjoub, A.R. (1986), On the cut polytope, Mathematical Programming 36: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bazaraa, M., Sherali, H.D. and Shetty, C.M. (1993), Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boros, E. and Hammer, P.L. (1991), The max–cut problem and quadratic 0–1 optimization; polyhedral aspect, relaxations and bounds, Annals of Operations Research 33: 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boros, E. and Hammer, P.L. (1993), Cut polytopes, Boolean quadric polytopes and nonnegative pseudo–Boolean functions, Mathematics of Operations Research 18: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, T.F. and Hulbert, L.A. (1989), A direct active set algorithm for large sparse quadratic programs with simple bounds, Mathematical Programming, 45: 373–406.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Angelis, P.L., Pardalos, P.M. and Toraldo, G. (1997), Quadratic Programming with box constraints, in I.M. Bomze et al. (eds.), Developments in Global Optimization (pp. 73–93), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delorme, C. and Poljak, S. (1993), Laplacian eigenvalues and the maximum cut problem, Mathematical Programming 62: 557–574.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujie, T. and Kojima, M. (1997), Semidefinite programming relaxation for nonconvex quadratic programs, Journal of Global Optimization 10: 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, P., Jaumard, B., Ruiz, M. and Xiong, J. (1993), Global minimization of indefinite quadratic functions subject to box constraints, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 40: 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helmberg, C., Rendl, F., Vanderbei, R.J. and Wolkowicz, H. (1996), An interior-point method for semidefinite programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization 6: 342–361.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helmberg, C. and Rendl, F. (1995), Solving quadratic (0,1)-problems by semidefinite programs and cutting planes, ZIB Preprint SC–95-35.

  14. Kalantari, B. and Bagchi, A. (1990), An algorithm for quadratic zero–one programs, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 37: 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kojima, M., Shindoh, S. and Hara, S. (1997), Interior-point methods for the monotone linear complementarity problem in symmetric matrices, SIAM Journal on Optimization 7: 86–125.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Padberg, M. (1989), The Boolean quadric polytope: Some characteristics, facets and relatives, Mathematical Programming 45: 139–172.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pardalos, P.M. and Rodgers, G.P. (1990), Computational aspects of a branch and bound algorithm for quadratic zero–one programming, Computing 45: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pardalos, P.M. and Vavasis, S.A. (1991), Quadratic programming with one negative eigenvalue is NP–hard, Journal of Global Optimization 1: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poljak, S. and Rendl, F. (1995), Solving the max–cut problem using eigenvalues, Discrete Applied Mathematics 62: 249–278.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramana, M. (1993), An Algorithmic Analysis of Multiquadratic and Semidefinite Programming Problems, PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sherali, H. and Alameddine, A. (1990), An explicit characterization of the convex envelope of a bivariate bilinear function over special polytopes, Annals of Operations Research 25: 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sherali, H. and Alameddine, A. (1992), A new reformulation–linearization for solving bilinear programming problems, Journal of Global Optimization 2: 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sherali, H., Lee, Y. and Adams, W.P. (1995), A simultaneous lifting strategy for identifying new class of facets for Boolean quadric polytope, Operations Research Letters 17: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sherali, H. and Tuncbilek, C.H. (1995), A reformulation–convexification approach for solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems, Journal of Global Optimization 7: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simone, C.D. (1989), The cut polytope and the Boolean quadric polytope, Discrete Mathematics 79: 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vavasis, S.A. (1992), Approximate algorithms for indefinite quadratic programming, Mathematical Programming 57: 279–311.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ye, Y. (1992), On the affine scaling algorithm for nonconvex quadratic programming, Mathematical Programming 56: 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yajima, Y., Fujie, T. A Polyhedral Approach for Nonconvex Quadratic Programming Problems with Box Constraints. Journal of Global Optimization 13, 151–170 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008293029350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008293029350

Navigation