Skip to main content
Log in

Constrained Maximum Likelihood

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constrained Maximum Likelihood (CML), developed at Aptech Systems, generates maximum likelihood estimates with general parametric constraints (linear or nonlinear, equality or inequality), using the sequential quadratic programming method. CML computes two classes of confidence intervals, by inversion of the Wald and likelihood ratio statistics, and by simulation. The inversion techniques can produce misleading test sizes, but Monte Carlo evidence suggests this problem can be corrected under certain circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, Takeshi (1985). Advanced Econometrics, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Douglas M. and Watts, Donald G. (1988). Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, (New York: John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E., Hall, B., Hall, R., and Hausman, J. (1974). ‘Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models’. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 3, 653-665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, R.P. (1972). Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Michael W. and Arminger, Gerhard (1995). ‘Specification and estimation of mean-and covariance-structure models’, in Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Gerhard Arminger, Clifford C. Clogg, and Michael E. Sobel (eds.), New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. and Hinkley, D.V. (1974). Theoretical Statistics. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.D. and Weisberg, S. (1990). ‘Confidence curves in nonlinear regression’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 544-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, W.Q. and Escobar, L.A. (1995). ‘Teaching about approximate confidence regions based on maximum likelihood estimation’, The American Statistician, 49, 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jr., J.E., and Schnabel, R.B. (1983). Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, Gradley, Tibshirani, Robert, J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R. (1987). Practical Methods of Optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A.R. (1987). Nonlinear Statistical Models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P.E. and Murray, W. (1972). ‘Quasi-Newton methods for unconstrained optimization’. J. Inst. Math. Appl., 9, 91-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, Christian, Holly, Alberto, and Monfort, Alain (1982). ‘Likelihood ratio test, Wald Test, and Kuhn-Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters’, Econometrica, 50, 63-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. (1990). Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.P. (1977). ‘A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming.’ Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 22, 297-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Wolfgang M. and Hartwig, Robert E. (1995). ‘Computing the Moore-Penrose inverse for the covariance matrix in constrained nonlinear estimation’, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, Willi and Schittkowski, Klaus (1981). Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidian, Mortaza and Bentler, P.M. (1993). ‘A modified Newton method for constrained estimation in covariance structure analysis.’ Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 15 133-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M.A. and Raftery, A.E. (1994). ‘Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap’, J.R. Statist. Soc. B, 56 3-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, Dianne P. and Rust, Bert W. (1986). ‘Confidence intervals for inequality-constrained least squares problems, with applications to ill-posed problems’. American Journal for Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7(2), 473-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1988). ‘Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions’, in Bayesian Statistics 3, Bernardo, J.M., DeGroot, M.H., Lindley, D.V. and Smith, A.F.M. (eds.), pp. 395-402.

  • Rust, Bert W., and Burrus, Walter R. (1972). Mathematical Programming and the Numerical Solution of Linear Equations. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg, Ronald (1995). CML Users Guide. Maple Valley, WA, USA: Aptech Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, Steven G. and Liang, Kung-Yee (1987). ‘Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 605-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, G.R. (1990). ‘The maximal smoothing principle in density estimation’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 470-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1981). ‘Consequences and detection of misspecified nonlinear regression models.’ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 419-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1982). ‘Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models.’ Econometrica, 50, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, Frank (1991). ‘The local nature of hypothesis tests involving inequality constraints in nonlinear models’, Econometrica, 59, 981-995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoenberg, R. Constrained Maximum Likelihood. Computational Economics 10, 251–266 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008669208700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008669208700

Navigation