Skip to main content
Log in

Constructionist Theory to Explain Effects of GDSS

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses communication between actors as a major theoretical element in understanding the link between GDSS (Group Decision Support System) and the construction of shared meaning. The concept of shared meaning is discussed by using two schools of thought: Constructionism versus Constructivism. The schools differ in their approach to processes of communication and conversational techniques. Constructionist theory focuses on the necessity to activate process of intersubjectivity between individuals to reach shared meaning while constructivist theory focuses on process of negotiation. Arguments are given in this paper in favor of the Constructionist approach for dealing with the high complexity of the organizational issues involved in GDSS. The two theoretical approaches were operationalized under two different paradigms of communication: Intersubjective (Constructionist) versus Negotiative (Constructivist) and were compared in an experimental set-up. Better results were found for a GDSS based on the Constructionist paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, H., and H. Goolishian. (1988). “Human System as a Linguist Systems: Evolving Ideas about the Implications for Theory and Practice, ” Family Process 27, 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., and H. Goolishian. (1992). “The Client is the Expert: A Not-Knowing Approach to Therapy, ” in S. McNamee and K. J. Gergen (eds.), Therapy as Social Construction. London: Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthel, C. E., and D. P. Crowne. (1926). “The Need for Approval, Task Categorization and Perceptual Defense, ” Journal of Consulting Psychology 26(6), 547–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., and T. Luckman. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1983). “Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A theoretical Perspective, ” Developmental Review 3, 178–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1987). “Commentary on Mood and Memory, ” Behavior Research and Therapy 25(6), 443–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1996). “Social and Personal Constructs: A Division Left Unresolved, ” Theory and Psychology 6(1), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structure. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G., and J. W. Lorsch. (1982). Decision Making at the Top. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doster, J. A. A., and J. Slaymaker. (1972). “Need Approval, Uncertainty, and Expectancies of Interview Behavior, ” Journal of Counseling Psychology 19(6), 522–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1992). “Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA), ” in J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1995). “On Evaluating the Performance of ‘Wide-Band’ GDSS's, ” European Journal of Operational Research 81, 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. et al. (1979). Thinking in Organizations. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. et al. (1983). Messing about in Problems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1992). “Strategic Development and Implementation – The Role of a Group Decision Support System, ” in S. Kinney, R. Bostrom, and R. Watson (eds.), Computer Augmented Teamwork: A Guided Tour. New York: Van Nostrand and Reinhold, 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London, Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efran, J. et al. (1990). Language, Structure, and Change. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flawell, J. H., and H. M. Wellman. (1977). “Metamemory, ” in R. V. Kail, and J. W. Hagen (eds.), Perspectives on Development of Memory and Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). “Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning, ” Journal of Consumer Research 20(2), 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. (1978). Focusing. New York: Everest House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology, ” American Psychologist 40, 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., and J. Kaye. (1992). “Beyond Narrative in the Negotiation of Therapeutic Meaning, ” in S. McNamee, and K. J. Gergen (eds.), Therapy as Social Construction. London, Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 166–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., and K. S. Widaman. (1982). Social Intelligence: Measuring the Development of Socio-Moral Reflection. London: Prentice-Hall, Engelwood-Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1977). “Review Essay: Habermas's social and Political Theory, ” American Journal of Sociology 83(1), 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshmand, L. T. (1993). “Personal Narrative in the Communal Construction of the Self and Life Issues” in J. Neimeyer (ed.), Constructivist Assessment: A Case Book. Newbury, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1984). “Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems, ” MIS Quaterly 8, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L. M., and J. S. Valacich. (1993). Groups Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). A Theory of the Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolhberg, L. (1958). The Development of Modes of Thinking and Choice in Years 10 to 16. Ph.d. dissertation: University of Chicago.

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). “The Six Stages of Justice Judgement, ” in L. Kohlberg (ed.), Essays on Moral Development, 2, The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. (1993). “The Network Model of Emotion: Motivational Connections, ” Advances in Social Cognition 6, 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfield-Smith, K. (1992). “Exploring the Need for a Shared Cognitive Map, ” Journal of Management Studies 29(3), 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J., and W. J. Lyddon. (1988). “Recent Developments in Cognitive Approaches to Counseling and Psychotherapy, ” Counseling Psychologist 16, 190–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso, J. C. (1996). “Constructionism, Personal Construct Psychology and Narrative Psychology, ” Theory and Psychology 6(1), 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, S., and K. J. Gergen. (1992). Therapy as Social Construction. London: Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society, from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: Chicago Universtity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, G. J. (1993). Constructivist Assessment: A Case Book. London: Newbury Park; New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalia, D. E., and S. Wendko-Olds. (1986). A Child's World. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). Judgement and Reasoning in the Child. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Rutledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1960). “Equilibration and Development of Logical Structures, ” in J. M. Tanner, and B. Inhelder (eds.), Discussion on Child Development, 4. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W., and W. Demopoulos. (1986). Meaning and Cognitive Structure: Issues in the Computational Theory of Mind. Norwood,N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyszczynski, T. et al. (1989). “Depression, Self-focused Attention, and the Negative Memory Bias, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(2), 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsman, J. B. (1983). “The Dynamics of Social Competition in Personal and Categorical Comparison-Situations, ” in W. Doise, and S. Moscovici (eds.), Current issues in European Social Psychology, 1. Maison des Sciences de l'Homme and Cambridge University Press, 279–312.

  • Rijsman, J. B. (1984). “Group Characteristics and Individual Behavior, ” in P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, P. J. Willems, and C. J. de Wolf (eds.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Rijsman, J. B. (1997). “Social Diversity: A Social Psychological Analysis and Some Implications for Groups and Organizations, ” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 6(2), 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski, A. F. (1999). “An Example of the Construction of the Meaning of the Experimental Reality: The Paradigm of Forced Compliance, ” in The Social Co-Construction of the Referential World: A Redefinition of Human Morality. PhD Dissertation. Gilze, The Netherlands: Laurasia B.V. Press, 69–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper, W. J. (1991). Group Decision Support Systems: An Inquiry into Theoretical and Philosophical Issues. PhD Dissertation. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., and K. J. Gergen. (1989). Texts of Identity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organism: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Sciences and Human Behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1923). The Nature of Intelligence and Principle of Cognition. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. (1923). The Unadjusted Girl. Boston: Little Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., and F. Znaniecki. (1918). The Polish Peasant in Europe. Boston: Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). “Cognitive Maps in Rat and Men, ” Psychological Review 55, 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (1996). “Are Constructs Personal, ” Theory and Psychology 6(1), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rutkowski, AF., Smits, M. Constructionist Theory to Explain Effects of GDSS. Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 67–82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008713028886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008713028886

Navigation