Abstract
This article looks at the availability of data on convictions and on sanctions and measures in European countries, on the basis of the European Sourcebook data. It emphasises the limitations in the use that can currently be made of this data, although it has a wide potential in helping to understand criminal justice policy. The differences are, for instance, to be found in offence definitions, statistical rules, and political changes. Moreover the data collection for the Sourcebook on the four categories of sanctions/measures (fines, non-custodial sentences, suspended custodial sentences and unsuspended custodial sentences) was sometimes difficult. Attention is paid to the information collected, the comparability and, as an illustration, to three specific offences (completed homicide, rape and all thefts). The conclusion is that wide differences exist in the level of convictions found and the use of sanctions by the courts. Such differences will reflect both different levels of criminality, diversion away from the courts but also different recording practices. However, even with these caveats what is available does provide a useful starting point in identifying countries on which further research may be carried out.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Home Office, A Question of Evidence? Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990's. Research Study 196. London: Home Office, 1999.
Kangaspunta, K., M. Joutsen and N. Ollus (Eds), Crime and Criminal Justice Systems in Europe and North America 1990-94. Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI), 1998.
Newman, G., Global Report on Crime and Justice. Oxford: Oxford Press, 1999.
Von Hofer, H., Crime statistics as constructs: The case of Swedish rape statistics. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), pp. 77-89, 2000 (this issue).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barclay, G.C. The Comparability of Data on Convictions and Sanctions: Are International Comparisons Possible?. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 8, 13–26 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008741026135
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008741026135