Abstract
Our aim is to enhance the knowledge regarding how the public assess and rate volunteerism. We begin by first developing the model for understanding the potential use of the net-cost concept in eliciting the public's subjective perceptions on the extent to which certain activities are perceived as volunteerism. Four hypotheses relevant to the use of the net-cost concept are developed. We developed a questionnaire consisting of 50 case scenarios and applied it in Canada, India, Italy, Netherlands, and Georgia and Philadelphia in the United States, each with a sample of 450 adults or more. With one exception, our net-cost hypotheses are supported, suggesting that the public perception of volunteering is strongly linked with the costs and benefits that accrue to the individual from the volunteering activity, and that this result holds true across different cultures. Finally, we suggest directions for future research that can shed further light on the relationship between net cost and public good.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, K. (1985). Investing in volunteers: A guide to effective volunteer management. Conserve Neighborhoods, 47, 1–15.
Brudney, J. L., and Stringer, G. E. (1998). Higher education in volunteer administration: Exploring—and critiquing—the state of the art. In M. O'Neill and K. Fletcher (eds.), Nonprofit Management Education: U.S. and World Perspectives, Greenwood/Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 95–109.
Cnaan, R. A., and Amrofell, L. M. (1994). Mapping volunteer activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 335–351.
Cnaan, R. A., Handy, F., and Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 364–383.
Ellis, S. J., and Noyes, K. H. (1990). By the people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fair Labor Standard Act, 29 U.S.C. SS201–219, and FLSA Regulations, 29CFR S553, 100–106, 1985.
McCurley, S. H., and Vesuvio, D. (1985). Brief response: Who is a volunteer. Voluntary Action Leadership, Summer, 14–15.
Scheier, I. H. (1980). Exploring Volunteer Space, Volunteer: The National Center for Citizen Involvement, Boulder, Colorado.
Shure, R. (1991). Volunteering: Continuing expansion of the definition and a practical application of altruistic motivation. The Journal of Volunteer Administration, 9(summer), 36–41.
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243–263.
Stebbins, R. A. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 211–224.
The President's Task Force on Private Sector Initiatives (1982). Volunteers: A valuable resource, [U.S. Government Printing], Washington, D.C.
Tremper, C., Seidman, A., and Tufts, S. (1994). Legal Barriers to Volunteer Service, Nonprofit Risk Management Center, Washington, D.C.
Van Til, J. (1988). Mapping the Third Sector, The Foundation Center, Washington, D.C.
Vineyard, S. (1993). Megatrends and Volunteerism, Heritage Hearts, Downers Grove, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handy, F., Cnaan, R.A., Brudney, J.L. et al. Public Perception of "Who is a Volunteer": An Examination of the Net-Cost Approach from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 11, 45–65 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008903032393
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008903032393