Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Speaking and listening to nature: ethics within ecology

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One context for the papers arising from INTECOL VII in this special issue is the debate over the social construction of science. Some fear that advocates for the social or cultural construction of ecology will undermine attempts to defend nature. But resources are made available in a mediating position of social ‘construal’, particularly alerting ecologists to the social and ethical dimensions of the conducting of their work. When speaking, ecologists will use living and dead metaphors and these carry connotations which in turn raise ethical questions. Different political interest groups may use a word like biodiversity for different ethical purposes. The position of any one speaker is limited, and so greater knowledge is achieved if scientists listen to the situated knowledges of other, diverse people. Even Nature herself, or creatures, may have aspects of personhood. The good ecologist will listen with empathy as a naturalist to what is being said, giving Nature the respect she deserves. These are some of the ethical implications in the very doing of ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram D (1991) The mechanical and the organic: on the impact of metaphor in science. In: Schneider SH and Boston PJ (eds) Scientists on Gaia, pp 66–74. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew R (1995) The church in constable's landscape. Theology 99(1): 6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R (1978) A Realist Theory of Science. 2nd edn. Harvester Press, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton T (1994) Biology and social theory in the environmental debate. In: Redclift M and Benton T (eds) Social Theory and the Global Environment, pp 28–50. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird EAR (1987) The social construction of nature: theoretical approaches to the history of environmental problems. Environmental Review 11(4): 255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman A (1995) The nature of reality and the reality of nature. In: Soul ME and Lease G (eds) Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction, pp 31–46. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook I (1998) Goethean science as a way to read landscape. Landscape Research 23: 51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1996) Do deconstructive ecology and sociobiology undermine Leopold's land ethic? Environmental Ethics 18: 353–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway Morris S (1998) The Crucible of Creation-the Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper NS (2000) How natural is a nature reserve?: an ideological study of British nature conservation landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1131–1152 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry P (2000) Redefining community: towards an ecological republicanism. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1059–1071 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong M and Kwa C (2000) Ecological theories and Dutch nature conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1171–1186 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1995) Acceptance of the 1994 Bernal prize. Science, Technology and Human Values 20(2): 262–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder K (1996) The Social Construction of Nature: A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment. Trans. M. Ritter. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (1996) Constructing nature: elements for a poststructural political ecology. In: Peet R and Watts M (eds) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, pp 46–68. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden N (1985) The Natural Alien: Humankind and the Environment. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio K (1996) The ominous in nature. Free Associations 6: 276–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons M (1989) The matter of nature. Antipode 21(2): 106–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossey D (1983) Gorillas in the Mist. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare AE (1995) Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1988) In the Shadow of Man. Revised edn. George Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1990) Through a Window: Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. George Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall M and Reader J (1992) Environmentalism as the question of human identity. In: Ball I, Goodall M, Palmer C and Reader J (eds) A Critical Guide to Green Theology, pp 35–64. SPCK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1988) Introduction to the revised edition. In: Goodall J, In the Shadow of Man, pp v-viii. Revised edn. George Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross AG (1990) The Rhetoric of Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove White R (1992) Human identity and the environmental crisis. In: Ball I, Goodall M, Palmer C and Reader J (eds) A Critical Guide to Green Theology, pp 13–34. SPCK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer J and Richards P (1996) The invention of biodiversity: social perspectives on the management of biological variety in Africa. Africa 66: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1986) On the semiotic dimension of ecological theory: the case of island biogeography. Biology and Philosophy 1: 377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1997) Trivialization of critique in ecology. Biology and Philosophy 12: 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan JA (1995) Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL and Hawksworth DL (1995) Preface. In: Hawksworth DL (ed) Biodiversity: Measurement and Estimation, pp 5–12. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison C and Burgess J (2000) Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1115–1130 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles NK (1995) Searching for common ground. In: Soulé M and Lease G (eds) Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction, pp 47–63. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M(1962) Being and Time. Trans. J.Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon L (1989) The Politics of Postmodernism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (1996) Hunting and gathering as ways of perceiving the environment. In: Ellen R and Fukui K (eds) Redefining Nature, pp 117–155. Berg, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1990) Is mutualism really irrelevant to ecology? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 71: 101–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight PJ (1999) The adequacy of language as a critique of religious critical realism. Modern Believing 40(2): 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohák E (1984) The Embers and the Stars: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Moral Sense of Nature. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwa C (1993) Modelling the grasslands. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 24: 125–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G and Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lease G (1995) Introduction: nature under fire. In: Soul ME and Lease G (eds) Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction, pp 3–16. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Gerald Duckworth & Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock AH and Samways MJ (2000) Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1153–1169 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DB (1996) Correspondence. Conservation Biology 10: 926–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. Trans C. Smith. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2000) Biodiversity and environmental values: in search of a universal earth ethic. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1029–1044 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1996) The naturalists are dying off. Conservation Biology 10: 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1980) From natural history to ecology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 23: 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1991) A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raglon R and Scholtmeijer M (1996) Shifting ground: metanarratives, epistemology, and the stories of nature. Environmental Ethics 18(1): 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid WV (1996) Beyond protected areas: changing perceptions of ecological management objectives. In: Szaro RC and Johnson DW (eds) Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes, pp 442–443. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards P (1993) Natural symbols and natural history: chimpanzees, elephants and experiments in Mende thought. In: Milton K (ed) Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, pp 144–159. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell JS (1992) British Plant Communities. Vol 3, Grasslands and Montane Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H (1997) Nature is for real: is nature a social construct? In: Chappell T (ed) Philosophy of the Environment, pp 38–64. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston III H (2000) The land ethic at the turn of the millennium. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1045–1058 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Silander Jr J, Armesto JJ, Feinsinger P and Massardo F (2000) Three levels of integrating ecology with the conservation of South American temperate forests: the initiative of the Institute of Ecological Research Chiloé, Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1199–1217 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2000) A conceptual model of ecosystem restoration triage based on experiences from three remote oceanic islands. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1073–1083 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears PB (1964) Ecology-a subversive subject. BioScience 14(7): 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheail J (2000) Ecology-a science put to use. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1099–1113 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette K and McCoy E (1993) Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1980) A succession paradigms in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese 43: 3–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BH (1988) Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspective for Critical Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper K (1995) What Is Nature? Culture, Politics and the Non-Human. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Soran V, Biro J, Moldovan O and Ardelean A (2000) Conservation of biodiversity in Romania. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1187–1198 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice JM (1985) Metaphor and Religious Language. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1995) The social siege of nature. In: Soul ME and Lease G (eds) Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction, pp 137–170. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Takacs D (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallacchini M (2000) A legal framework from ecology. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1085–1098 (this issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ (1988) Technocratic optimism, H.T. Odum, and the partial transformation of ecological metaphor after World War II. Journal of the History of Biology 21: 213–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S (1982) The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros de Castro E (1998) Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute n.s. 4: 469–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (1994a) Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (1994b) Nature and the disorder of history. Environmental History Review 18(2): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Diocese of Chelmsford, The Rectory, 40 Church Road, Rivenhall, Witham, Essex, CM8 3PQ, UK

    Nigel S. Cooper

Authors
  1. Nigel S. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, N.S. Speaking and listening to nature: ethics within ecology. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1009–1027 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008962316747

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008962316747

Search

Navigation