Skip to main content
Log in

The captive rearing of threatened Orthoptera: a comparison of the conservation potential and practical considerations of two species' breeding programmes at the Zoological Society of London

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of ex situ conservation work for Orthoptera is demonstrated by examples of two captive-breeding programmes at the Zoological Society of London. The field cricket Gryllus campestris and wart-biter bush cricket Decticus verrucivorus are both species that have been bred in captivity and reintroduced to field sites in attempts to strengthen dwindling wild populations. Despite a similar approach to both programmes, we have encountered significant differences in the practical applications of the captive management process for the two species. By reviewing these breeding programmes, we examine some of the practical considerations associated with ex situ orthopteran programmes and compare some of the different elements that can influence programme success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balmford, A., Mace, G.M. and Leader-Williams, N. (1996) Designing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conserv. Biol. 10, 719–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrill, A (1993) The conservation of Britain's wart-biter bush-crickets. British Wildlife 5, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrill, A.J. and Brown, V.K. (1990a) The life cycle and distribution of the wart-biter Decticus verrucivorus (L.) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in a chalk grassland in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 53, 125–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrill, A.J. and Brown V.K. (1990b) The habitat requirements of adults of the Decticus verrucivorus (L.) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 53, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.E. (1990) Invertebrates in the laboratory. BLAVA News 2, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.A (1996) Disease risks of wildlife translocations. Conserv. Biol. 10, 349–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.A (1997) Invertebrate pathology: a developing and essential science for invertebrate conservation Mem. Mus. Victoria 56, 647–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.A, Frank, M.J., Croft, P., Clarke, D. and Pearce-Kelly, P. (1997) Mortality of captive British wart-biter crickets: implications for reintroduction programs. J. Wildl. Dis. 33, 673–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, B.A.(1995) Complex life histories and diverse reproductive physiologies of endangered invertebrates: implications for captive conservation. In Conservation of Endangered Species in Captivity: an interdisciplinary approach. (E.F. Gibbons, Jr., B.S. Durrant and J. Demarst eds), pp. 21–35. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., Patmore, J.M. and Sheppard, D. (1996) The field cricket - preventing extinction. British Wildlife. 8, 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B., Scott, J.M., Carpenter, J.W. and Reed, C. (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J.E. (1968) Malameba locustae and its antibiotic control in grasshopper cultures. J. Invert. Pathol. 11, 224–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, C.F. and Erlandson, M.A. (1994) Rearing grasshoppers and locusts: review, rationale and update. J. Orthop. Res. 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrisch, S. (1984) Embryonic development of Decticus verrucivorous. Entomol. Gener. 10, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S.R. (1993) Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 7, 845–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, D. (1989) Practical considerations and techniques in the captive breeding of insects for conservation purposes. The Entomologist 108, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, J.J.C. (1995) Conservation breeding programmes: an important ingredient for species survival. Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 617–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J.A and Haes, E.C.M. (1988) The Grasshoppers and Allied Insects of Great Britain and Ireland. Suffolk, UK. Harley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A.C. (1991) Captive breeding of butterflies and moths. 11. Conserving genetic variation and managing bio-diversity. Int. Zoo Yb. 30, 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce Kelly, P. (1994) Invertebrate propagation and reestablishment programmes: the conservation and education potential for zoos and related institutions. In Creative Conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals (P.J.S. Olney, G.M. Mace and A.T.C. Feistner, eds), pp. 329–337. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Kelly, P., Clarke, D. C., Robertson, M. and Andrews, C. (1991) The display, culture and conservation of invertebrates at London Zoo. Int Zoo Yb. 30, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, R M. (1988) Captive breeding of butterflies for conservation. In Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference of Breeding Endangered Species in Captivity. (B.L. Dresser, R.W. Reece and E.J. Maruska, E.J. eds), pp. 423–30, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Centre for the Reproduction of Endangered Wildlife.

  • Rivers, C.F. (1991) The control of diseases in insect cultures. Int. Zoo Yb. 30, 131–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M.H. (199l) Invertebrates: exhibiting the silent majority. Int. Zoo Yb. 30, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, A. Feistner, A.T.C. (1995) Research in zoos: a growth area in conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 671–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul-Gershantz, L.S. (1993) Notes on the captive life history of the carnivorous katydid Lirometopum coronatum Scudder (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Costa Rica. In Invertebrates in Captivity: SASI/ITAG Conf. Proc., pp. 135–9.

  • Saul-Gershantz, L.S., Arnold, R.A. and Scriber, J.M. (1995) Design of captive environments for endangered invertebrates. In Conservation of Endangered Species in Captivity: an interdisciplinary approach (E.F. Gibbons, Jr, B.S. Durrant and J. Demarst, eds), pp. 51–7. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, N.F.K., Derrickson, S.R., Beissinger, S.R, Wiley, J.W., Smith, T.B., Toone, W.D. and Miller, B. (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv. Biol. 10, 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, A.L. (1993) The role of museums and zoos in influencing public attitudes towards invertebrate conservation. In Perspectives on Insect Conservation. (K.J. Gaston, T.R. New and M.J. Samways, eds), pp. 2l3–29. Andover, UK: Intercept.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearce-Kelly, P., Jones, R., Clarke, D. et al. The captive rearing of threatened Orthoptera: a comparison of the conservation potential and practical considerations of two species' breeding programmes at the Zoological Society of London. Journal of Insect Conservation 2, 201–210 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009643729536

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009643729536

Navigation