Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Formulation for Constrained Mechanical Systems

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation of the advantages of a new formulation in the study of mechanical systems with holonomic and nonholonomic constraints. The formulation, originally proposed for systems of constrained particles, provides an efficient and robust means of simulating general multibody systems in the presence of redundant, degenerate and intermittent constraints. The structure of the formulation also allows the use of a dynamics code for pure kinematics analysis with a simple substitution. In addition, the formulation separates applied and constraint forces explicitly allowing recovery of constraint forces by straightforward means. Several examples are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the formulation in special circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arczewski, K. and Blajer, W., ‘A unified approach to the modelling of holonomic and nonholonomic mechanical systems’, Mathematical Modelling of Systems 1, 1995, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgarte, J., ‘Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1, 1972, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayo, E., de Jalon, J.G., Avello, A. and Cuadrado, J., ‘An efficient computational method for real time multibody dynamic simulation in fully Cartesian coordinates’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 92, 1991, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Israel, A.J. and Greville, T.N.E., Generalized Inverses Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blajer, W., ‘A geometric unification of constrained system dynamics’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blajer, W. and Schiehlen, W., ‘Walking without impacts as a motion/force control problem’, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 114, 1992, 660–665.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gear, C.W., Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, H., Classical Mechanics, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C.F., Matrix Computations, 2nd edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalaba, R. and Udwadia, F., ‘On constrained motion’, Applied Mathematics and Computation 51, 1992, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalaba, R. and Udwadia, F., ‘Equations of motion for nonholonomic, constrained dynamical systems via Gauss's principle’, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 60, 1993, 662–668.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kane, T.R., Dynamics: Theory and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, S.S. and Vanderploeg, M.J., ‘QR decomposition for state space representation of constrained mechanical dynamical systems’, ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 108, 1986, 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luh, J.Y.S., Walker, M.W. and Paul, R.P., ‘On-line computational scheme for mechanical manipulators’, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 120, 1980, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meijaard, J.P., ‘Applications of the singular value decomposition in dynamics’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 103, 1993, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nikravesh, P.E., Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pars, L.A., A Treatise on Analytical Dynamics, Heinemann, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brenan, K.E., Campbell, S.L. and Petzold, L.R., Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, North-Holland, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, C.R. and Mitra, S.K., Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roberson, R.E. and Schwertassek, R., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schiehlen, W.O. (ed.), Multibody Systems Handbook, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, R.P. and Likins, P.W., ‘Singular value decomposition for constrained dynamical systems’, Journal of Applied Mechanics 52, 1985, 943–948.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stejskal, V. and Valasek, M., Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Strang, G., Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Udwadia, F.E. and Kalaba, R.E., ‘A new perspective on constrained on constrained motion’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 439, 1992, 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Udwadia, F.E. and Kalaba, R.E., ‘Equations of motion for mechanical systems’, Journal of Aerospace Engineering 9, 1996, 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Udwadia, F.E. and Kalaba, R.E., Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vukobratovic, M. and Potkonjak, V., Scientific Fundamentals of Robotics Volume 1: Dynamics of Manipulator Robots, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arabyan, A., Wu, F. An Improved Formulation for Constrained Mechanical Systems. Multibody System Dynamics 2, 49–69 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009724704839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009724704839

Navigation