Skip to main content
Log in

An Experimental Study of Competition Between the Native Sacramento Perch (Archoplites interruptus) and Introduced Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus)

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sacramento perch (Archoplites interruptus), a sunfish (Centrarchidae) native only to the Central Valley of California, has been eliminated from most of its native range. To examine the role of interspecific competition in this decline, a series of experiments were conducted to assess the growth, aggressive behavior, and habitat use of Sacramento perch in the presence of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), an introduced centrarchid. The experiments indicate that (1) Sacramento perch gain less weight and show reduced growth when placed with bluegill, but that this interaction only occurs with food limitation, and is not affected by overall fish density; (2) Sacramento perch demonstrate less aggressive behavior than bluegill, but become more aggressive when they are conspicuously larger than bluegill; (3) Sacramento perch shift their habitat use in the presence of bluegill. Overall the results imply that Sacramento perch and bluegill exhibit interspecific competition where the mechanism of interaction is aggressive dominance by bluegill. It is suggested that long term persistence of Sacramento perch may require a habitat that is free of introduced centrarchid fishes, or one controlled by a naturally variable hydrological regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aceituno ME and Nicola SJ (1976) Distribution and status of the Sacramento Perch Archoplites interruptus in California. California Fish and Game 62: 246–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Aceituno ME and Vanicek CD (1976) Life history studies of the Sacramento Perch Archoplites interruptus in California. California Fish and Game 62: 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz DM and Moyle PB (1993) Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of stream fishes. Ecological Applications 3: 246–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff WB, Ziebell CD and Matter WJ (1984) Vulnerability of redbelly tilapia fry to bluegill predation with changes in cover availability. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4: 120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabrand A and Faafeng B (1993) Habitat shifts in roach (Rutilus rutilus) induced by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) introduction: predation risk versus pelagic behavior. Oecologia 95: 38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR and Moyle PB (1997) Invading species in the Eel River, California: successes, failures, and relationships with resident species. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49: 271–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlander KD (1977) The Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology, Volume II. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey WJ (1981) Anti-predator function of bluegill sunfish nesting colonies. Nature 290(5807): 586–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas ME, Marsh PC and Minckley WL (1994) Indigenous fishes of western North America and the hypothesis of competitive displacement: Meda fulgida (Cyprinidae) as a case study. Copeia 1: 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD (1988) Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: what have we learned? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 2238–2246

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF and Gilliam JF (1992) Nonlethal impacts of predator invasion: facultative suppression of growth and reproduction. Ecology 73: 959–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindar K, Jonsson B, Andrew JH and Northcote TG (1988) Resource utilization of sympatric and experimentally allopatric cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden charr. Oecologia 74: 481–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1980) Competitive interactions between California reef fishes of the genus Embiotoca Ecology 61(4): 918–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger RG (1971) Competitive exclusion as a factor influencing the distributions of two species of terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 52(4): 632–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HW and Moyle PB (1981) Environmental analysis of species introductions into aquatic systems. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110: 772–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993a) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993b) Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses to climate and habitat change. In: Kareiva PM, Kingsolver JG and Huey RB (eds) Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP and Moyle PB (1995) Conflicting Values Complicate Stream Protection. California Agriculture 49(6): 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybee PM (1993) Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: sorting out the actual and artefactual in an empirical case study of centrarchid fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107: 175–291

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarraher DB and Gregory RW (1970) Adaptability and current status of introductions of Sacramento Perch, Archoplites interruptus, in North America. Transactions of the American Fish Society 4: 700–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK (1985) Predation and species replacement in American southwestern fishes: a case study. The Southwestern Naturalist 30(2): 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK and Minckley WL (1987) Persistence and stability of fish and invertebrate assemblages in a repeatedly disturbed Sonoran Desert stream. American Midland Naturalist 117(1): 177–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (1976) Inland Fishes of California. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (1994) Biodiversity, biomonitoring, and the structure of stream fish communities. In: Loeb SL and Spacie A (eds) Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (1995) Conservation of native freshwater fishes in the mediterranean-type climate of California, USA: a review. Biological Conservation 72: 271–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB and Light T (1996) Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77(6): 1666–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB and Williams JE (1990) Biodiversity loss in the temperate zone: decline of the native fish fauna of California. Conservation Biology 4: 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Mathews SB and Bonderson N (1974) Feeding habits of the Sacramento Perch, Archoplites interruptus. Transactions of the American Fish Society 103: 399–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Yoshiyama RM, Williams JE and Wikramanayake ED (1995) Fish Species of Special Concern in California. Second edition. Department of Fish and Game, State of California, The Resource Agency, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GI (1948) A Contribution to the life history of the Sacramento Perch (Archoplites interruptus) in Clear Lake, Lake County, California. California Fish and Game 34: 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GI (1951) The fishery of Clear Lake, Lake County California. California Fish and Game 37: 439–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg CW, Mittlebach GG and Wainright PC (1992) Two-stage life histories in fish: the interaction between juvenile competition and adult performance. Ecology 73: 255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1986) Effects of reduced interspecific competition on resource utilization in perch (Perca fluviatilis). Ecology 67(2): 355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1987) Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oecologia 73: 170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L and Greenberg LA (1990) Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca fluviatilis)-roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71(1): 44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross TS (1991) Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Environmental Biology of Fishes 30: 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz PD (1994) Fish Remains from YOL-182: A Prehistoric Village in the Lower Sacramento Valley. Brienes, West and Schulz, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition. American Scientist 70: 586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist 122(2): 240–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanicek DC (1980) Decline of the Lake Greenhaven Sacramento Perch population. California Fish and Game 66: 178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Welden CW and Slauson WL (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. Quarterly Review of Biology 61: 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE and Hall DJ (1976) Niche shifts in sunfishes: experimental evidence and significance. Science 191: 404–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE and Hall DJ (1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE and Hall DJ (1979) Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60: 256–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchetti, M.P. An Experimental Study of Competition Between the Native Sacramento Perch (Archoplites interruptus) and Introduced Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Biological Invasions 1, 55–65 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010026528711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010026528711

Navigation