Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cannibalism and Intraguild Predation Among Phytoseiid Mites: Are Aggressiveness and Prey Preference Related to Diet Specialization?

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested whether specialist and generalist phytoseiid mites differ in aggressiveness and prey choice in cannibalism and intraguild predation. Specialists tested were Galendromus occidentalis, Neoseiulus longispinosus, Phytoseiulus persimilis, and P. macropilis; tested were Amblyseius andersoni, Euseius finlandicus, E. hibisci, Kampimodromus aberrans, Neoseiulus barkeri, N. californicus, N. cucumeris, N. fallacis, and Typhlodromus pyri. Aggressiveness of cannibalistic females against larvae was not related to diet specialization except that highly aggressive species were exclusively generalists. Seldom to moderately cannibalizing species occurred in both generalist and specialist phytoseiids. In contrast to aggressiveness in cannibalism, generalists and specialists differed in aggressiveness in intraguild predation. Adult females of specialists were only slightly aggressive against heterospecific larvae, whereas adult females of all generalists except T. pyri were highly aggressive. Adult females of generalists were able to discriminate between con- and heterospecific larvae and preferentially consumed the latter when given a choice. Adult females of specialists except G. occidentalis showed no preference when given a choice between con- and heterospecific larvae. We conclude that aggressiveness in intraguild predation, species recognition and subsequent preferential consumption of heterospecifics when given a choice is common in generalist but not specialist phytoseiids. We discuss the evolutionary pathways that might have led to the difference between specialists and generalists in species discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, P. and Colton, T. 1998. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics.Wiley, Chichester, England.

  • Arn, H. 1991. Sex pheromones. In: Tortricid pests, their biology, natural enemies and control, L.P.S van der Geest and H.H. Evenhuis (eds), pp. 187–207. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. and Croft M.B. 1996. Intra-and interspecific predation among adult female phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae): effects on survival and reproduction. Environ. Entomol. 25: 853–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A., Kim, S.S. and Kim, D.I. 1995. Leaf residency and interleaf movement of four phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on apple. Environ. Entomol. 24: 1344–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A., Kim, S.S. and Kim, D.I. 1996. Intra-and interspecific predation by Metaseiulus occidentalis, Typhlodromus pyri, Neoseiulus fallacis and Amblyseius andersoni on different life stages: effects on survival, oviposition and activity. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A., Monetti, L.N. and Pratt, P.D. 1998. Comparative life histories and predation types: are Neoseiulus californicus and N. fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) similar type II selective predators of spider mites. Environ. Entomol. 27: 531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A., Luh, H.K. and Schausberger, P. 1999. Larval size relative to larval feeding, cannibalism on larvae, egg size or adult female size and larval-adult setae patterns among 13 phytoseiid mite species. Exp. Appl Acarol. 23: 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall, S.R.X. and Cuthill, I.C. 1997. The information costs of generalism. Oikos 80: 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., Takabayashi, J., Posthumus, M.A., Schuette, C. and Krips, O. 1998. Plantphytoseiid interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: variation in production of cues and in responses of predatory mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22: 311–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar, M.A. and Crespi, B.J. (eds) 1992. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraji, F., Janssen, A., van Rijn P.C.J. and Sabelis, M.W. 2000. Kin recognition by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans: discrimination among own, conspecific, and heterospecific eggs. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L.R. 1975. Cannibalism in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle,W. and Sabelis,M.W. 1985. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, R.G. and Prokopy, R.J. 1981. Mite predator responses to prey and predator-emitted stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 895–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, I.V. and Croft, B.A. 1993. Influence of temperature on interspecific predation and cannibalism by Metaseiulus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 770–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Croft, B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Rodriguez, J.G. 1987. Nutritional ecology of phytoseiid mites. In: Nutritional ecology of insects, mites and spiders, F. Slansky and J.G. Rodriguez (eds), pp. 609–644. Wiley, New York.

  • McMurtry, J.A. and Scriven, G.T. 1965. Insectary production of phytoseiid mites. J. Econ. Entomol. 58: 282–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monetti, L.N. and Croft, B.A. 1997. Mating, cross-mating and related behaviours of Neoseiulus californicus and Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palevsky, E. 1997. Development of a program for integrated management of the European red mite, Panonychus ulmi, for the main apple cultivars in Israel. PhD Dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis, G.A. 1981. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 225–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis, G.A., Myers, C.A. and Holt, R.D. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, J.A., Kaya, H.K., Ehler, L.E., Marois, J.J. and Jaffee, B.A. 1995. Intraguild predation among biological control agents: theory and evidence. Biol. Control 5: 303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. 1985a. Reproduction. In: Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol 1B, W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 73–82. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. 1985b. Predation on spider mites. In: Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol 1B, W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 103–130. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Bakker, F. 1992. How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view of the dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 16: 203–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Dicke, M. 1985. Long range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol 1B,W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 141–160. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W. and Janssen, A. 1994. Evolution of life-history patterns in the Phytoseiidae. In: Mites: ecological and evolutionary analyses of life history patterns, M.A. Houck (ed.), pp. 70–98. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. 1997. Inter-and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. 1999a. Juvenile survival and development in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae) feeding on con-and heterospecific immatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. 1999b. Predation preference of Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari, Phytoseiidae) when offered con-and heterospecific immature life stages. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. and Croft, B.A. 1999a. Predation on and discrimination between conand heterospecific eggs among specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. and Croft, B.A. 1999b. Activity, feeding, and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger, P. and Croft, B.A. 2000. Nutritional benefits of intraguild predation and cannibalism among generalist and specialist phytoseiid mites. Ecol. Entomol. (in press). SPSS 1997. Advanced Statistics 7.5. SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, A. and Schausberger, P. 1999a. Cannibalism and interspecific predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus: predation rates and effects on reproduction and juvenile development. BioControl 43: 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, A. and Schausberger, P. 1999b. Predation preferences and discrimination between conand heterospecific prey by the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus. BioControl 43: 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, D.S. and Chant, D.A. 1989. Population growth and predation interference between twospecies of predatory phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiiidae) in interactive systems. Oecologia 80: 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.Q. and Croft, B.A. 1995a. Intraspecific competition in immature Amblyseius fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.Q. and Croft, B.A. 1995b. Interspecific competition and predation between immature Amblyseius fallacis, Amblyseius andersoni, Typhlodromus occidentalis and Typhlodromus pyri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z.Q. and Sanderson, J.P. 1997. Patterns, mechanisms and spatial scale of aggregation in generalist and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21: 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, 2046 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-2907, USA

    Peter Schausberger

  2. Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, 2046 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-2907, USA

    Brian A. Croft

Authors
  1. Peter Schausberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian A. Croft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schausberger, P., Croft, B.A. Cannibalism and Intraguild Predation Among Phytoseiid Mites: Are Aggressiveness and Prey Preference Related to Diet Specialization?. Exp Appl Acarol 24, 709–725 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747208519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747208519

Search

Navigation