Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of ductile crack growth in thin aluminum panels using 3-D surface cohesive elements

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work describes the formulation and application of a 3-D, interface-cohesive finite element model to predict quasi-static, ductile crack extension in thin aluminum panels for mode I loading and growth. The fracture model comprises an initially zero thickness, interface element with constitutive response described by a nonlinear traction-separation relationship. Conventional volumetric finite elements model the nonlinear (elastic-plastic) response of background (bulk) material. The interface-cohesive elements undergo gradual decohesion between faces of the volumetric elements to create new traction free crack faces. The paper describes applications of the computational model to simulate crack extension in C(T) and M(T) panels made of a 2.3 mm thick, Al 2024-T3 alloy tested as part of the NASA-Langley Aging Aircraft program. Parameters of the cohesive fracture model (peak opening traction and local work of separation) are calibrated using measured load vs. outside surface crack extensions of high constraint (T-stress > 0) C(T) specimens. Analyses of low constraint M(T) specimens, having widths of 300 and 600 mm and various a/W ratios, demonstrate the capabilities of the calibrated model to predict measured loads and outside surface crack extensions. The models capture accurately the strong 3-D effects leading to various degrees of crack front tunneling in the C(T) and M(T) specimens. The predicted crack growth response shows rapid convergence with through-thickness mesh refinement. Adaptive load increment procedures to control the rate of decohesion in the interface elements leads to stable, rapidly converging iterations in the globally implicit solution procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Proceedings of the FAA-NASA symposium on continued airworthiness of aircraft structures. July 1997.

  2. Proceedings from the second joint NASA/FAA/DoD conference on aging aircraft. Williamsburg, VA, 1998.

  3. Gurson, A.L. (1997). Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I. Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J. Engng. Mat. Tech. 99, 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chu, C.C. and Needleman, A. (1980). Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J. Engng. Mat. Tech. 102, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tvergaard, V. (1990). Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Adv. Appl; Mech. 27, 83–151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitt, W., Nagel, G., Ockewitz, A., Hodulak, L. and Blauel, J.G. (1990). Analytical and numerical crack for a leak-before-break assessment of a nuclear pressure vessel. Int. J. Pres. Ves. Piping 43, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xia, L., Shih, C.F. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1995). Computational approach to ductile crack growth under large scale yielding conditions. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43, 389–413.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruggieri, C., Panontin, T.L. and Dodds, R.H. (1996). Numerical modeling of ductile crack growth in 3-D using computational cell elements. Int. J. Fract. 82, 67–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pardoen, T. and Hutchinson, J.W. (2000). An extended model for void growth and coalesence. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, to appear.

  10. Needleman, A. (1987). A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J. Appl. Mech. 54, 523–531.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tvergaard, V. (1990). Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal. Mat. Sci. Engng. A. 125, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1990). Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Mod. Sim. Mat. Sci. Engng. 1, 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Needleman, A. (1990). An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface. J. Mech. Phys. Solids.38, 289–324.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tvergaard, V. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1993). The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 1377–1892.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tvergaard, V. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1993). The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 1119–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suo, Z., Ortiz, M. and Needleman, A. (1992). Stability of solids with interfaces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 613–640.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levy, A.J. (1994). Separation at a circular interface under bi-axial loading. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1087–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finot, M., She, Y.-L., Needleman, A. and Suresh, S. (1994). Micro-mechanical modelling of reinforcement fracture in plastic-reinforcement metal-matrix composites. Metall. Trans. 254, 2403–2420.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1994). A numerical study of dynamic crack growth in elastic-viscoplastic solids. Int. J. Solids Struct. 84, 769–788.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegmund, T. and Needleman, A. (1997). Numerical simulation of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1397–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1996). Numerical simulation of dynamic crack growth along an interface. Int. J. Fract. 74, 289–324.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Camacho, G.T. and Ortiz, M. (1996). Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 2899–2988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, G., Cornec, A. and Schwalbe, K.-H. (1998). Three-dimensional finite element simulation of crack extension in aluminium alloy 2024FC. Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mat. Struct. 21, 1159–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  24. de-Andres, A., Perez, J.L. and Ortiz, M. (1999). Elasto-plastic finite element analysis of three-dimensional fatigue crack growth in aluminum shafts subjected to axial loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 2231–2258.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ortiz, M. and Pandolfi, A. (1999). Finite deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 44, 1287–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dawicke, D.S. and Newman, J.C. (1997). Evaluation of fracture parameters for prediction residual strength of multi-site damage cracking. In: Proceedings from the First Joint NASA/FAA/DoD Conference on Aging Aircraft.

  27. Betegon, C. and Hancock, J.W. (1991). Two-parameter characterization of elastic-plastic crack tip fields. J. Appl. Mech. 58, 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hashagen, F. and de Borst, B. (1997). Interface element for modeling the onset and growth of mixed-mode cracking in aluminum and fibre metal laminates. Struct. Engr. & Mechs. 5, 817–837.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schellekens, J.C.J. and de Borst, R. (1993). On the numerical integration of interface elements. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 86, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lubliner, J. (1972). On the thermodynamic foundations of non-linear solid mechanics. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 7, 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lubliner, J. (1973). On the structure of the rate equations of materials with internal variable. Acta Mech. 17, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hohberg, J.-M. (1990). A note on spurious oscillation in FEM joint elements. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dynamics 19, 773–779.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Day, R. and Potts, D.M. (1994). Zero thickness interface elements-Numerical stability and application. Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 18, 689–708.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koppenhoefer, K., Gullerud, A., Ruggieri, C., Dodds, R.H. and Healy, B. (1999). WARP3D-Release 10.8 Manual. Civil Engineering, Report No. UILU-ENG–95–2012, University of Illinois.

  35. Hughes, T.J.R. (1980). Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and non-linear media. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 15, 1413–1418.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Siegmund, T. and Brocks, W. (1998). Local fracture criteria: Length-scales and applications. J. Phys. IV. 8, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Needleman, A. (1997). Numerical modeling of crack growth under dynamic loading conditions. Comp; Mech. 19, 403–469.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hom, C.L. and McMeeking, E.M. (1990). Large crack tip opening in thin elastic-plastic sheets. Int. J. Fract. 45, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Newman, J.C., Crews, J.H., Bigelow, C.A. and Dawicke, D.S. (1995). Variations of a global constraint factor in cracked bodies under tension and bending loads. In: Kirk, M. and Bakker, A. (eds.), Constraint effects in fracture, Theory and applications: Second Volume, ASTM STP 1244, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dawicke, D.S., Newman, J.C. and Bigelow, C.A. (1995). Three-dimensional CTOA and constraint effects during stable tearing in thin sheet material. In: Reuter, W.O., Underwood, J.H. and Newman, J.C. (eds.), Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 26, ASTM STP 1256, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dawicke, D.S., Sutton, M.A., Newman, J.C. and Bigelow, C.A. (1995). Measurement and analysis of critical CTOA for an aluminum alloy sheet. In: Erdogan, F. (ed.), Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 25, ASTM STP 1220, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 358–379.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dawicke, D.S. and Sutton, M.A. (1994). CTOA and crack tunneling measurements in thin sheet 2024-T3 aluminum alloy. Exp. Mach. 34, 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Siegmund, T. and Brocks, W. (2000). Modeling crack growth in thin sheet aluminum alloys. In: Halford, G.R. and Gallagher, J.R. (eds.), Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 31, ASTM STP 1389, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gullerud, A.S., Dodds, R.H., Hampton, R.W. and Dawicke, D.S. (1999). 3-D modeling of ductile crack growth in thin sheet metals: Computational aspects and validation. Engng. Fract. Mech. 63, 347–374.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Siegmund, T. and Brocks, W. (2000). The role of cohesive strength and separation energy for modeling ductile fracture. In: Jerina, K. and Paris, P. (eds.), Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 30, ASTM STP 1360, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Y. Arun Roy & Robert H. Dodds Jr.

Authors
  1. Y. Arun Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert H. Dodds Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, Y.A., Dodds, R.H. Simulation of ductile crack growth in thin aluminum panels using 3-D surface cohesive elements. International Journal of Fracture 110, 21–45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010816201891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010816201891

Search

Navigation