Skip to main content
Log in

A Preterm Birth Prevention Project in Nova Scotia, Canada

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The Halifax County Preterm Birth Prevention Project was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a population-based preterm birth (PTB) prevention program in Nova Scotia from January 1995 through June 1997 (n = 10,326). Methods: Preterm birth rates, adjusted for risk status and maternal age, were evaluated over time in Halifax County and compared to non-Halifax County parturients in Nova Scotia. Physician participation was evaluated by means of a mailed survey. Results: There was no appreciable change in the overall (<37 weeks) or early (<34 weeks) PTB rates within or outside Halifax County during the intervention period compared to the preintervention period. Although not significant, the very (<30 weeks) PTB rate in Halifax County decreased by 40% from 0.53 to 0.32%, while outside Halifax County it remained stable (0.43–0.42%). There was a statistically significant decrease in early and very PTB associated with spontaneous labour, as well as an apparent shift in the timing of delivery from very preterm to preterm (≥30 weeks). Participation among responding physicians was greater for high-risk than low-risk women, but full compliance with project recommendations was low. Conclusion: The overall ineffectiveness of the Halifax County Preterm Birth Prevention Project may reflect the reluctance of practitioners to fully incorporate the recommended prevention strategies into their practice. However, such interventions may reduce the risk of spontaneous early preterm birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Berkowitz GS, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:414–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ng E, Wilkins R. Maternal demographic characteristics and rates of low birth weight in Canada, 1961-90. Health Rep 1994;6:241–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S, Ohlsson A, Wen SW, Allen A, Platt R. Determinants of preterm birthrates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. N Engl J Med 1998;339;1434–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Higby K, Xenakis EMJ, Pauerstein CJ. Do tocolytic agents stop preterm labour? A critical and comprehensive review of efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1247–56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Canadian Preterm Labour Investigators Group. Treatment of preterm labour with the beta-adrenergic agonist ritodrine. N Engl J Med 1992;327:308–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy PA. Preterm birth prevention programs: A critique of current literature. J Nurse-Midwifery 1993;38:324–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Main DM, Gabbe SG, Richardson D, Strong S. Can preterm births be prevented? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:892–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Konte JM, Creasy RK, Laros RK. California north coast preterm birth prevention project. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:727-30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mueller-Heubach E, Reddick D, Bennett B, Bent R. Preterm birth prevention: Evaluation of a prospective controlled randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1172–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Copper RL, Corliss DK, Andrews JB, Carpenter AH. The Alabama preterm birth prevention project. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:933–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collaborative Group on Preterm Birth Prevention. Multicentre randomized controlled trial of a preterm birth prevention program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:352–66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hobel CJ, Ross MG, Bemis RL, Bragonier JR, Nessim S, Sandhu M, Bear MB, Mori B. TheWest Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project I: Program impact on high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore ML, Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Wells HB, Zaccaro DJ, Terrell T. A randomized trial of nurse intervention to reduce preterm and low birth weight births. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:656–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hueston WJ, Knox MA, Eilers G, Pauwels J, Lonsdorf D. The effectiveness of preterm birth prevention educational programs for high-risk women: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:705–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Dreyfus J, Collin D, Winisdorfer G, Guegon S, Lecomte M, Lazar P. Prevention of preterm births: A perinatal study in Hagauenau, France. Pediatrics 1985;76:154–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herron MA, Katz M, Creasy RK. Evaluation of a preterm birth prevention program: Preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:452–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goujon H, Papiernik E, Maine D. The prevention of preterm delivery through prenatal care: An intervention study in Martinique. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1984;22:339–43.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Moore ML, Michielutte R, Sharp PC, Buescher PA. Regional program for prevention of premature birth in northwestern North Carolina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:550–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yawn BP, Yawn RA. Preterm birth prevention in a rural practice. JAMA 1989;262:230–3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fangman JJ, Mark PM, Pratt L, Conway KK, Healy ML, Oswald JW, Uden DL. Prematurity prevention programs: An analysis of successes and failures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:744–50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Statistics Canada. 1996 Census of Canada. Government of Nova Scotia, Department of Finance, Statistics Division, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Armson BA, Dodds L. Prediction of preterm birth in a population of Canadian women. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1994;26 (Suppl. 2):93.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens-Simon C, Orleans M. Low-birthweight prevention programs: The enigma of failure. Birth 1999;26:184–91.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shiono PH, Klebanoffll MA. A review of risk-scoring for preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 1993;20:107–25.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beukens P, Alexander S, Boutsen M, Blondel B, Kaminski M, Reid M. European Community Collaborative Study Group on Prenatal Screening. Randomized controlled trial of routine cervical examinations in pregnancy. Lancet 1994;344:841–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Collaborative Home Uterine Monitoring Study Group. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of home uterine monitoring: Active versus sham device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1120–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davies BL, Stewart PJ, Sprague AE, Niday PA, Nimrod CA, Dulberg CS. Education of women about the prevention of preterm birth. Can J Public Health 1998;89:260–3.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effectiveness of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 1980;321:1306–11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gomez R, Romero R, Edwin SS, David C. Pathogenesis of preterm labour and preterm premature rupture of membranes associated with intra amniotic infection. Infec Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:135–76.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moutquin JM, Milot-Roy V, Irion O. Preterm birth prevention: Effectiveness of current strategies. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can 1996;18:571–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Anthony Armson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armson, B.A., Dodds, L., Cervin, C. et al. A Preterm Birth Prevention Project in Nova Scotia, Canada. Matern Child Health J 5, 189–197 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300102132

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300102132

Navigation